• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Britain Have an Industrial Revolution Between 1750 and 1850?

Extracts from this document...


William Keith 27/11/02 Why did Britain Have an Industrial Revolution Between 1750 and 1850? The industrial revolution happened in Britain around 1850 and not finishing for a century. Britain was the first and all the other countries followed. In some countries, the industrial revolution has not happened yet; in all others, though, it is, in a way, still going on, because of the fact that technological advances are still happening. In Britain, the revolution saw changes in all aspects of industry. Not just in that factories and mass production were introduced, but in economy, trade, population, labour etc. There were even changes in agriculture relating to the other industrial changes of the time. Efficiency was also enhanced because of the large number of business enterprises situated within a limited area. This made people more competitive and, therefore, willing to push harder for better quality goods, in less time. During the revolution, there was a great change in the population. Not only in the total amount of people who lived in the country, but also in the amount of people living in the different areas. ...read more.


Abraham Darby II was the first to make iron products by casting it (pouring it into a mould), rather than hammering it into shape (wrought iron). Abraham Darby III specialised in making things out of iron that had never been attempted, for example, the first ever iron boat and the first ever iron bridge. The Darby family gave the name of Coalbrookdale to the area where they lived. These advances in metalworking were an important part of Britain's industrialization. Because of them, iron, a cheap, strong and abundant resource, could be used for things like machinery in many industries. Another key aspect of the revolution was that Britain had many individuals who were willing to risk all the money they had to create factories that could mass-produce items. These inventors and entrepreneurs set up many factories. There were also people like Richard Arkwright who invented a new type of cotton spinning machine. This replaced the old spinning-jenny type of spinning wheel, where one person would sit at it and spin cotton. ...read more.


The "new world" (i.e. the east) was becoming more and more explored and, due to more long haul trading routes being needed, better and faster boats were required, once again increasing the demand for new inventions. There are many, many more connections that can be made between the causes of the industrial revolution; however, I think that the most important cause was the fact that there was such demand for advancement. The least important cause, however, is very difficult to determine. This is because, when one goes down the scale of importance, there are multiple reasons for how important a cause is. However, I think that the least important cause is the fact that Britain was at peace. This cause did not contribute much to the revolution, nor would it have taken much away, had the country been at war. This is for the reason that, even at times of war, there is technological demand. At war, in fact, there is greater demand than ever and so, having war may have even sped up the revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    In term of jobs , from a workers perspective , we can clearly see that their lives were dramatically effected . This is since parents with children , didn't have the privilege of looking after their young since their children were often set to work themselves to help bring money

  2. Is Quarry Bank Mill a typical example of manufacture and production in a British ...

    been very welcoming and may have made them work harder to stay there. The children who stayed there were mostly girls as they were cheaper to have than boys. The house had its own schoolroom - it was mostly boys that were taught, as it was thought that girls should

  1. Explain why there was an Industrial Revolution

    However as people were in search of work they would have still worked at the deserted areas where some factories were located if they needed the work urgently as many of them did. Another reason why Britain why Britain's population growth caused the Industrial Revolution is because there were several

  2. The Causes of the Industrial Revolution 1750-1850.

    the rich not only had far more money but they also had the power as they could get rid of their workers at any time. Abraham Darby was a key figure in the production of iron. He worked out that the most expensive item in the production of iron from

  1. How far does Quarry Bank Mill demonstrate the methods of factory production introduced during ...

    This part of the mill is a perfect example of mill in the early days of the Industrial Revolution. It can be compared to Richard Arkwright's Cromford mill which was actually the first ever factory. Mills similar to Quarry Bank Mill also had only one, possibly two, water wheels that powered the whole mill.

  2. Contribution to the Industrial Revolution

    This in turn meant that the towns and cities started to swell in large numbers [urban growth]. So overall the two men, made a huge difference in the working styles and practices of many workers. In that time spinning yarn into thread, was an extremely slow process.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    of the peasants' congress, and did not necessarily represent the views of the electors on a vital point which had not been before them. 'The people,' said Lenin, 'voted for a party which no longer existed.' Reviewing the whole issue two years later Lenin found another argument which was more cogent than it appeared at first sight.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    also Sergeyev's account, says 'The Empress, the Tsar's son, and the four other children were not shot in that house.' This shows that somewhere along the line, Sergeyev has contradicted himself. The final sentence of source B says, 'a train left Ekaterinburg and it is believed that the surviving members of the royal family were in it'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work