• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

WHY DID A STALEMATE DEVELOP ON THE WESTERN FRONT

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WHY DID A STALEMATE DEVELOP ON THE WESTERN FRONT Stalemate is defined as "a standoff; a deadlock; a fight without a winner" this is exactly what happened during the second world war, there were quite a few reasons for this, in this essay I will explain all of them One of the main reasons why a stalemate developed on the western front was due to the failure of the schlieffen plan; Germany tried to defeat France quickly so that they could then defeat the Russians. This plan however failed and helped to cause a stalemate. The Germans were going to invade through Belgium in a matter of days according to the schlieffen plan, but to the Germans surprise, the Belgians provided a very tough resistance, this tired and greatly slowed down the German army. The Belgians relied on their forts to provide the most resistance, it worked the forts took a long time to be defeated; the Germans had to use their huge cannon "big bertha" to destroy them. ...read more.

Middle

The Germans thought that Paris was to far for there already tired army and Marne was closer and they could fight the French there, this was ultimately the key factor in why the schlieffen plan failed, the plan revolved around the capture of Paris, once they had control of Paris they could shut off all transport and communications, come from behind to take Alsace Lorain and take the morale of the country. Another reason why a stalemate developed on the western front was down to the technology each side had. Both sides had the new invention of the machine gun and this meant that it was very difficult to advance, when a machine gunner could fire up to 600 bullets a minute. Take the battle of the Somme for example, marshal haig thought that a continuous bombardment on the Germans would come to an advance for the British and French armies, however most of the bombardment failed to destroy the Germans concrete bunkers and barbed wire, and with the Germans being at a higher point this meant that they were defensively stronger. ...read more.

Conclusion

only open flank remaining which was open for manoeuvre, each side was constantly striving to outmanoeuvre the other .Once the trench lines had reached the coast, the Allies who were defending against the German attacks, their focus switched to the Swiss border, which was 400 miles in length. Before this happened the channel was deemed to be a key strategic priority and at the end both sides had possession of different channel ports. Deemed somewhat of a draw at the end of November, trench warfare set in for the next four years with the occasional allies trying to puncture the enemy lines. So I conclude that there were a fair amount of reasons that contributed to the stalemate developing on the western front but I feel as if the failure of the schlieffen plan contributed the most as it started it all off, if the schlieffen plan had not gone ahead then Britain would not got involved and there wouldn't be devastating and somewhat pointless battles like the Somme. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. why did a stalemate devlop on the western front?

    It was quick and easy to dig the trenches in France as the land was very flat and was very soft and chalky so trenches could have been dug in a matter of hours. Race to the sea The next battle that took place was the "race to the sea"

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front during World War One?

    Both sides started to dig themselves in, making defensive positions by building trenches; these in turn formed the stale mate. The last reason the French were unable to defeat the Germans completely was that both sides of the war did not have a definite plan or strategy, the Schlieffen plan

  1. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    The Belgium's knew that Germany was twice their size but they put up a resistance from there frontier forts which was bombed by Germans. Belgium had hide themselves in underground tunnels were they waited for the German but the Germans had bomb these tunnels killing many Belgium soldiers.

  2. The Western Front

    After some initial uncertainty, Marshal Joffre realised what the German strategy was and ordered the French 1st and 2nd Armies to hold the Germans around Verdun and Nancy. Meanwhile, he formed two new armies, the 6th and 9th, in preparation for a counterattack and drew back his left flank to entice the Germans further south.

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    After saying that the men, artillery and barbed wire were so well prepared, and then giving a bad report after the first day, Haig would have greatly lost respect and trust - forcing him to lie to prevent this. Haig's report in this source contradicts what is generally accepted as

  2. History Sourcework- Field Marshal Haig Final

    phases of the First World War its military destiny was in the hands of Douglas Haig" is an unfair and one sided view of military performance throughout the war, and is one that has only come out from the critical side of Haig, not considering his strengths.

  1. Why was there a stalemate at the western front?

    thrust into a situation that overwhelmed them and after all they were only human. Machine guns, the staple weapon for any modern army, had been surprisingly dismissed by both the French and the British - classed by them as unlikely to have any effect.

  2. Was there much change in the fighting methods employed by the British Army on ...

    Only 500, 000 rounds were there to support the offensive at Loos, which is only one round in 16 minutes for heavy guns and one round in 10 minutes for field guns each day. Haig was then forced to resort to untried gas weapons, and even when shells were available

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work