• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate develop on the western front?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did a stalemate develop on the western front? During the First World War, a stalemate occurred between Germany and its rivals Britain and France. This meant that neither army was in a position to win or lose the war. This stalemate was caused mainly by the change from rapid invasions and attacking with bayonets and rifles to static trench warfare which lead to the intervention of various new weapons, modern war machines. The failure of the Schlieffen plan had led to the stalemate. The plan was intended to quickly invade France through the neutral Belgium. This violation was not accepted by Great Britain who entered the war on the French side to defend Belgium. As a consequence, the war became static in Belgium as both sides switched to trench warfare. ...read more.

Middle

On the western front, the opposing armies had different versions of these types of rifles. This meant that trenches were built on each side to avoid the crossfire. The land in between the trenches was called No-Mans Land. The Machine Gun was also used on the western front. Machine guns could, in theory, fire up to 400-600 calibre rounds every minute meaning it was a very powerful weapon. However, it was difficult to maintain and required at least 4-6 people to shoot from it. The disadvantage of the machine gun was that, to avoid it, trenches were dug deeper. Other weapons that were used on the western front were Heavy Artillery. These were long range, heavy field guns which would fire from heavy shells. ...read more.

Conclusion

This impacted the stalemate as it showed the war was not progressing. Barbed Wire was another war invention used on the western front. It was used by the enemy to cover the outer parts of the trenches, making it impossible to get through. This also stopped surprise attacks meaning the soldiers in the trenches could feel safer. One warfare tactic was to leave a gap in the barbed wire where the enemy would cross. This, however, was a trap and if the enemy crossed through the gap they would be in the perfect position to be killed. As a result of modern war interventions a stalemate developed at the western front which lasted for years. Both armies had similar weapons so it was impossible to gain an advantage over the opposition, which meant neither army could win or lose the war. Sophia Danielsson-Waters ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. why did a stalemate devlop on the western front?

    and this is what they did during this war the was a terrible amount of loss of life to both sides. On the morning of 23rd August, General Alexander von Kluck and his 150,000 soldiers attacked the British positions. Although the German Army suffered heavy losses from British rifle fire, Sir John French (British commander)

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front during World War One?

    The Schlieffen plan was failing miserably and the German troops morale was just as miserable but still, the German army advanced until they were just 40km from Paris.

  1. Trench Warfare between 1914-17

    Left hand blown off, left arm ripped up 12 inches. Scalp wound 6 inches, wound on side of knee (left) 5 inches.

  2. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    The main place that German was aiming for was Paris; if Paris was surrounded France would have been able to fight back but wouldn't have success. German knew that Russia could take up to 6 weeks to mobilise their army and Germany knew that they had 6 weeks to go through Belgium to get to France.

  1. Why was there a stalemate at the western front?

    "[The leader with] fewer mistakes will win." The third paragraph of the passage is perhaps the most important , and the one in which the commanders (from all sides)

  2. Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front?

    Ypres in Belgium was the recaptured by from the Germans and the other channel ports were al safely in allied hands. The race for the sea was over, Both sides 'dug in' for the winter in a line of trenches 470 kms long stretching from the north sea to the French-Swiss border.

  1. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

    The first army were called in from the extreme right flank and as a result the 'wheeling' movement of the German attack was cut shortened by at least thirty miles eastward.

  2. Why The Stalemate Broke

    This quickly led to an arms race between the two sides. A key change to the plane was the interrupter gear which allowed the pilot to have a machine gun mounted directly behind the propeller and shoot on the planes line if sight.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work