• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework - (c) Koral Jackson 10R Study Sources E and F. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition? Source E is more reliable than Source F in many ways. Source E is from 1932, just before Prohibition was ending, and Source F is from 1920 which is much earlier, just as Prohibition was being introduced. Immediately it is obvious that Source E is more reliable in this way, as the person who wrote the letter was likely to have been around through the whole of Prohibition and had seen what had happened, whereas the Prohibition Commissioner speaking in 1920 had not yet seen any of what Source E talks about. Source E is from a letter written by a wealthy industrialist. There is no obvious reason why he would lie about Prohibition in this letter, as there is nothing included in it ...read more.

Middle

Source A says that "[Prohibition] created the greatest criminal boom in American history", which is in agreement with Source E where is says "a vast army of lawbreakers has appeared... and crime has increased to a level never seen before". Source B also agrees with Source E where is says "By 1928 there were more than 30,000 'speakeasies' in New York", which backs up Source E where it says "the speakeasy has replaced the saloon". Sources G and H, which are factual statistics, also back up Source E. Source G can be seen in two different ways, but one of these is that the number of illegal stills were increasing over time, and so were the amounts of alcohol produced. This supports Source E where is says "drinking has generally increased;... ...read more.

Conclusion

The man speaking in Source F is only saying what he thinks will happen, as Prohibition was only just beginning and he had not yet seen what the writer of Source E discussed. He couldn't know anything for sure, and therefore there are no facts at all included in the source, which immediately makes it unreliable. However, this source does show that there were people involved in the reinforcement of Prohibition who were detirmined to make it work, and so it is proving that in fact not everybody was against Prohibition. Some of the other sources suggest that there was nobody willing to give it a go. In conclusion, I can say with no doubt at all that Source E is far more reliable than Source F. The main reason is of course that Source E can be backed up by facts and other sources, and Source F cannot. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    The children shown on this poster clearly do need help. If the father continues to go to the saloon on a regular basis, he will undoubtedly become unhealthy and less likely to work, as he may be too drunk or hung over.

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    D Study Sources G and H Do these two sources prove that prohibition was successful? I do not think that sources G and H can prove that prohibition was successful. Both sources G and H are charts showing statistics about how successful the police were in enforcing prohibition.

  1. Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

    The messages that are expressed by the Women's Christian Temperance Union and the Anti- saloon league all strongly agree with the source. 'One of the great evils of the time - alcoholism'...'The Women's Christian Temperance Union had joined in a crusade...'

  2. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about prohibition?

    The motive for the Source was to induce a public confidence in Prohibition and as he was the Commissioner, he had to make sure that there was public confidence in him as well. This means that his speech was biased.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework

    Source D's explanation of low salaries allow us to infer agents were liable to corruption and there is no way we could gather this from Source C. The many figures presented in Source E offers evidence in support of Source C's suggestion that American authorities were utterly overwhelmed by the problem.

  2. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    The child wants to go inside but he is too young and can't. He mother also does not want the child to go in and see his daddy drunk. The sentence that finishes of the title is using the same method as source C.

  1. c) Study Sources E and F Which of these two sources is the more ...

    army of lawbreakers has appeared", many openly ignore Prohibition, "respect for the law has been greatly lessened", and there has been a massive increase in crime. This is backed up by Source A which says that Prohibition "created the greatest criminal boom in American history".

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

    This source is telling us that alcoholism makes families poor and keeps them poor. The slogan for the 'club' is "The most expensive the world to belong to" meaning that drinking is an expensive habit and drains the family income.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work