• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate form on the Western Front?

Extracts from this document...


A stalemate formed on the Western Front due to four main reasons, one being that the Schlieffen plan had failed, another reason was that the French were defeated by the Germans at the Battle of the Marne, the "race to the Channel" was another factor that resulted in the stalemate and the last reason was that defending positions was far easier than attacking. The Schlieffen Plan began to fail when Moltke, the German commander, altered the balance of the forces so that the right wing had three times as many troops as the left wing and as the right wing was smaller it advanced considerably slower than had been originally planned. There was also more resistance from the Belgian, British and French forces than had been expected this caused the right wing to slow down and allowed the British and French forces to retreat and then counter-attack. ...read more.


As the Schlieffen plan was failing miserably the German troops lost a great ammount of morale, however, the German army continued until they were only 40km away from Paris. Unfortuanately, by the River Marne the British and French troops were blocking their way. The French were unable to defeat the Germans at the Battle of the Marne as; firstly no matter how ill spirited the German army was, they were still well prepared and larger than the French army. The German army were also better equipt as they possesed far more munitions than the British and French. Joffre, the French comander-in-chief, did, however, manage to form troops on the east side of Paris, unfortuanately the troops were incerdiably tired and weak so did not provide a great ammount of service. ...read more.


During these next four years the positions of each side hardly changed and more and more trenches were built. As the French, British and German troops had basically burried themselves into defensive positions defending was far easier than attacking when in the trenches and this was another reason for the stalemate. Whilst attacking one would have to leave the safety and concealment of the trenches. When out in "no-man's-land", practicaly defensless, hundreds of opposing troops could easily slaughter attacking forces. Attacking was almost a form of passive euthenasia! Staying in a trench was a much safer option, however, severe punishments were issued to individuals who displayed cowardly symptoms. So, due to all these reasons, and in particular the last one, a strong, fortified stalemate developed on the Western Front, and seemingly nothing could break it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. why did a stalemate devlop on the western front?

    still the British had the upper hand as they were in control of the ports so were supplied with equipment and reinforcements. The French had also suffered around 1 million dead or wounded in only 10 weeks but they was still not giving up and was still trying to break

  2. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    The space between the opposing on the Western Front was between 100 and 300 yards apart. On the Eastern Front and Middle East the areas on the battlefield was too vast and the distance from the factory that sells shells, bullets, concrete and barbed wire was so great that the trench warfare in the European style was not eventuate.

  1. The Western Front

    Its outcome was indecisive, but the German fleet remained in port for the rest of the war. Early on 31 May the German fleet under Admiral Scheer entered the North Sea from the Baltic, intending to entice British battle

  2. Was there much change in the fighting methods employed by the British Army on ...

    In 1917, a fuse called 'No. 106' was developed, which was an extremely sensitive fuse that could detonate shells on immediate contact with wire or ground, therefore reducing the amount of cratering that occurred, and increasing the amount of wire that was cut. The British Army entered the war with basically no practical hand grenade or

  1. Why The Stalemate Broke

    This quickly led to an arms race between the two sides. A key change to the plane was the interrupter gear which allowed the pilot to have a machine gun mounted directly behind the propeller and shoot on the planes line if sight.

  2. cause of the stalemate

    Another reason for the stalemate was the role of the commanders none of them really knew how to attack well though there were good at defence witch was more to do with manpower than skill. Commanders Haig and Smith-Dorrien were vital help in stopping the Germans and starting the stalemate.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    Occasionally soldiers got to eat some luxurious food such as 'bung' (cheese), 'bakers' (sausage), bacon, cake and other food sent from soldiers' family. Soldiers at the front-line were given a daily ration of rum. This was given to warm them up and to help them boost their morale.

  2. Conditions in the trenches.

    However, at Guillemont it was only 50 yards (46 metres) whereas at Cambrai it was over 500 yards (460 metres). The narrowest gap was at Zonnebeke where British and German soldiers were only about seven yards apart.No Man's Land contained a considerable amount of barbed wire.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work