• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which Tsar was more autocratic-Alexander III or Nicholas II?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Which Tsar was more autocratic-Alexander III or Nicholas II? Pobedonostsev, who instilled in them strong beliefs in autocracy and nationalism, which were reflected throughout their reign, tutored both Tsars'. When comparing the two Tsars', the impact on the political and social system is significant and hints at which Tsar was more autocratic. Alexander and Nicholas were both autocratic politically, but Alexander was keener to uphold Autocracy. This involved setting up the Okhrana, as well as tightening censorship laws. Nicholas on the other hand made a significant impact on Russian history by introducing democracy to the Russian people, through the October Manifesto. ...read more.

Middle

Yet, a deeper analysis of both regimes can lead one to conclude that it was in fact Nicholas who was more autocratic. By transforming Russia into a modern democratic state, he also made his opposition more active and demanding, especially since they saw the power of the monarch decrease gradually in the western countries. Their protests became more politically motivated and some, such as the Bolsheviks even called for the collapse of Tsarism. Alexander responded to this with further repression, for example, the execution of the Vyborg in 1907. The pessimist school of History agrees that revolution was inevitable since Tsar Nicholas became more counter-productive further into his reign. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nicholas' impressive reforms, such as the national insurance act, Duma and success in economy cannot be paralleled with Alexander's lack of reform. Subsequently, it can be deduced that Alexander was more autocratic than Nicholas. Additionally, Alexander's program of Russification and hostility towards the Jews suggests he was a vicious and despotic leader, who was bound to be overthrown. Historians have described Alexander's period as one of counter-reform and when compared with Nicholas, it suggests that Alexander was more autocratic. In conclusion, Alexander was more autocratic than Nicholas. Interestingly, Alexander announced that he would abolish further reform and maintain autocracy on the day he came to power. Therefore, a reign of ruthlessness and terror, propelled by autocracy was an inevitable consequence. K. Kiani (KofE) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why and with what results did Alexander II abolish serfdom in Russia?

    Another popular explanation as to why Alexander emancipated the serfs was that he wanted to modernize Russia. Raising the productivity of the Russian economy was one of the main motives for embarking on the emancipation of the serfs. After the 1861 emancipation, he introduced many other reforms in the military,

  2. Tsar Nicholas II

    way would not have been put into place and so change didn't happen ad therefore the people of Russia were happy with an autocracy and so were not happy with the Tsar. Also being an autocrat made it hard to govern Russia for the Tsar as he had no help

  1. Why and with what consequences did Alexander II adopt more reactionary policies in the ...

    Occurrences - such as the one in the St Petersburg University, where the students broke into a locked room to hold a protest meeting, marching throughout the city and boycotting lectures - were common until confronted by reactionary responses from the State to reduce the numbers of scholarships and ban student meetings.

  2. "Alexander III bequeathed Nicholas II a revolution" (Trotsky) Discuss

    However the implications of this policy were so profound that a large standing army was needed to secure it from possible enemies within. This anger was created by Alexander's political ideal of a nation containing only one nationality, one language, one religion and one form of administration; and he imposed

  1. Lenin's Role in History

    It was Lenin's clarity of determination that enabled him to seize power in the vacuum which developed after the failure of the Provisional Government. One of Lenin's main priorities when he came to power was to end the war with Germany.

  2. How successful was Tsar Alexander 2nd in Solving the problems facing Russia During his ...

    As they were in a poor, rundown condition, it meant that people could not travel around Russia as easily as they would have liked, and also that it would have been harder to rule the country if he could not hear about the problems in different areas quickly.

  1. How valid is the view that the reign of Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    This, although not overly harsh since they had to be paid for 49 years so serfs were secure in the knowledge that their lands would safely be passed on to their children, did have flaws - if a "bread-winning" family member fell ill or died and the family fell behind

  2. 'To What Extent Did Tsar Alexander III's Reign Mark A Major Change From That ...

    He was always terrified that the same fate that had met his father was to await him. Van der Kiste comments upon how the new Tsar and Tsarina barely stepped outside at first and the family would always observe the strictest security, 'such a move was symptomatic of total panic,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work