• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

Extracts from this document...


Assignment 2 WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REICHSTAG FIRE? 1. How far is the account in source A supported by source B? Explain your answer. Source A is a detailed account of Rudolf Diels, the Head of the Prussian political police. The account was written after the war, a long period of time after this actually happened, so it's not completely reliable. In the account, Rudolf Diels explains how the Reichstag get into fire, the arrest of Van der Lubbe, Van der Lubbe confessing, Hitler's and Goering's arrival, and Goering's orders to shoot communists. The account is one-sided; it gives the information in a pro-Nazi view. Source B is an extract of Van der Lubbe's words at his trial in 1933, confessing his crime. This account is also biased because, although he confesses he has just set fire the Reichstag, he says that he acted alone and under his responsibility and that the other Communists weren't guilty. In source A, Diels explains that he found Van der Lubbe "smeared with dirt and sweating. He panted as if he has completed a tremendous task". This could be very closely linked to the fact, and as a result, of setting the fire alone, because it requires a lot of strength and time. The fact, told by Rudolf Diels, that "There was a wild triumphant gleam in the eyes of his pale, young face" is supported by Van der Lubbe's confession because it shows that he actually and really had set on the fire and that he was proud of it. In source A, Diels declares that "The voluntary confessions of Van der Lubbe made me believe he had acted alone" which is supported by Van der Lubbe's speech in source B: "I can only repeat that I set fire to the Reichstag all by myself" having in common the fact that he confessed. On the other hand, source A says that "several details suggested that Communists who had helped him start these other fires, might ...read more.


On the other hand, Source E and G prove, in some way, that Goering could have been telling lies at his trial in Nuremberg in 1946. Goering, in the party, could have been drunk and because of so, he could have talked more than he should and auto incriminates himself. Goering, could have been telling lies because, he wanted to defend himself. He is in trial and he would not want even more punishment, so he wouldn't have wanted to admit that he was the one who set fire to the Reichstag. In conclusion, the evidence shows that the sources cannot be used to evaluate if Goering was telling lies as they have all of them one-sided views: General Halder, in source E, wouldn't have wanted to be blamed for another thing, as Hermann Goering in source F, so they are to blame to each other and to help themselves from being blamed. Source G is an unreliable source, as it's published after his death and by the Communists, and surely it was published to help them gain support after they were blamed by the Nazis for the Reichstag fire. 6. Do these three sources make it more or less likely that the Nazis planned the Fire? Explain your answer. Sources H and I are extract from a history book published in 1974, so this source can be considered as a secondary source: it may not contain factual information. Source J is a photograph of what it was left of the German parliament, the morning after the fire. Source H supports the idea that the Nazis were to be blamed and that they had everything planned: "In fact, the Nazis had hoped to destroy the Communists after the election, when they would be in a stronger position to deal with them". This suggests that the Nazis had planned the arrest of the Communists before the fire, which means that they knew that the Reichstag was going to burn down fire so, they had all planned. ...read more.


The sources blaming the Nazi party or defending the Communists are also unreliable. Source B, Van der Lubbe's confession, defends the idea that he was alone and that he didn't received help from the Communists but, he was a Communist and he could have had cover them up. Source C is also an anti-Nazi cartoon but it's unreliable as it's British and may have not real facts, as it's a secondary source. Source E, which blames Goering for the fire, is not reliable because General Halder could have been trying to put the blame of the fire on someone that was not him. Source G, the supposed confession of Karl Ernst, is also an unreliable source because it was published after his death and by the Communists. There is also so much disagreement over the Reichstag fire because, as Van der Lubbe was the only one who was found, and he confessed to have acted alone, it is said that it was impossible for one man alone to set fire to the whole Reichstag. Source I, an extract from a history book published in 1974, supports this idea as the photograph in source J which shows how devastated the building was the morning after the fire. The damage shown in the photograph supports the idea that it was impossible for only one man to the fire. In conclusion, the evidence shows that it is impossible to determine who should have to be blamed for the fire because of the different versions there are and because each one contain one-sided views of the event and are totally biased. There are a little amount of facts and sources which allow, as they are not biased, to evaluate better the circumstances of the Reichstag fire. Note: I would be grateful if you could send me the mark I would get for this assignment. Thank you. ?? ?? ?? ?? Victor Alejandro Solis Sanchez Year 10 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Describe How The Nazis Used The Reighstag Fire To Increase Their Power In Germany ...

    3 star(s)

    Therefore, if the Nationalists broke away he would no longer have a majority. If the Communists were allowed back in, he would no longer have a majority. If there were fresh elections he might lose his majority. There might even be a split in the Nazi party if some members did not agree with his way of ruling the country.

  2. Describe how the Nazis used the Reichstag Fire to increase their power in Germany ...

    Hitler used this act to dictate Germany and make it a one party state. Over the following 3 months Germany changed because of the act. On the 7th of April a new law meant that Jews and political opponents were remove from their posts in the civil service.

  1. Reichstag Fire

    Also, the Reichstag fire was blamed on the communist party, who were at the time proving to be a real threat to the consolidation of the Nazis power. By blaming the communists, and having control of the national services for a certain period of time after the fire, Hitler was

  2. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    So eventually von Papen persuades Hindenburg that the most extreme Nazi polices could be resisted even with Hitler as chancellor, so Hindenburg appoints Hitler as chancellor and Von Papen as vice chancellor. Hitler got two-thirds of the majority by saying there was an emergency and the communists must not take their seats this cut out 81 MPs.

  1. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    were strong/big and the league could do nothing about it, although it originally belonged to Lithuania. Finally, the league would be worried because they would be unsure as to how Mussolini would act. For example; in 1920, Mussolini may have chosen for Italy to use force instead of go to

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    All of the accusations involving Marinus Van Der Lubbe also rely very heavily on Diels own fragile opinions, none of which are reinforced by facts and actual evidence form the time of the incident. An example of one of these indictments is when Diels states that 'He had been so

  1. Profile on the 5 leading Nazi's

    The SA (also known as stormtroopers or brownshirts) were instructed to disrupt the meetings of political opponents and to protect Hitler from revenge attacks. Captain Ernst Roehm of the Bavarian Army played an important role in recruiting these men. On 8th November, 1923, the Bavarian government held a meeting of about 3,000 officials.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Diels makes two remarks in this source that contradict each other: 'The voluntary confessions of Van der Lubbe made me believe he had acted alone' contradicts 'Several other details suggested that Communists that helped him start these other fires, might also have helped him with the Reichstag Fire'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work