• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did ‘Bloody Sunday’ Take Place? (Russian History Sources Question)

Extracts from this document...


Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place? a) A historian studying Bloody Sunday would probably find these two sources equally useful, depending on what they wanted to find out. Source A is an extract from the Tsar's diary on the 21st and 22nd of January 1905. It shows the historian the Tsar's perspective and opinion about what is happening at the time of this event. That the Tsar is either unaware of the situation in St Petersburg, or that he doesn't appreciate the significance of it, or he could have been uninformed of the situation. "Since yesterday all the factories and workshops in St Petersburg have been on strike. Troops have been brought in to strengthen the garrison. The workers have conducted themselves calmly hitherto. At the head of the workers is some socialist priest: Father Gapon." This was written by the Tsar on the 21st of January. It shows that the Tsar knew little about what was happening in St Petersburg, but is aware that something is happening and that the workers are on strike and are being lead by 'some' socialist priest: Father Gapon. This also shows that he isn't in touch with his people, as he has never heard of Father Gapon before and Father Gapon is reasonably well known as he took over the running of the St Petersburg Zubatov union in May 1903 and also formed the 'Assembly of Russian Factory Workers of St Petersburg' in 1904. This scheme helped the poor, sick and the elderly. It is useful for the historian as it shows the Tsar's opinion and what he knew about the crisis that was happening in St Petersburg whilst he was away. ...read more.


They expected to win. They assumed that with the population three times the size of that of Japan and with the resources of a huge empire they would defeat the Japanese. " This shows how the Tsar wasn't particularly interested, and was very laid back about this situation. People lost confidence in the Tsar , and were angry about all the lives that were lost, and about how badly they did in the war. "The war became a nightmare for the Tsarist autocracy. Instead of being a diversion from the problems in Russia, it added immeasurably to them" This quote sums up the problems which the war caused for Russia, adding to their many problems, as they entered expecting an easy victory. Source H is a cartoon showing the Tsarist system, which was published in Switzerland by exiled opponents of the Tsar. This source could be biased as it is drawn by opponents of the Tsar, however, it is somebody's opinion of the hierarchy system in Russia. There are five tiers, with the royal family on the top with a comment of: "We rule you", then underneath are the church with "We mislead you", followed by the army with "We shoot you" and then the capitalists with "We do the eating", and at the very bottom are the workers, supporting the whole pile. This cartoon suggests that the many workers are holding up the whole of Russia, with the small royal family at the top giving out the orders, and everybody underneath obeys. There are also some workers that are starting to walk away, there are some carrying banners and flags, trying to revolt. ...read more.


The cities soon became overcrowded and the living and working conditions rapidly decreased. For example in 1890 there were 1,883,000 tons of petroleum being sold in Russia and by 1900 there were 10,385,000 tons of petroleum being sold in Russia. That's a huge increase of 449%, which had the impact on the workers, which had the impact on the living and working conditions. Source J is part of Tsar Nicholas II's coronation speech. He talks about the zemstva and how the people have made their voices heard, and he goes onto say that he "will devote all my strength to the welfare of the people". He does not mention the view that Bloody Sunday was caused by bad living and working conditions. Source K is a map to show Russia in 1910. I don't think this source either agrees or disagrees with the statement of Bloody Sunday was caused by poor living and working conditions. I don't think that this source is closely linked to Bloody Sunday. Overall, I think that I can conclude that the sources C, D, H and I all support the statement of 'Bloody Sunday was caused by bad living and working conditions' well, however source A, B, E, F, J and K don't either agree or disagree with the statement, but don't give enough, if any information about the view that Bloody Sunday was caused by poor living and working conditions. Although source G isn't directly linked with Bloody Sunday, it does give an alternative reason why Bloody Sunday was caused. ?? ?? ?? ?? G.C.S.E HISTORY COURSEWORK-ASSIGNMENT 2 Study unit: Russia 1905-1941 Amanda Hilsdon 10V ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Free essay

    Bloody Sunday

    The Saville report had 8 yrs of investigations run by lord Saville. The report interviewed over 1500 people including soldiers, Protestants, Catholics, civilians and IRA members. The leaders and members of the Saville enquiry were from Australia and New Zealand.

  2. What was the impact of Bloody Sunday?

    The violence also led to the Irish (Northern Irish) parliament in Stormont being suspended and direct rule from the British Parliament in Westminster was introduced. Finally the last but probably one of the most important short time points was that a report was set up to investigate Bloody Sunday and who was to blame.

  1. How far do these two sources agree about what happened at Sharpeville on the ...

    Source A mentions that the people were giving the thumbs up sign, which we can see in the picture in source D. The crowd in source D seems more vigorous then that of source C, these could be because these photographs have been taken from different scenes or that the photographs could have been taken at different times.

  2. What Happened at Sharpeville on 21st March 1960?Massacre or Self-Defence?

    Similarities between C and A are also shown because of the peaceful signs of protest. "The people were shouting the Pan Africanist slogan, Izwe Lethu (Our Land)," However, the police could have perceived this as threatening and intimidating behaviour. However, there are also resemblances between the photo in Source D and the text in Source B.

  1. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    stayed overnight' suggests that the Tsar did not take the events of and surrounding 'Bloody Sunday' as seriously as he should have. However, it is difficult to know whether these thoughts are true as the source is only an extract from the diary; possibly a longer section of it would

  2. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    These claims also state that the soldiers were not fired upon, and in fact no British soldier was hit by any bullet, nor were any bullets recovered after the fact. In the rage that followed, the British embassy in Merrion Square in Dublin was burned by an irate crowd.

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    Bogside', which took place the Bogside area of Derry in August 1969. The mural shows a young boy with a gas mask, which he used to protect himself from CS gas that the RUC used. He is also holding a petrol bomb, a common weapon used by residents to deter the police and army from the area.

  2. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    Source B is taken from Simon Winchester's report for the Guardian. This can seem rather transparent in places, but it has to be realised that this is a respectable newspaper and would want to retain credibility by appearing to be fair in its evidence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work