• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why could the site of Cromford be successfully developed by Richard Arkwright?

Extracts from this document...


Why could the site of Cromford be successfully developed by Richard Arkwright? Richard Arkwright was the first to successfully create a system of mass production. His factories and his methods were widely copied throughout England and around the world. But why was his mill in Cromford so successful? The following essay will explore this. In order to begin developing the Cromford site, Arkwright needed money. To find a financer for his idea he travelled to Nottingham and met Jeddidiah Strutt, owner of a stocking-making business (a big business in the 17th century in Nottingham). With Strutt's money, Arkwright set up a spinning factory in 1769. Without this capital, Arkwright couldn't have set up the factory in Cromford in 1771 where he used his 'spinning-frames' (which could have hindered the mass production of yarn and thread), and he would also not have been able to hire so much cheap labour - a key factor to the success of his factory at Cromford. ...read more.


Arkwright's success was also due to choice of sites. He and Strutt opened a cotton spinning mill in Nottingham, famous for stocking-making. This was important because it gave him a big market to work towards. Then in 1771, Arkwright and Strutt opened a mill in Cromford, where the whole mill was water-powered. This site was important because he could expand the factory and town, and increase profits without having to waste money on horse power. Arkwright set up a horse-powered factory in Nottingham which didn't require skilled operators. However, Arkwright wanted a continually powered factory that still would not need skilled operators. In December 1771, Arkwright opened the Cromford mill, where there was a cheap, continual power available - water. He leased the right to use water from the River Derwent. ...read more.


Without this technology, Cromford could have never been developed. Arkwright's development of Cromford was successful because it already had many advantages. The site had access to water (from derelict mines and the River Derwent) - important for factory power. Cromford was large, providing him with space to build a working community. It was easier to develop Cromford as it already had a number of required features. I conclude that the Cromford site was successfully developed by Arkwright because of the amount of capital invested in the site and the loyalty of his workers. Arkwright spent the capital effectively to obtain efficient power and cheap labour, and he was able to invest money into the site and continually improve it. Arkwright won workers' trust and loyalty, and they helped to develop Cromford into a profitable industrial town. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How useful is visible evidence in explaining the development of power at Styal Mill ...

    For instance, the confusion about the gassometer and the horse gin. Also, how stables were installed at the Mill even though they didn't use horsepower. All of this is misleading and can present incorrect statements. Strengths and weaknesses Strengths There are many different strengths and weaknesses of visible evidence.

  2. Do you think Lumsdale was a successful choice for the site of these mills?

    starting to become largely superseded by steam power and even if a more efficient power source had been invented, it didn't benefit the Lumsdale valley as there was no coal in the valley and no easy way of transporting it to the valley.

  1. How useful are the site and other sources in showing how far Cromford village ...

    I believe that this source is quite very reliable as the artist has no reason to lie about the true scenery of Cromford. This Source can be supported by Source 15 which indicates that the remoteness of Cromford may have been one of its advantages.

  2. Is Quarry Bank Mill a typical example of manufacture and production in a British ...

    These included; the Mill Manager, and the Overlookers who were in charge of each room. Operated machinery could be found within each room which prepared the raw cotton. There was the 'Carders', of whom the men worked the machines to straighten the cotton fibres.

  1. Evacuation was a success

    36 1.55 - 1.59 | 1 36 1.60 - 1.64 || 2 72 1.65 - 1.69 |||| 4 144 1.70 - 1.74 | 1 36 1.75 - 1.79 |||| 5 180 || 2 72 1.8 - 1.84 ||| 3 108 1.85 - 1.89 | 1 36 With reference to table

  2. why was richard arkwirght so succsessful

    He built the Greyhound hotel. ? He had two annual balls. ? He gave each family 1 weeks holiday ant the end of each ball. ? Kept the employees healthy. The spinning frames where powered by horsepower but although horsepower worked well to power the spinning frame Arkwright found something that was ever better.

  1. Why did Samuel Greg establish a cotton mill at Styal in 1784? ...

    that children 9-13years could only work a 48hour week, so what Samuel was doing was illegal. With Samuel being so truthful about breaking the law this probably means that his other answers are the truth, as he doesn't try to hide anything.

  2. Why was the site for Quarry Bank Mill chosen by Samuel Greg?

    In total Samuel Greg had �36,000. This amount meant that Greg was in a fortune financial position. Samuel Greg knew that 90% of businessmen who went into cotton spinning at this time went bankrupt but Samuel Greg was fortunate to have a reserve of cash to keep him going in an industry that had a history depression and which might fail.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work