• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915? A) Plan of the Investigation (2 marks) On the 25th April 1915, the British landed troops at Helles and Anzac on the Gallipoli peninsular. This began a ten-month campaign in which more then 100,000 allied and Turkish troops were killed, and a quarter of a million wounded. In hindsight, people are searching for a scapegoat on which this tragic loss of life can be placed. (This is important, as this blame is a huge burden to place upon one specific person.) Several people are seen as responsible, (e.g. Churchill, General Sir Ian Hamilton). In this investigation, I hope to discover who really was the force behind this dramatic battle in which a generation of men were totally obliterated. To do this, I shall be looking at the particular events during this campaign that went wrong, such as the landings, and all in all, bad leadership. My sources will include the film "Gallipoli"1 and various books. B) Summary of Evidence (5 marks) By the spring of 1915, the Western Front was completely gridlocked. Neither side could find any means of surprise attack, which ultimately resulted in costly and unproductive direct attacks on well-armed defences. ...read more.

Middle

John Laffin was an Australian historian, with expertise in 20th Century forces. He spent most of his life researching the First World War, and looking at various perspectives on controversial battles, such as Gallipoli. Its main limitations however, are that it is an Australian writing, who therefore saw everything from an Australian point of view. Both of theses sources were written after the event happened, and so, are not necessarily accurate. Also, with the film, many people generally see a film, and believe that is exactly the way that particular event took place. This can be seen as a positive or a negative thing. The book was a very useful source, as it provided in depth analysis of the events, which took place, whereas the film is limited to a certain amount of time etc, and therefore, could not include all the necessary details. D) Analysis Generally, the tragedy at Gallipoli is looked at through the eyes of ordinary soldiers, scholars, military historians, naval historians, journalists, politicians and senior Service officers. Perhaps the most interesting to look at, is that of the men that lived through the experience as ordinary soldiers. One soldier's diary read: "Perhaps as the years roll by, we will be remembered as the expedition that was betrayed by jealousy, spite, indecision and treachery. ...read more.

Conclusion

This plan persuaded the war council victory was possible, and the attack was formulated. 4 Attacks from sea lasted from 19th February until 13th March 1915. 5 Australian and New Zealand Army Corps. Although these were the majority of soldiers, the campaign also involved men from Britain and Ireland. A more minor role was played by the Indian and French soldiers. 6 Mustapha Kemal 7 This was the result of the Ottoman Empire being known as the "Sick man of Europe". 8 The commander of the First Division. The first Australian to be promoted to major general, and the first to command a division. 9 A commanding officer that landed that afternoon. 10 General Sir Ian Hamilton 11 Source: DAMN THE DARDANELES! The Agony at GALLIPOLI. John Laffin 12 Source: The Encyclopedia of Military History. R. Ernest Dupuy and Trevor N. Dupuy 13 Major-General W. P. Braithwaite was Hamilton's Chief-of Staff. 14 The Administrators controlled areas such as supply, shipping, water, hospital services etc. 15 Strangely enough, this was not far from the truth. It was thought that war was far to complex a business to leave in the hands of the fighting generals! 16 General Head Quarters 17 Both were battleships, from where the battle was commanded. Hamilton in fact, controlled the entire operation from a ship, and never once stepped ashore! Rochelle Enticknap Anglo European School 1 History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Trench Diary Assignment.

    a mile long, I stood at the back of the line and waited patiently. It felt like I had been lining up for a week, but finally it was my turn. I gave my personal details including my age, unlike many others I didn't need to lie about my age.

  2. Reasons the Dardanelles campaign failed to achieve its military objectives.

    This would be a problem throughout the whole campaign. He had even announced in 1911 that: "It should be remembered that it is no longer possible to force the Dardanelles, and nobody would expose a modern fleet to such peril."

  1. The failures of Gallipoli

    The initial attack and the second attack had four months difference giving the Turks time to get ready for the next attack. There were also rough seas a lot of the time and it was difficult to wait for the right weather due to the decrease of morale in the soldiers.

  2. Why did the Gallipoli campaign of 1915 fail?

    Another haunting factor in the campaign's downfall is the novelty of the situation. From a geographical perspective, the Turks had an immediate advantage, because of their positioning on the cliffs above the beaches. This made it impossible to attack easily, as the Anzac troops could not charge uphill, and secondly made it easy to defend for the Turkish soldiers.

  1. Which of the four reasons given below was most to blame for the failure ...

    an ad hoc fashion, which meant that the allocation of the best commanders was not included. The commanders who were in charge of the attacks on Gallipoli were not very good and were chosen very late. General Hamilton, for example, was only appointed six weeks before the attacks began.

  2. Australia's role in World War II - The Gallipoli Campaign.

    Their plan was to clear small enemy forces for their positions on the hills, then the soldiers would destroy the artillery which was stopping the ships from entering the strait. So in the early hours of the morning of the 25th April 1915,the first wave of ANZACS a party of

  1. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    Not everybody could sleep in a dugout and so they made funk holes, which are small holes carved out, with a shovel, of the side of the trench where one person would sleep. When it was raining, soldiers would drape a waterproof sheet over the opening and would rest in there funk hole.

  2. The main reason for the failure of the Gallipoli campaign was poor planning Do ...

    Another factor was the strength of the Turkish defenders as acknowledged by a source: ?the Turks were ready for us and every Turkish Rifle and machine-gun began murderous fire?. The British underestimated the Turkish, who were able to use the terrain to their advantage by hiding in manmade holes and ambushing soldiers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work