• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

Extracts from this document...


Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front? When war was declared in August 1914, it was expected by both sides to be a short war, over by Christmas. However, this was not the case, a stalemate developed on the Western Front, and for three years the front line, established when the Germans were driven back, did not really moved much. There were four main reasons as to why a stalemate developed on the Western Front. These were: * The failure of the Schlieffen Plan * The inability of the French to follow up their victory at the Marne * The outcome of the 'Race to the Channel' * The Strength of defence over attack Through the Schlieffen Plan the Germans expected the war with France to end after 42 days. ...read more.


However, although the French won the First Battle of the Marne they did not have the manpower to force the Germans to retreat back to Germany. This was due to the French having a smaller army than that of Germany and the failure of Plan XVII (the French plan to win the war). The idea of Plan XVII was an all out attack on Germany in the east. However, the French were mown down by the German machine guns, which led to severe French casualties and a weakened French army. Joffe did, however, manage to work out what the Germans had planned to do through the Schlieffen Plan and managed to move his troops to Paris, from the eastern border. ...read more.


It became like a game of chess and ended up with both sides having trenches opposite each other, which extended from the Belgian coast in the north to Switzerland in the south. Once these trenches had been dug it became evident to both sides that in this war defence would be easier than attack. New technology, for example the machine gun, meant it was far much easier to defend your trench, by shooting anyone who tried to attack you, than it was to cross no man's land in order to attack and capture the enemy's trenches. Also, good communications ensured that supplying your own trenches was also easier than attacking the enemy's. As both sides were defending and neither army was really attacking at the Western Front, it hardly changed its position for three years. This was the stalemate on the Western Front. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. why did a stalemate devlop on the western front?

    British and French troops moved in to block them and the Germans got trapped. The British got control of more ports but once again this battle resulted in digging trenches as what started to be "The First Battle Of Ypres".

  2. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    The BEF dug in along the side of the Mons Canal awaiting the advancing Germans, who were marching through Belgium following the Schlieffen Plan. After the defeat earlier by the Germans General Charles Lanrezac, asked French to hold their position along the canal for 24 hours while French and the BEF fell back.

  1. Why The Stalemate Broke

    The Germans knew this from their reconnaissance planes. The Germans fired one million artillery shells at the British lines held by the Fifth Army - over 3000 shells fired every minute. This was shortly followed by a storm trooper attack; storm troopers were hard hitting soldiers which quickly moved on the next target.

  2. The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front were ...

    These troops would have such weapons as sub-machine guns, rifle grenades and flamethrowers. Then, basic infantry would advance to "mop up" any survivors. The attack would be co-ordinated by officers in the trenches instead of being commanded by generals far away, to avoid confusion and to enable tactics to be changed at the last minute.


    on the way stopping the British entering the war, and then take the capital of France, Paris from behind.


    His place was taken by Commander Falkenhaym who decided to try to outflank the British and French forces. When the Germans started charging west on the 12 October the British and French moved troops to stop them whenever they were close to breaking through.

  1. Why did a stalemate develop on the western front.

    (Weaponry). ? Mobilisation of the Russian front was far faster than the Germans had anticipated. 100,000 troops had to be withdrawn from Paris. They were now fighting on two fronts. ? The Battle of Marne. Combined the British and the French were able to withdraw the German army but crucially could not force the Germans to totally withdraw from France.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

    Unfortunately, by the River Marne the British and French troops were blocking their way. Because the Schlieffen Plan was botched much time was wasted and so the Germans were forced back and built trenches for a defensive war. The weapons in the First World War were far better developed for

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work