• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who Was Responsible For the Reichstag Fire? - Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire? 1) Source B supports source A totally. Van der Lubbe was thought to be the one responsible for the first in the Reichstag building and with these two sources, it seems that way too because in source B van der Lubbe quoted: "I can only repeat that I set the fire to the Reichstag all by myself." This quotation from source A backs up that van der Lubbe was triumphant in his task: "there was a wild, triumphant gleam in his eyes of his eyes of his pale, young face." It also didn't help van der Lubbe's innocence by carrying communist pamphlets. However, all this is all good to say he did burn down the German Government building but is there actually any real evidence (photographic) because all this could have been made up by the National Socialist Party. 2) The communist party was growing in numbers fast. It got the third most votes from the election before the Reichstag fire behind the Social Democrats and the National Socialists. After reading this source, it is only reliable if you are arguing whether van der Lubbe was to be blamed for the fire that happened on 27th February 1932. ...read more.

Middle

To help Hitler to arrest more communists he persuaded his consul, President Hindenburg to sign " a decree for the protection of the people and the state" 5) Having read both sides of the argument, these three sources don't prove that Goring burnt down the Reichstag building. In source E, General Halder believes that Goring said, "the only one who really knows about the Reichstag fire is I, t set fire to it." In Goring's defence in source F he denied it by saying, "the whole thing is ridiculous. Even if I had started the fire, I would most certainly not have boasted about it." But the two SA officers backed up the statement made by General Halder in source G. The two SA officers revealed that Goring had an secret "underground passage leading from his house," but in the other sources from the coursework there wasn't anything else saying about this. But why would he have an underground passage leading to the German government. Did Hitler knew about this? All these are good to blame the cause of the Reichstag fire onto Goring however, in Goring's defence he just said it was "ridiculous" to blame it (the fire) ...read more.

Conclusion

No one really caught van der Lubbe red handed so it makes all of the sources unreliable. Source A agrees that van der Lubbe started the fire because Diels saw van der Lubbe, "he panted as if he had completed a tremendous task." Obviously he (Diels) thought that the "tremendous task" was the burning of the Reichstag building. If the communist party ordered him then the fire would have been the start of a communist uprising as the communist seats have been doubled in the space of four whole years. This source is backed up by source B when van der Lubbe is clearly admitting that it was all his responsibility, maybe he is faithful to his party so he said that he did it all by himself. That's why he said, "the other defendants are in this trial, but they were not in the Reichstag." So, they (other defendants) might have been in Goring's house via his "underground passage" as the two SA officers said. Even though van der Lubbe was thought to be a mad man, it is hard to think that he did burn down the German Parliament all by himself as the photo shows in source J. obviously Goring would have deny any allegations made against him in source G. 9) 10) 11) 12) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Analsysis of two sources on the Reichstag Fire.

    This would mean that he would gain more support from the anti-communist democrats at the trials. This is one reason why the source may be unreliable- in order to keep himself alive he would have altered his account to please the democrats, making it an inaccurate reflection of his thoughts/actions.

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    This disagrees strongly with Source B: 'I can only repeat that I set fire to the Reichstag all by myself. The other defendants in this trial were not in the Reichstag.' His view was that no-one had helped him. The Nazi view of events was that the Communists had planned

  1. Analysis of the Sources on the Reichstag Fire.

    He thinks he can get away with anything due to the fact that Paul Von Hindenburg was on his side. Hindenburg is on his side because when Hitler became the new chancellor of Germany on his first day as chancellor, Hitler manipulated Hindenburg into dissolving the Reichstag and calling for

  2. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    On the other hand Van der Lubbe might have received help from other communists to set on the fire and that he, in source B, was covering them up. 2. How reliable is this account? Explain your answer. The account in source A was written a long period of time

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Obviously, Diels won't be trusted for what he wrote. But, if Diels tried to be anti-Nazi, he would be mistrusted as well. As a result, the point of view of the account Diels put himself into may not represent of what he truly believes.

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Anyone who stands in our way will be cut down. Every communist will be shot or hanged. Everybody supporting the communists must be arrested.' This quote could not have been precisely recalled from this great a period of time ago, therefore it was fabricated, guessed, or recorded in some other form of unpublished or unknown documentation.

  1. Study all the sources.

    This figure represents the Nazis. The body on the floor, of which the officer is standing over, represents the Jews. The third figure in the cartoon is a poor, defenceless woman, who is sitting on a box with her hands tied behind her back with a gag in her mouth.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    the real criminals to take the attention away from himself: He quotes Goering as saying 'There will be no mercy now. Anyone who stands in our way will be cut down. Every Communist will be shot or hanged. Everybody supporting the Communists must be arrested,' making Goering out as a 'bad guy', and thus drawing the attention away from himself.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work