• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why, despite the Suffragette activity, had women not gained the vote by the outbreak or the First World War?

Extracts from this document...


Why, despite the Suffragette activity, had women not gained the vote by the outbreak or the First World War? There were three main reasons that British women had not gained the vote by the start of World War one, these three aspects all contribute towards the outcome of the situation. One of the main reasons the women didn't gain the vote, was to do with the tactics and methods used by the Suffragettes. The Suffragette women portrayed the female population to be irrational, emotional and out of control. Source D, a book written by the famous suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst, suggests women did use 'violent campaigning'. This campaigning included; Bombing Politicians homes, Arson attacks, Vandalism throughout the country, Hunger strikes and in some horrific cases Suicide. ...read more.


The second reason women did not gain the vote was also to do with the womenfolk and their tactics. The Suffragists were the complete opposite to the Suffragettes. Although they were fighting for the same cause the tactics used were very different. Compared to the terrorist styles of fighting on the Suffragettes behalf, the Suffragists used a quantity of peaceful methods. These were methods such as Peaceful protests, national advertising and public speaking. None of these ways caught anybody's attention to the extent of full media coverage. In source D, Emmeline Pankhurst says, referring to the media exposure, 'it had never been that before. Now the newspapers are full of us'. This shows that no real outcome had evolved from the suffragist campaign. ...read more.


It was also well known that MP's were against votes for women. Source E, part of a speech by an MP, states 'I have no hesitation in voting against the principle of giving the vote to women'. Sadly, for the women, this was not just the view of one man. Many members of parliament thought this and this meant that none or little votes for women's votes would be cast. Around in the early 1900's, when the women were campaigning, there were many other issues affecting politics. There was a possible chance that the first World War against Germany was about to start. Also there were other strikes to do with employment all over the United Kingdom and on top of that, Ireland was in flames. The women's drastic performance at this time was no reason to consider the vote. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tom Bletsoe - 10Gi ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Gallic war

    If this view is true, then Antony grossly underestimated Octavian. Octavian's temporary collaboration with the republicans * Political situation in Rome at this time was unstable: * republicans: * Brutus/Cassius: left for the east (Syria/Macedonia) to raise troops/naval forces * Cicero: returned to Rome; gave series of speeches (Philippics)

  2. To what extent did the Vikings deserve this bad press? How would you characterise ...

    In order to do this, leadership had to be established, and with it, a constant system of government. The Franks were among the most successful at achieving this, and were able to defend themselves effectively for a period of time, before internal political struggles became the cause of a weakened line of defence.

  1. Charles the first was completely responsible for the civil war- to what extent is ...

    This is when parliament released a new set of demands which reduced the power of bishops, plus the advisors to the king should be employed by parliament so they can trust the employee. The grand remonstrance was scarcely passed by 159 members of parliament saying yes and 149 members saying

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

    It gathered momentum to their policy of 'deeds not words' where as the suffragists refusal to use violence conveyed their beliefs of 'make haste slowly with persuasion'. October 13th 1908 or the so called 'rush' on the House of Commons was a dramatic illustration of the differences between the methods of the suffragists and the suffragettes.

  1. In what ways were the lives of children on the home front affected by ...

    This is reliable because you can see how children are affected in a positive way ,you can trust this source because many children were part of the cog scheme, so this could have been done for propaganda by the government and how children worked in the war effort but you

  2. There is plenty to suggest that women never got away from their traditional role. ...

    were scared of tunnels so relied on men who told funny stories about them meaning that Neil Demarco was correct. This could be reliable because it is an account by a person who was there at the time and proves DeMarco is correct however the book was published after the

  1. Berlin Blockade

    (The Cold War, Harper Collins) Communist Berlin now needed supplies for about 2 million people. Approximately 4,000 tons of medicines, food, clothes and fuel were needed daily. The American congress voted for Marshall Aid. They decided to go airborne. Everyday 600 tons were being flown into East Berlin, every 90 seconds a plane landed with supplies.

  2. How and why writers have explored different views of the First World War. ...

    It also shows that the soldiers know they are going to die because otherwise they would never confide in each other like they do. I think that Blackadder goes forth is very well written because it is a way of showing how serious and awful world war one was but saying it in a comical way.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work