• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework - (c) Koral Jackson 10R Study Sources E and F. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition? Source E is more reliable than Source F in many ways. Source E is from 1932, just before Prohibition was ending, and Source F is from 1920 which is much earlier, just as Prohibition was being introduced. Immediately it is obvious that Source E is more reliable in this way, as the person who wrote the letter was likely to have been around through the whole of Prohibition and had seen what had happened, whereas the Prohibition Commissioner speaking in 1920 had not yet seen any of what Source E talks about. Source E is from a letter written by a wealthy industrialist. There is no obvious reason why he would lie about Prohibition in this letter, as there is nothing included in it ...read more.


Source A says that "[Prohibition] created the greatest criminal boom in American history", which is in agreement with Source E where is says "a vast army of lawbreakers has appeared... and crime has increased to a level never seen before". Source B also agrees with Source E where is says "By 1928 there were more than 30,000 'speakeasies' in New York", which backs up Source E where it says "the speakeasy has replaced the saloon". Sources G and H, which are factual statistics, also back up Source E. Source G can be seen in two different ways, but one of these is that the number of illegal stills were increasing over time, and so were the amounts of alcohol produced. This supports Source E where is says "drinking has generally increased;... ...read more.


The man speaking in Source F is only saying what he thinks will happen, as Prohibition was only just beginning and he had not yet seen what the writer of Source E discussed. He couldn't know anything for sure, and therefore there are no facts at all included in the source, which immediately makes it unreliable. However, this source does show that there were people involved in the reinforcement of Prohibition who were detirmined to make it work, and so it is proving that in fact not everybody was against Prohibition. Some of the other sources suggest that there was nobody willing to give it a go. In conclusion, I can say with no doubt at all that Source E is far more reliable than Source F. The main reason is of course that Source E can be backed up by facts and other sources, and Source F cannot. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

    states source B which agrees perfectly with what Rockerfeller was bringing out in his letter.

  2. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    This would have lead to the closure of all the shops. This supports source A as in source A he says ''from 1922 I was unemployed'' and ''then in 1931 everything went bankrupt''. He wouldn't have received any unemployment benefits as these were cut.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    give us any reason to believe they may be trying to present Prohibition as being more successful than it was. The only aspect, which can be disputed, is the provenance of Source J. A policeman spoke it; therefore he may have had an unreliable agenda.

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    Also the amount of power is accentuated by "put you in a post where there was nothing but weeds" which shows the cruelty they treated officers trying to uphold the law. A definite connection comes with the sentence "It was a conspiracy and my superior officers were involved".

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    Both posters were designed to appeal to people's caring, sensitive nature. Both posters could have been published by a number of people, for example the Anti-Saloon League, the Women's Christian Temperance Union or other Christian/Temperance movements. From research I have done into Prohibition, I am aware that the Anti-Saloon League issued the poster in source D.

  2. America In 1920’s Sources Coursework

    Meaning that "freedom and opportunity" was now available to the youth, even though many didn't approve. ""Flapper," was the name given to fashionable, usually wealthy, young women whose clothes and behaviour seemed deliberately to challenge the older generation." In general the above sources gave mixed reliability and coverage of the facts.

  1. Roosevelt Sources Questions

    4) Source E is against Roosevelt. In this source the cartoonist shows a pump representing Roosevelt New Deal and is shown to be leaking. This shows that the New Deal is not working as Roosevelt told it. There are 'leaks' in the New Deal, which means there are faults with the

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework

    The representation of the American effort to limit the sale of alcohol, Uncle Sam, is utterly overwhelmed by this and cannot cope with only a hammer to break the bottles. The evidence in Source D heavily supports this message as it states that only "2836" agents were employed to enforce

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work