• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why and to what extent did the British Government attempt to hide the effects of the Blitz from the people of Britain?

Extracts from this document...


Why and to what extent did the British Government attempt to hide the effects of the Blitz from the people of Britain? This essay will look at why and to what extent censorship and propaganda is used during the Blitz. The Blitz was a period of sustained bombing of the major cities of Britain by the Nazis. The east end of London was one of the places that was very badly affected; buildings were destroyed and many home were left without gas, electricity or water. In 1939, the British Government assed the Emergency Powers Act; this meant that they took control of all forms of media e.g. newspapers, magazines, radio etc. They also tapped phone lines, they did all this because the Germans wanted to bomb them until they gave up - trying to demoralise people. They British government tried it counter act this by hiding the effects to keep peoples morale's up. People would have had low morale's due to several factors one of these being that most of what they could see around them was destruction and death hardily helpful when trying to keep ones spirits up. ...read more.


They did often show images every so often of destroyed buildings for example a picture showing a woman and child coming out of an Anderson Shelter unscathed while everything around them has been reduced to rubble. Here an exception has been made because it is probably trying to putting forward the message that the shelters the government have provided and prevent deaths, therefore encouraging people to use them. This was also one of Churchill's specific examples of when a photo showing destruction could be used. An example of a photo depicting a patriotic act is a little boy putting a union jack flag in the middle of all the rubble. This image would have probably been shown as it showed this little boy still flying the flag and supporting the country even though his home has been destroyed. One thing that was never was photos of bagged up bodies. This was never allowed as it would have shown people about the deaths and reinforeced the fact with a mental image of it that lots of people were dying. ...read more.


Another things to look at is clips from actually reports has them talking in a cheery voice maybe in an attempt if they sound cheery people will become more cheery to. Although the government didn't cover up the effects and still reported them, many people were angry as it seemed this way slightly, almost as if the hardships they were facing weren't being recognized. As if they were trying to pretend it wasn't happening at all and this had a negative effect as it made people angry at the government which is the last thing they wanted in a time like this. In conclusion I can say that the most important reason they tried to cover it up was to keep the general populations morale up and although they did show images of destruction it was generally covered up, so they covered more up than what was allowed to be shown. I believe that this would have been a necessary thing to do at the time also due to the fact that there would have been spies so they can't allow too much to be published. By Rebecca Staple ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Assimilation. The problem with immigration in Britain was that the people werent coming from ...

    This added to the frustration of the English population and was a major downside to the success of assimilation. Source H shows James Walvin a British historian talking about the concept of assimilation. When he began to talk about assimilation he proved to be against it.

