• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which one of these two sources do you trust more? The Battle of the Somme.

Extracts from this document...


Study source's B and C. Which one of these two sources do you trust more? Source B is in 2 parts which are both written by Haig; a day before the battle and the day of the battle. Source C on the other hand was written a few years after the battle by Private George Coppard. I personally believe source C is a trustworthy source because some statements Haig wrote were just not true from my background knowledge. A good example of this is when Haig (in source B) says: "Very successful attack this morning". I don't see how this statement can be true and can be said about a day where 20,000 men were killed with 57000 casualties. ...read more.


But how could he tell what was going on when he was 40 miles away from the front line ? This is the main point why I believe source C is more reliable as Private George Coppard was actually in The Battle of the Somme. His views could differ a bit due the fact he wrote the source a few years later with a vaguer memory. Source seems to be written to justify that the battle was different as he seems to question Haig while Haig seems to have justified how well the battle was going maybe to keep spirits high. Haig was always very cut off from the battle so he would not have had a very good picture of the ?situation this maybe why a lot of his statements on source B were incorrect as communication. ...read more.


In addition, the private may have felt resentment towards Haig for sending him into a battle where so many of his colleagues died. He may have exaggerated the amount of wire that was there. Can Haigs source be trusted in anyway though? People may believe that Haigs source is more reliable as he is meant to be a powerful leader ( so people trust him not to lie). He also wrote this closer to the time of the battle (1st July 1916). It wasn't his job to car though it was job to keep spirits high. As long as you died killing, a German he would not care which can be seen in source A. Source B shows a calmly controlled version while source C shows a chaotic version. However, why is there such a contrast between the sources? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Does Haig deserve his title as "butcher of Somme"?

    Aeroplanes and tanks are only accessories to the men and the horse, and I feel sure that as time goes on you will find just as much use for the horse - the well-bred horse - as you have ever done in the past."

  2. The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

    He had depended entirely upon his own confident instincts. He was hopelessly outnumbered by Indians, as there were over 2000 against his 260 men. He had actually been offered an extra 180 men, but had turned them down as soon as Terry offered them. This was due to his pride as well.

  1. Does General Douglas Haig deserve to be remembered as the butcher of the Somme(TM)?

    were confident with it and Haig was a product of his time in the 20th century. He did what he could and did it well and Britain is proud of him. He had good leadership skills and was well experienced with a lot of determination.

  2. Did Haig deserve his reputation

    in a quiet ch�teau, and dined on the best food available, his men lived in muddy, noisy trenches sharing their bully beef with big, bloated rats.' This type of language is very descriptive, and creates a bad image of Haig.

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    Most Indians who told of the battle said they never saw Custer and did not know who killed him- " we did not know until the fight was over that he was the white chief." Stated by Low dog. The source is contradictory because earlier we saw the source that

  2. Battle of the Somme

    We don't know if Haig was lying or was misinformed however, we definitely know that he was wrong. Haig uses words such as: splendid, confidence, instructed, informed and thorough to show how he believes his men are organised and to describe their morale.

  1. The Battle of the Somme

    The British were left with the lower wetter trench space. The constant exposure to moisture in the ground led to a bacterial infection commonly known as "trench foot" where the flesh would literally just rot on the bones. In total, there were 74,000 cases of trench foot.

  2. Does Haig deserve the title Butcher of the Somme?

    But the human cost was very high. 420,000 British soldiers and 200,000 French soldiers had been killed, almost as many as the Germans when added together. Haig pointed out that although both sides had lost huge numbers of men, the Germans could not afford so many deaths whereas the British could and therefore the Germans had been weakened.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work