Who was the most influential figure in the Civil Rights Movement in the USA in the 1950s and 1960s? What impact did he/she have?

Authors Avatar

TULIP DAS

Who was the most influential figure in the Civil Rights Movement in the USA in the 1950s and 1960s? What impact did he/she have?

Until the 1950s, African American faced discrimination in every aspect of their lives. In practice, many US lawmakers and law enforcers approved systematic segregation according to race. This resulted in African Americans becoming victims of mob rule and lynching, being forced to use separate entrances to buildings, being separated in theatres and on buses, denied access to "whites only" swimming pools, hospitals, school and even cemeteries.

During the 1950s and 1960s, African Americans, along with other people of other racial groups within the United States, embarked on a campaign to change this situation. This campaign, the Civil Rights Movement, challenged the discrimination and fought to achieve the equality that the American constitution promised for its entire people

One of the principle leader and the most influential figure in the civil rights movement was Martin Luther King Jr.

Born in Atlanta, Georgia, on January 15, 1929, the eldest son of Martin Luther King, Sr., he entered Morehouse College at the age of 15 and was ordained a Baptist minister at the age of 18. Graduating from Crozer Theological Seminary as class president in 1951, he then did postgraduate work at Boston University. King's studies at Crozer and Boston led him to explore the works of the Indian nationalist Mohandas K. Gandhi, whose ideas became the core of his own philosophy of non-violent protest. That same year the Supreme Court of the United States outlawed all segregated public education, and in the wake of that decision, the segregated South was soon challenged in every area of public adaptation. In 1955 King, who had just received his Ph.D. degree, was asked to lead a bus boycott in Montgomery. The city's black leaders had organized the boycott to protest against enforced racial segregation in public transport after the arrest of Rosa Parks, a black woman who had refused to give up her seat to a white passenger. In the course of the 381-day action King was arrested and jailed, his home was bombed, and many threats were made against his life. The boycott ended in 1956 with a mandate from the Supreme Court outlawing all segregated public transport in the city.

Join now!

The Montgomery boycott was a clear victory for non-violent protest, and King emerged as a highly respected leader. Mindful of this, black clergymen from across the South organized the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), with King as its president.

On a visit to India in 1959 King was able to work out more clearly his understanding of Gandhi's principle of non-violent persuasion, which King had determined to use as his main instrument of social protest. The next year he gave up his pastorate in Montgomery to become co-pastor (with his father) of the Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

Good. Spelling, grammar and punctuation are all sound and the essay itself is well organised. However I would advise a more concise order which allows an examiner to clearly identify your view, reasoning and conclusions.

Fairly good, high level of biographical information as well as detail of certain events during his campaign and their overall impact. I would like to see a few comparisons to other significant leaders, Marcus Garvey, Malcolm X and W.E.B Du Bois explored further. Why did you choose King? However, on the whole, a decent level of analysis here.

A solid response to the given question; and provides a clear and definitive answer. However, I feel there is too much 'background info' (wiki-drivel) at the start which isn't great. The main focus should be on what MLK did and evaluating his impact on the movement throughout. For example, discussing the 'March on Washington', his skills as an orator as well as some percieved negatives (Selfish? Womaniser? Hypocrite?).