• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about prohibition? Source E is an extract from a letter written in 1932, nearing the end of prohibition, by John D. Rockefeller Jr., a wealthy industrialist. Rockefeller would have been a major employer at the time; he would have strongly supported prohibition as one of the concerns of employers was how alcohol decreased a workers performance making the business less efficient. To support the idea that Rockefeller was in favour of prohibition is that he initially claims to have "hoped that it would be widely supported by public opinion and the day would soon come when the evil effects of alcohol be recognised" with "it" referring to the introduction to prohibition, this tells us that he was hopeful that prohibition would be successful and also that he personally sees alcohol as an issue. ...read more.

Middle

Source A says how "no earlier law had gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans" and this provides some excuse for good people committing crimes, as they are quite obviously angered at something they feel is a right being taken away from them. Source E is reliable in the way that Rockefeller had no reason to lie about prohibition seeing as from lying he gets no benefit, from previous knowledge as well we know that prohibition did fail and there was a great increase in crime and this source supports that. Source F is taken from a speech made by John F. ...read more.

Conclusion

Police officers, prohibition agents and even judges accepted bribes from gangs who prospered from the introduction of prohibition, creating a new black market for the sale of alcohol, to turn a blind eye. Kramer had the best intentions for prohibition and had hoped it would be a success although it failed miserably. If you read source F with no background information you would be mislead into believing that prohibition was a success and although John F. Kramer was not lying the source is still not reliable and for that reason I feel Source E is the reliable source of the two, having the benefit of having hindsight over the situation and the writer had knowledge of the whole transition of prohibition. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

    The fact that Kramer was the First prohibition meant that he had a huge amount of insight within the subject and could express his views fully. His reliability could therefore be said to be the same as John D Rockerfeller.

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    In Chicago Al Capone ran the city and, it seems the police department. Finally the police officer goes on to explain about an involuntary bribe he once took, when a man just presented him with $75 in the street. Although both sources J and I support one another's claims there is no concrete evidence in either source.

  1. Prohibition Sources Questions

    Kevin Costner not caring any longer about Prohibition and going along with the story line. The ending has Elliot Ness going away for a drink. The point that historians can argue if they watched the film is that the film is'nt intended to be made for Prohibition or historian purposes,

  2. c) Study Sources E and F Which of these two sources is the more ...

    army of lawbreakers has appeared", many openly ignore Prohibition, "respect for the law has been greatly lessened", and there has been a massive increase in crime. This is backed up by Source A which says that Prohibition "created the greatest criminal boom in American history".

  1. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition?

    However, this source is quite reliable because it is backed up by other sources, although he says that he initially supported prohibition and "hoped it would be widely supported". H also talks about the consequences of prohibition saying that "drinking has generally increased" which is backed up by sources G

  2. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about prohibition?

    This is very important because it shows that he had the benefit of hindsight, and he could reflect on Prohibition. This is important because we can see that he knows what happened in prohibition. There was no motive for producing an inaccurate source, however, this does depend on whom the letter is being written to.

  1. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition?

    Source E says that "drinking has generally increased; the speakeasy has replaced the saloon; a vast army of lawbreakers has appeared; many of our best citizens have openly ignored Prohibition; respect for the law has been greatly lessened; and crime has increased to a level never seen before".

  2. The USA Was Prohibition bound To Fail?

    the failure at the beginning and put how it came about at the end, it would give a different opinion on the whole matter. But my personal feeling is that they both in contrast don't agree and don't disagree, yes they might have wrote more about how it came about

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work