• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which Tsar was more autocratic-Alexander III or Nicholas II?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Which Tsar was more autocratic-Alexander III or Nicholas II? Pobedonostsev, who instilled in them strong beliefs in autocracy and nationalism, which were reflected throughout their reign, tutored both Tsars'. When comparing the two Tsars', the impact on the political and social system is significant and hints at which Tsar was more autocratic. Alexander and Nicholas were both autocratic politically, but Alexander was keener to uphold Autocracy. This involved setting up the Okhrana, as well as tightening censorship laws. Nicholas on the other hand made a significant impact on Russian history by introducing democracy to the Russian people, through the October Manifesto. ...read more.

Middle

Yet, a deeper analysis of both regimes can lead one to conclude that it was in fact Nicholas who was more autocratic. By transforming Russia into a modern democratic state, he also made his opposition more active and demanding, especially since they saw the power of the monarch decrease gradually in the western countries. Their protests became more politically motivated and some, such as the Bolsheviks even called for the collapse of Tsarism. Alexander responded to this with further repression, for example, the execution of the Vyborg in 1907. The pessimist school of History agrees that revolution was inevitable since Tsar Nicholas became more counter-productive further into his reign. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nicholas' impressive reforms, such as the national insurance act, Duma and success in economy cannot be paralleled with Alexander's lack of reform. Subsequently, it can be deduced that Alexander was more autocratic than Nicholas. Additionally, Alexander's program of Russification and hostility towards the Jews suggests he was a vicious and despotic leader, who was bound to be overthrown. Historians have described Alexander's period as one of counter-reform and when compared with Nicholas, it suggests that Alexander was more autocratic. In conclusion, Alexander was more autocratic than Nicholas. Interestingly, Alexander announced that he would abolish further reform and maintain autocracy on the day he came to power. Therefore, a reign of ruthlessness and terror, propelled by autocracy was an inevitable consequence. K. Kiani (KofE) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why and with what results did Alexander II abolish serfdom in Russia?

    Another popular explanation as to why Alexander emancipated the serfs was that he wanted to modernize Russia. Raising the productivity of the Russian economy was one of the main motives for embarking on the emancipation of the serfs. After the 1861 emancipation, he introduced many other reforms in the military,

  2. Tsar Nicholas II

    way would not have been put into place and so change didn't happen ad therefore the people of Russia were happy with an autocracy and so were not happy with the Tsar. Also being an autocrat made it hard to govern Russia for the Tsar as he had no help

  1. "Alexander III bequeathed Nicholas II a revolution" (Trotsky) Discuss

    Alexander III sought to strengthen and centralize the imperial administration and bring it under his control. All the internal reforms which he initiated were intended to correct what he considered as the too liberal tendencies of the previous reign. In his opinion Russia was to be saved from revolutionary agitation by autocracy and Russification.

  2. Why and with what consequences did Alexander II adopt more reactionary policies in the ...

    Many opposed the Tsar's reforms and urged him to stop them before causing a revolution, as Russia had more change in 10 years altogether, than in the 150 years before. During Nicholas I's reign, there had been repressed revolutionary movements, which after his death, where performed by the students themselves.

  1. Lenin's Role in History

    Reconstruction would become impossible with the Germans on Russian soil. Therefore an armistice was signed with the Germans and peace negotiations began. Lenin ordered that any German conditions should be accepted but he had great difficulty in convincing his colleagues that this was the way forward.

  2. How valid is the view that the reign of Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    with tax payments, they could stand to loose their land and home to the State. In many cases, the taxes levied was much higher than the value of the land and due to the interest rates of 6%, many peasants found it almost impossible ever to erase the debt.

  1. 'To What Extent Did Tsar Alexander III's Reign Mark A Major Change From That ...

    the Crimean War and all the stark home truths that he had been forced to acknowledge. Whereas Tsar Alexander III ascended to the Russian throne with the sudden and unexpected death of his father and the rising upsurge in revolutionary feeling and action that was making itself felt within Russia.

  2. How successful was Tsar Alexander 2nd in Solving the problems facing Russia During his ...

    This was mainly yet again because of the Crimean War, as a lot the farm workers went off to war and did not return home again. Other industries were also suffering, which was highlighted with the lack of weapon and equipment production for the War.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work