• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate develop on the western front?

Extracts from this document...


Why did a stalemate develop on the western front? The western front was a line of trenches stretching from the sea in the west to the Alps in the east. By December 1914 a stalemate had developed here meaning neither the German or French armies were taking any land or making any progress at all. There were many reasons for this. Germany invaded Belgium on the 4th of August 1914, hoping to get through quickly and easily as predicted in the plan, but the Belgians had other ideas. They resisted and were able to hold up the Germans until French and British troops had mobilized, particularly at Liege. Already the schlieffen plan was failing; it required the British to not get involved. ...read more.


Now the Germans were stuck right in the middle of what they had been trying to avoid, a war on two fronts. The rest of the German army continued marching towards Paris but were driven back 60km to the River Aisne when the French and BEF arrived on the front along with new French troops ferried in by taxi and railway systems. British field marshal Sir John French wanted to withdraw all British troops from the front to rest reoraganise, but with help from Lord Kitchener French commander in chief Joseph Joffre managed to prevent this. Germany was losing land to the allies and so trench warfare began. The first signs of a stalemate began to show by September 8th. ...read more.


Battles were fought during this race, the battle of Ypres began on October 12th and lasted just under a month resulting in the loss of over 1 million French soldiers and the destruction of the BEF. France continued to attempt to break German lines to no avail, more men died. High power artillery had caused great damage to both trenches and forces meaning the stalemate progressed, there were not enough soldiers to make a forceful attack so neither side could take land from the other, again. The stalemate lasted 4 years only finally ending in 1918. The Schlieffen Plan had completely failed along with later attempts due to inaccurate calculations and the disadvantages of new technology. There was a huge lack of soldiers following the Battle of The Marne and the Race to the Sea meaning there was little progress if any at all. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Britain And The Western Front - Sources Questions

    This source shows Haig was out of touch with the way his army lived. Question 14: How does the evidence in source M support the view that the battle of the Somme was badly planned? It is shown to have been badly planned because the men had to carry over

  2. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    Sometimes in rare cases it was agreed that both sides would not bomb each other at all, based on mutual consent. "It's the Saxon's [region in Germany] that's across the road. They're quiet fellows...so there's an understanding between us. Don't fire at us and we'll not fire at you."

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    He seems to suggest there was a high 'Dunkirk spirit' atmosphere and there is no sign of troops desperately trying to climb onto his vessel. 130 soldiers were taken aboard on that ship which suggests very few of the smaller vessels actually picked up many soldiers, but it does show

  2. Why was fighting on the Western Front such a new and terrible experience for ...

    Even though this was useful there was never any certainty about what was going on ahead or the enemy's position. One classic example of this was the Battle of the Somme- after a week-long shelling and fire of the German lines the British and French went over the top in

  1. How did life for a typical soldier serving in a trench on the western ...

    The horsemen were armed with a heavy sword and one or two pistols. Some artillery was used in the English civil war with smaller guns following the army, but the heavier guns couldn't be moved easily so were used in siege warfare.

  2. Britain And The Western Front of World War One - Sources Questions

    66lbs with them when they advanced on the German trenches; they carried all their equipment and supplies. They could barely move let alone fight and when the Germans that had hidden in the bunkers opened fire the British were massacred because they could barely move due to the inhibitions of all the equipment they were carrying.

  1. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front??

    Sniper fire was a deadly menace at all times. Both sides maintained almost constant sniper watch and the brief show of a helmet; arm or shoulder could mean death. Even going to the latrine could be a lethal process. The trenches also had a fire-step so that soldiers could fire over the top against oncoming troops.

  2. Why was their stalemate on the western front?

    Gas and tanks were used very effectively but the gap in the front line caused by them was not followed up therefore more troops took the position and they were back to square one. Haig also wasted many men, which if he did not waste, could attack all at once taking the enemy trenches easily.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work