• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Appeasement?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Britain follow a policy of appeasement towards Germany? Between 1935 and 1939 Britain followed a policy of appeasement towards Germany. Primarily to prevent another horrific war. However there were many more advantages to the policy of appeasement. Firstly it was vital for Britain to avoid another war, people still vividly remembered the horrors of World War 1. Losing a whole generation of young fit males, weakened economy, the overall hatred that warfare instils. Many were still recovering from the heartache that war produces, Psychologically Britain needed time. None of the pain could be repeated and therefore Appeasement was acceptable. To avoid war at all costs. ...read more.


Britain was vulnerable to air attack and pictures of the Spanish civil war raised public awareness; anyone could now be killed in war, women, children, the elderly. Everybody was at risk and defence was not tough enough as yet. Britain needed time to re-build and modernize as warfare had changed immensely. A contemporary army needed to be constructed New technology such as radar required time and effort. Planes needed building. Appeasement could give Britain this option. Britain's economy had still not fully recovered from the Wall Street crash and many were living in poverty. If war was inevitable then at least it could be delayed by this policy. ...read more.


A generation of young were conscious they would have to fight, which therefore meant death. People such as Chamberlain and Daladier believed in peace and believed another war would "destroy civilization." This view was shared by a vast amount of British citizens. War was not a popular possibility at this moment in time. Peace was the fresh mindset, appeasement meant peace. Overall, appeasement was simply the correct policy for Britain between the years of 1935 and 1939. It gave Britain time to regain strength as a nation. The most important aspect of appeasement was the fact it allowed Britain to re-arm, as war was an inevitable product of the Treaty of Versailles. Britain needed the time to adapt and build for modern war. Appeasement gave them this and therefore prepared them for the unavoidable. Anthony Marcou Miss Scott Centre Number: 16435 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Part of Austria went to Italy. Both new countries had to reduce their military capability and both states had to pay reparations for war damage. However, the figures involved were nowhere near as high as the figure imposed on Germany.

  2. To what extent was appeasement the correct policy during the 1930s?

    For example, Britain and France were still suffering from the economic effects of the Wall Street Crash in 1939. Britain and France did not have enough money for the reparations of another war, so they felt that the policy of appeasement would prolong peace until their economies were able to cope.

  1. Was the Policy of Appeasement correct?

    to get some clothes to make itself less vulnerable and Britain taking the clothes away from Germany making sure that she is always vulnerable. This ideology is portraying Germany as a sub-human who should be eternally shamed for the work of previous generations, a moral argument against appeasement.

  2. Evacuation of Children

    Firstly, it is an interview in 1988. At this time the government did not have censorship, so it doesn't show any clear reason why the teacher interviewed would lie about anything. She says "All you can hear was the feet of the children and a kind of murmur, because the children were too afraid to talk".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work