  2. To What extent was Britain a Democracy by 1914

    ���5�z�(c)�h_~Ì�,~ ��q���"y�Ҵ K["�!�v���[�1/4^n�'H�"��3/43/4T�=��K<m�C���=â�qa����w�~����^a-�"���B�K�V�ͬ ��[�/Ư�6����;F��<[.�}��t?�z�" � ...3/4�&���R�]�,Ì ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½:Ü·'W�+O�%u�î¶ï¿½1/2�Zզ�D��7o�w�ϭ���3/4��G]��|G�+|[O�� ��� Ä­$�:d��}~i�E�}*[YR��fm�I$�1�Ø>5�� |p���I�1��R��Z^��xs�6��ֳ4-�3/4{�`�- ���d 'e$��'�s����.�B���+h�'�>"�1/2WA���nQl/.1/4�(y�6�0�!2h�?�'�{�w� !���"E� :�(c)s"'�~���i�n|��G��[}�A(tm)åºï¿½ydW#k\h�4����],�mu�"1/2��Dcn��1/2�|�v�VKum�M���^^~֭ܺ�� ��|Dд{� i�K;Ae,?�{,e�1/2�O'$VDe,�[���������c� ~)�Ð�~Ӭ���*�1/2���)e3�]<�"���"��(r) ���3/47� |C� x��`�� �y����>-��'+���7�1/4"h��1$�7-������� 7�è§ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½>.������u/�Åا�4Q^>�%�v��\�,�n�Ѣ�IU �-ٷ����y�����j��U��K���'�?��n]K⦵e�'��N�3/4...8��m! ���+q�g}�dm3�'�(���{(r)��P� ���x-�� ��1����Zͤ"�W�1��Ò�K"�ɹ#��-1/4�E���z"\jگ�ߥxF�3�j�D��7�g�u�h�'x#h�Aw��((r).b.�m �t.�k_�(Sx��=k���o��:L:1/2�Ʒ����(c)� �-im�X��#\$'��N��B6�SV"kM��i'�M^����î¤ï¿½ï¿½3/4�oM��v�E�3/4W��ς3/4,��-K��k|M��1/49�F���_�M$H���gK�g���P�+�Vx�g��G�ß?����X|)�~%�(�׵ +���3/4 �(r)�v0��o2-3/4�g�'��p��"����~�?i C�uٳ�3/4:�-<Gf"��3/4�Z��po,9�0�{���b&dWA"� �-Y��G���>)�b���F�(c)x`x�/_]Yx [Yu{T��A�Y��5���w�y[��A��I:�U"�-e"Q׵�t"4���S�U���J�����[��Q� >=~�7~$��"� x���=...�Õ�t=7�--o���R�XL&�(tm)ÙΡ�T�`-�3/4"x� ^�.���j���t��3/4��tÇ�i�n"l),R5���(c)3�3#"� w��o��l�~6����xo�>�u'w |)�uHuh-�b�'u1��(tm)��/-�my�0���i�=��(r)��5�OO�^<g...41/4G����Z1/4��qnd�I��& UeS�\ k;�-��o���=�w�1/4(tm)U �Qi�۷d�\����W�^;����o�3/47o�:7��x�-*���z"��{�\ �%�Å�4�'��F���U-!>��%�;�~������m{��" �gL�5M>����̴�i���1���GL"��f �OÅ��K�)�u�3/4�~�G_F�G�ı|/�,V0"���;g��'���� ��"Qn`o��/ ~��Q_-k��h��"1/4;��(c)j-V���O��ȷ����U� q<�5ʬ��y�-d�R(c)

  1. To what extent was appeasement justified?

    The aim of the League of Nations was to stop war, improve people's quality of lives and jobs, disarmament and enforce the Treaty of Versailles. The continuous process of appeasement proved that the League of Nations could not keep up to their words, exposed their weakness and that they were not trustworthy.

  2. In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of the ...

    However, the government did not feel it necessary to block the broadcast - which was well within their power to do, or attempt to divert the attention of the growing audiences tuning in hoping that by ensuring the BBC remained a trustworthy corporation, the public would largely dismiss the broadcast as blatant Nazi propaganda.

  1. Were the police to blame for Jack the Ripper not being caught

    much as they can, (or that they aren't, but want the public to think they are'. However, if the police used the advice of one letter which was to use fingerprints, they could've found his prints on a crime scene, then search for him.


    He was a filmmaker employed by the Ministry of Information. He produced many films advising people about the regulations, but part of his work was also to make films that would inspire people to want to continue the fight. They publicized the work of volunteers and described what life would

  1. Sourcework - The impression that the British faced the Blitz with courage and unity ...

    They also tried to boost morale by introducing the Home Guard with proper uniforms and equipment that made people feel important and responsible. 5. Study all sources and use your own knowledge. The impression that the British face the Blitz with courage and unity is a myth.

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the response of the British people ...

    If your house has just been destroyed you certainly wouldn't be smiling. You would be angry and annoyed. Not smiling and sticking your thumbs up. I think that the government took this photo to send out to all the people who had, unfortunately had their house's destroyed, to show even through their devastation they were still smiling.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work