• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who do you think was the most important figure in Russian history - Lenin or Stalin? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who do you think was the most important figure in Russian history - Lenin or Stalin? Explain your answer. Both leaders play important roles in the Russian history. Lenin gave birth to Communism in Russia and helped it survive during its first critical years. He set up a one-party rule, his style of leadership was borrowed with only slight alterations by six consecutive leaders and command economy with Communism lasted till 1991. Stalin continued along Lenin's way, but took Russia more into 'extremes'. Out of the backward Russia he created an influential and industrialised totalitarian state feared by the West. He expanded the Soviet Unions' borders up to Eastern Europe and helped in the spread of Communism right 100 km from the most dominant capitalist state, the USA. He introduced Collectivisation, helped Russia win the 2nd World War, but at the same time killed millions of people, most of them during the Purges. But could all this have happened without Lenin? It is possible that without Lenin Communism would have never emerged in Russia. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin had a huge impact on Russia as well. After emerging as the new ruler in 1922, he had great plans for Russia, which mostly were fulfilled. He industrialised Russia at an incredible pace and introduced Collectivisation. Both of these new reforms were carried out by 5 of his successors. However, Lenin was the one who first introduced a state planned economy, and quite a strict one, especially during the Civil War. Therefore Stalin's ideas were ' borrowed' from Lenin, proving that without Lenin Stalin might have never introduced the same reforms and thus have the impact that it created. Stalin had a great importance in Russia's history because he expanded greatly the boundaries of the country so they included 5 whole countries from Eastern Europe and the Baltic Countries up till 1990. With this he managed to increase the hostility between Russia and Western Capitalist Countries, who felt threatened by the rapidly expanding Communism throughout the world. Thus it can be seen that Stalin played an important role in the Cold War, especially in the early stages. ...read more.

Conclusion

This style of ruling, by keeping the nation under a strict, tight control was introduced by Lenin, who also made use of the secret police to calm down any possible resistance against the new regime. The same thing happened with religion as well. As a good Communist Lenin forbade the practice of religion, and Stalin - just like Lenin - continued the suppression of religious freedom. Therefore we can see that Stalin had an important role in the Russian history, but if we look more closely, it is easy to spot that he just followed Lenin's path. All this prove, that even thou Stalin might have had a greater impact on Russia, Lenin had a greater importance than him, because he was the one who was mostly involved in the set up of Communism and putting it into practice using different new reforms. Ultimately, Stalin might have never emerged as a leader if Lenin wouldn't have gave him the position as the general secretary of the Communist Party, which allowed Stalin to win the power struggle. Therefore his importance in the Russian history is less than Lenin's. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Assess the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people.

    To consolidate his power, Lenin decided to get rid of all the enemies of the Communists. During the Civil War he fought with ex-Tsarists, Social Revolutionaries and even foreign capitalist countries. Short term impacts of the Civil War were the millions of deaths and the victory of the Reds, reinforcing the control of the Communists.

  2. Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree ...

    However, some historians disagree that Lenin is solely responsible for the birth of communist government in Russia. These historians believe that Lenin only followed the trend that was originated from the "populist terrorists in the 1860s-1880s" who predated him. Moreover, the influence of Lenin in the revolutionary movement is viewed as significant but not as absolute.

  1. Stalin and Lenin

    recover from "War Communism", while Stalin was stubborn and he rarely ever changed his economic policies and was unwilling to compromise, Lenin believed in world Revolution and hoped Communism would spread around the world, however when Stalin came into power he changed Lenin's idea of 'World Revolution' and changed it

  2. Lenin's Role in History

    Lenin approved of Trotsky's plan. Trotsky planned and organized how the Bolsheviks seized power. Could Lenin still be described as a good leader? It is clear that Trotsky was a better leader than Lenin. The Organisation of the Bolshevik troops- the Red Guards- was brilliant as they were well trained and ruthless.

  1. Stalin’s Application of Communism

    In regard to the German invasion, Stalin decided long before the defeat of Germany that "he would soon bend every effort so spread communism from Canton to Calais" (McNeal 98). This is one example of Stalin's effort to spread Communism further; nevertheless, he focused only on the Soviet Union.

  2. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    that of the Russian leaders, though Stalin proves to be a different leader. Stalin is trying to put across that he cares about his people, even after the millions of Russians he had murdered during his purges. This passage is similar to a parable, it has a moral meaning behind it.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    This argument, which incidentally can be used against democracy in general, also misses the point. How could Lenin and Trotsky "mislead" the decisive majority of society in such a way that in the short space of nine months, the Bolshevik Party passed from an insignificant minority to win the majority

  2. No other figure in recent Russian history has received the amount of vilification and ...

    Nicholas himself was terribly aware of this and upon his father's death, the new Tsar consoled himself by asking God to give him the guidance and strength to carry out the impossible burdens of ruling the complex and vastly complicated Russian empire.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work