• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Alexander II Emancipate the Serfs in 1861?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Alexander II Emancipate the Serfs in 1861? The emancipation of the serfs by Alexander II in 1861 was the inevitable result of a rising tide of liberalism in Russia, supported by the realisation that Russia's economic needs were incompatible with the system, and driven by the fear that that without reform the state itself could be shattered by revolution. Russia's defeat in the Crimean war was also a major influencing factor as "Defeat in the Crimean war laid bare Russia's weakness, so well conceived reforms were set in train and permitted the birth of politics... Russian tsars had learned little during the century: at its end, they were still claiming to be absolute rulers."[1][1] Alexander II came into power in 1855, as the successor of Nicholas I. He started his reign in a difficult position, as the defeat of the Crimean war in 1854 cast a shadow over the beginning of his reign. The peace treaty of Paris finally drew a conclusion to the war in 1856, Russia ultimately being defeated by Britain and France, leaving the Russian state feeling weak and vulnerable. The Russian war effort had been characterised by the bravery of the soldiers, but poor military performance and incompetence in the military leadership "The Crimean war with its record of official incompetence and the heroism of the serf army... ...read more.

Middle

After extensive tours of Russia, often stopping in desolate little villages, Alexander knew what the situation was like for those swamped by poverty. He was sympathetic and could empathise with the sufferers: "The boy himself shrank from violence and was easily moved to pity by the sight of misery."[7][7] But Alexander was still prepared to do anything to appease the masses to avoid revolution. Another popular explanation as to why Alexander emancipated the serfs was that he wanted to modernise Russia "Raising the productivity of the Russian economy was one of the main motives for embarking on the emancipation of the serfs."[8][8] After the 1861 emancipation, he introduced many other reforms in the military, legal system, local governments, education system and in the way of censorship. He introduced local legal authorities, significantly relaxed censorship, abolished corporal punishment, established new education institutions and set up district assemblies in 1864. All these extra reforms put the emancipation into a seemingly liberal context. However, the reforms could also have been introduced to try and revolutionise the economic system of Russia. Russia still had no trains, and was a pre industrial agricultural country. Alexander had many dealings with other countries, and so saw how many other countries worked. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, Alexander wanted to avoid any other far sweeping changes across the country, to do with his autocratic rule or the state of the nobility - things which all would have been jeopardised by continuing the system of serfdom, as a revolution would have been inevitable. Alexander knew that the possibility of a revolution was very real and not far away without reformatory action. Liberalism within Russia was at its peak during Alexander's reign as censorship regulations had been lifted considerably. We have to remember than Alexander's predecessor, Nicholas I, had also touched upon the idea of emancipating the serfs. It was something which had been proposed for a while, so the fact that Alexander actually performed the emancipation can be seen more as a political necessity rather than a reforming zeal. Therefore, in conclusion, it was a mixture of the increasing liberalism in Russia rising to its peak, the defeat in the Crimean war, the need for economic reform and the fear of revolution which ultimately lead Alexander to emancipate the serfs. Given the evidence, it can also be concluded that despite his liberal influences, in the final analysis, it was a conservative act on his part. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is an excellent response that covers all major, possible motivations for emancipation and uses historiography really well to support the points made. It is focused and cogent throughout. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 01/12/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    Nicholas could be held responsible for this contributing factor towards his own downfall. Another reason Nicholas could be seen as being responsible for his own downfall concerned the Duma. Nicholas was forced to set up a Duma, parliament, as a result of the October Manifesto to give Russian people more rights.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    A massive picture of Stalin was hung on every station so that the Russian people would not forget what he had achieved through the Five Year Plans. Stalin was the big hero or Vozhd (the boss). In all his propaganda posters, Stalin is shown to be friendly to all peoples of the world and of Russia.

  1. Was the October revolution a popular uprising or a coup d(TM)tat?

    By looking at all the different historians of different times, you can see that there were mixed views as to whether the October revolution was a coup d'�tat or a popular uprising.

  2. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    Representatives from factories met to organise the strike action. Soviets were group of ordinary people such as peasants, workers and soldiers. Soviets were also formed in other cities. This was a great threat to the Tsar's government. The whole situation left the Tsar with two choices. Giving in or using force, with the possibility of massive bloodshed.

  1. How successful were Stalins Economic Policies?

    This level of control helped the Five Year Plans to be carried out effectively. He set targets, which were passed down through the 'hierarchy' of management so they could be carried out by everyone. The targets seemed unrealistic but in most cases they were close to achieving them - Stalin

  2. How did The Purges affect Russia?

    The wave of Terror also gave Stalin the opportunity to remove the 'old' members of the Bolshevik party who had individual beliefs and who owed nothing to Stalin, and replace them with loyal and obedient followers of whom would never dare question any of Stalin's policies.

  1. Why Was Russia Considered Backward in the Early 19th Century?

    Most other countries had a democratic system and elected in a body of people or party each with different policies. Although the monarch in Britain was born into the position they also had the elected government which had more power.

  2. Stalins Five Year Plans were a great success 1928-1941. Do you agree? Explain you ...

    As early as 1928, when the coal mines in the Donbass region fell behind target, 55 engineers were accused of sabotage which led to the famous Shakhty trial. The fear and hysteria created by the trials and accusation had an important impact.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work