Why and how did the north east of Ireland diverge from the rest of Ireland in the later nineteenth century?

Authors Avatar

Christina Moore year 2 History

(1559 words)

 Why and how did the north east of Ireland diverge from the rest of Ireland in the later nineteenth century?

To prove that there was a definite diverges of the North east from the rest of Ireland, there is a need to look at the events and changes that took place up until the actual partician in 1920.  To examine how it affected both north and south and to investigate the methods used by Unionists to achieve their goals.

The Home Rule period saw an increasingly strong line being drawn between the Northeast and the rest of the country.  This was caused firstly by the Electoral Franchise opened up by the British in 1884 and 1885 to include much of the working class. (1) The result was more Catholics could vote than ever before and that the power of the elections was changing.  The southern Protestants from Leinster, Munster and Connaught were wealthy landlords, business men and large tenant farmers, and although they were economically powerful they were in minority compared with the north.  Therefore unionists who were opposed to Home Rule would be in majority were there were other Protestants.  Whereas in Ulster Protestants were big in number but divided in social class.  Without question the Northeast was the only area that had such an electoral makeup.  And in spite of there being many Unionists in the South there was not enough to control the votes.  On the other hand they had influence amongst the British Conservatives and good at persuading their vote against Home Rule.  Unionism therefore became a political force confined to Ulster and as industry flourish Belfast became a thriving port. (2)  However after Catholic Emancipation, it was apparent that Protestants would be in minority in any all Ireland Parliament.  

Unquestionably the rise of the Ulster Unionism was a direct response to the Home Rule movement.  Since Home Rule meant ‘Rome Rule’, with the view of Catholic Bishops telling Catholic MP’s how to vote.  This petrified Protestants as they felt they would be under represented in Parliament.  In addition Irish Protestants feared they would loose their civil and religious liberty if Home Rule was granted. Many Irish conservatives and Protestants such as Orangemen, Protestant landowners and Ulster industrialists were all in opposition to Home Rule.  (3) And it would be true to say that each group of Unionists had different perceptions on the results of Home Rule.  For example British unionists were imperialists and thought that Home Rule would weaken Britain.  On the other hand Southern Unionists feared loosing their land and position.  And Ulster Unionists were afraid of Catholic reign and felt that Catholics were too backward to rule. (4) Furthermore these fears made them determined, and the disagreements they had in the past were brushed aside to form a more united bond to oppose Home rule.

Join now!

Meanwhile up until 1880 Ulster Elections were fought mainly between Liberals and Conservatives, and when Gladstone declared for Home rule in 1886, alarm bells rang.  Unionists also saw the influence the Catholic Church had and the key role they played in party branches, there were fears about the power that they would have.  Up until now Unionists had felt safe but now threatened, so a number of conservative landowners formed the Ulster Loyalist Anti Repeal Union (ULARU).  (4) And southern Unionist’s founded the Irish Loyal Patriotic Union, although this group failed to make any impact on the 1885 elections. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay