• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study sources E and F. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about prohibition? Source E is a personal letter written by John D. Rockefeller Jnr, who was a wealthy industrialist. In the letter, it shows that he first was campaigning for Prohibition to be introduced. In his letter, he says 'I hoped it would be widely supported by public opinion and the day would soon come when the evil effects of alcohol would be recognised'. However, later he goes on to say that he was wrong and that the introduction of Prohibition was a mistake. He admits this by saying: 'I have slowly and reluctantly come to believe that this has not been the result. Instead, drinking has generally increased....'. Source F is a speech given by John F Kramer who was the first Prohibition Commissioner and in his speech, he says that Prohibition will be obeyed and he believes that Prohibition will be a success. He says, 'The law will be obeyed in cities, large and small, and in villages'. He also believed that the enforcers of Prohibition would try their utmost best to make sure that people could not get hold of alcohol. ...read more.

Middle

Al Capone decided to take advantage of this and did so by bribing the policemen, judges and politicians. This meant that he could control the state with very little fear of arrest. Al Capone ran 'speakeasies' or illegal bars where people used to drink. This seems to agree with what Rockefeller is saying in his letters. It also says that normal people resorted to crime. Source A says: 'For no earlier law had gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans'. This source is also a passage taken from an American textbook. This means that there is a balanced view of what happened. The textbook was also produced after Prohibition was finished. This meant that it had the chance to review prohibition as a whole. Source H supports Source E because it is a statistic table and shows drinkers increased during Prohibition. Source H shows that in 1920, one year after the Volstead Act, 14,313 people were caught drunk. In 1925, 6 years into Prohibition, 51,361 people were caught drunk. This showed a 360% increase, a total of 37,048 increase. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, Source I also shows that that the number of illegal alcohol seized had drastically gone up. This possibly meant that the police were doing better jobs and were actually stopping the production of alcohol. In conclusion I can say that I think that source E is more reliable than Source F. Firstly, because it was produced towards the end of Prohibition, which meant that the Source writer, Rockefeller, had the benefit of seeing the effects of Prohibition, a hindsight. Source F was a speech and at the start of Prohibition, and the speech-giver, Kramer, was being optimistic and hopeful that Prohibition would work. Secondly, he wrote all this in a personal letter. In a personal letter it is much easier to express his personal thoughts and feelings. Kramer spoke in a speech, and so, his views were more opinionated and were motivating rather than the truth, as he attempted to make himself look stronger. Thirdly Rockerfeller had no motive for writing what he did, whereas on the other hand, Kramer did. His reasons for these are that he was the Prohibition Commissioner and he had to make sure that he enforced the law. Although both sources are useful, Source E is more authentic and is more reliable. Abbas Tejani Prohibition part (c) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    We also have to take into consideration the periods of time these sources were written in. the sources that do not show that the failure was inevitable were written before or show the start of Prohibition. Source G and H both are the statistics which may be slightly unreliable as

  2. Persuasive Speech

    hit by a drunk driver Saburido was pinned inside the burning car and suffered severe burns over 60 percent of her body. She has had 40 operations and requires more.

  1. Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

    public, makes it more reliable because the writer was not trying to convince anyone and it was his own understanding of the situation and it's his account, his experience and his beliefs of what was happening. The Source can also said to be strongly reliable because it agrees with other sources for example source A & B.

  2. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    Source C does not support source B because source C shows men in casual clothes so they were definitely not working. However it may be a Sunday so everyone is resting and they are not working so they are wearing their own clothes.

  1. History - Prohibition

    It can be said that both sources prove, to a certain extent, that prohibition was not successful. An increase in the number of seizures of stills and gallons of liquor and the number of arrests made, are shown in sources G and H respectively.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    that all sources support the view that failure of Prohibition was inevitable as some do not support this view. I will firstly discuss the sources, which do support this viewpoint, and consequently their reliability, and then will continue to discuss the sources, which do not support this view, and their reliability.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    The Prohibition commissioner probably did believe in what he was saying but we are aware now, with the benefit of hindsight, that this was not the case. This source is reliable as this was John F. Kramer's aim, however as historians who have studied Prohibition, we are aware that ultimately the cause failed.

  2. Roosevelt Sources Questions

    The cartoonist is basically trying to say New Deal is not helping America. There is also a picture of Roosevelt shown to be very happy trying to help 'Uncle Sam,' as in America, but will still take no achieve anything.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work