• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Alexander II Emancipate the Serfs in 1861?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Alexander II Emancipate the Serfs in 1861? The emancipation of the serfs by Alexander II in 1861 was the inevitable result of a rising tide of liberalism in Russia, supported by the realisation that Russia's economic needs were incompatible with the system, and driven by the fear that that without reform the state itself could be shattered by revolution. Russia's defeat in the Crimean war was also a major influencing factor as "Defeat in the Crimean war laid bare Russia's weakness, so well conceived reforms were set in train and permitted the birth of politics... Russian tsars had learned little during the century: at its end, they were still claiming to be absolute rulers."[1][1] Alexander II came into power in 1855, as the successor of Nicholas I. He started his reign in a difficult position, as the defeat of the Crimean war in 1854 cast a shadow over the beginning of his reign. The peace treaty of Paris finally drew a conclusion to the war in 1856, Russia ultimately being defeated by Britain and France, leaving the Russian state feeling weak and vulnerable. The Russian war effort had been characterised by the bravery of the soldiers, but poor military performance and incompetence in the military leadership "The Crimean war with its record of official incompetence and the heroism of the serf army... ...read more.

Middle

After extensive tours of Russia, often stopping in desolate little villages, Alexander knew what the situation was like for those swamped by poverty. He was sympathetic and could empathise with the sufferers: "The boy himself shrank from violence and was easily moved to pity by the sight of misery."[7][7] But Alexander was still prepared to do anything to appease the masses to avoid revolution. Another popular explanation as to why Alexander emancipated the serfs was that he wanted to modernise Russia "Raising the productivity of the Russian economy was one of the main motives for embarking on the emancipation of the serfs."[8][8] After the 1861 emancipation, he introduced many other reforms in the military, legal system, local governments, education system and in the way of censorship. He introduced local legal authorities, significantly relaxed censorship, abolished corporal punishment, established new education institutions and set up district assemblies in 1864. All these extra reforms put the emancipation into a seemingly liberal context. However, the reforms could also have been introduced to try and revolutionise the economic system of Russia. Russia still had no trains, and was a pre industrial agricultural country. Alexander had many dealings with other countries, and so saw how many other countries worked. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, Alexander wanted to avoid any other far sweeping changes across the country, to do with his autocratic rule or the state of the nobility - things which all would have been jeopardised by continuing the system of serfdom, as a revolution would have been inevitable. Alexander knew that the possibility of a revolution was very real and not far away without reformatory action. Liberalism within Russia was at its peak during Alexander's reign as censorship regulations had been lifted considerably. We have to remember than Alexander's predecessor, Nicholas I, had also touched upon the idea of emancipating the serfs. It was something which had been proposed for a while, so the fact that Alexander actually performed the emancipation can be seen more as a political necessity rather than a reforming zeal. Therefore, in conclusion, it was a mixture of the increasing liberalism in Russia rising to its peak, the defeat in the Crimean war, the need for economic reform and the fear of revolution which ultimately lead Alexander to emancipate the serfs. Given the evidence, it can also be concluded that despite his liberal influences, in the final analysis, it was a conservative act on his part. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is an excellent response that covers all major, possible motivations for emancipation and uses historiography really well to support the points made. It is focused and cogent throughout. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 01/12/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What Led to the Downfall of the Tsar?

    Another factor, probably more important, was that the wages of the working class had not risen since 1905, and urban workers were unable to provide for themselves and their families. Finally, the decisions Nicholas II made during the First World War in an already politically unstable situation meant a total loss of confidence in him and his regime.

  2. To what extent were economic problems the main cause of the 1905 revolution?

    In March and May the inevitable defeat of the army and navy by Japan lead to the government drastically changing the structure of the forces, this did not go down well with the army and navy and many of them mutinied.

  1. What Were The Causes of The1905 Revolution & TheConsequences of The Uprising?

    granted by his father were abolished, as he felt they were the reason for his father's death. This caused great tension amongst the peasants, liberals and revolutionaries as they felt bitter about Russia taking a step backwards into medieval times.

  2. “Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster” discuss.

    The class of Russians known as the Kulaks where virtually destroyed as a class, this was another positive political move if you were Stalin, the Kulaks were a threat to Stalin's ideas and because of this he had to get rid of this problem.

  1. What caused the 1917 Russian Revolution.

    The Soviet Party was one of the two first governments after the fall of 'Autocratic Russia'. On the 26th of February, soldiers and workers came face to face. Some troops fired on order, killing a number of workers. Other soldiers mutinied.

  2. How and why was Nicholas able to survive the 1905 revolution?

    approval". Thus meaning that the powers that the Liberals thought they had gained through the granting of a Duma were no more gained now than they were before October 1905. Another factor that influenced Nicholas's survival was the notable lack of involvement from the revolutionary groups that had formed prior to 1905 such as the SR's, Bolsheviks, and Menskeviks.

  1. Analyse how far WW1 caused the Russian Revolution.

    With lost of so many lives, the Tsar did not help himself when he went to the front lines to command the army. He was not an effective leader, and what he accomplished was merely being solely responsible for the disgrace of the army and the troubles that the war has caused.

  2. How significant a figure in the revolution of 1917 Russia was Lenin?

    He was also flexible and pragmatic and gave inspirational speeches to the people, acknowledged by Kukushkin in 1981 âLeninâs brilliant speeches inspired the workers and soldiers into a determined struggle.â He was extremely good at convincing people about his views and used all his many attributes to glue the party

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work