• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did kristallnacht take place?

Extracts from this document...


Coursework 2. Why did kristallnacht take place? a) Which of these two sources would a historian studying kristallnacht find more useful? Source A is a summary of a journalist's column by another historian. The source tells us about an officer telling goebbles who then tells Hitler about a plan of mass attack, which he and the SA were going to launch against synagogues and Jewish shops. There was no doubt of Hitler's approval "Hitler squealed with delight and slapped his leg with enthusiasm". Goebbles who at the time was out of favour with Hitler was trying to win back his approval. The journalist worked with the Nazis so his article could not be reliable. Source B is a secret report from one nazi to another after the kristallnacht events. The source tells us about the devastation caused and may be warning the others of what to say and expect. This account would have been a secret and therefor he had been saying to another nazi "not to seem organised but neither were they to discourage the events." This essay states that both sources are useful, I would have thought that B was more useful because it's a secret report BUT... the source shows, A is more helpful because its by a fellow historian and although he worked for the nazis, he wrote his account in 1954, 9 years after the war, so that he could not get punished by the nazis. ...read more.


source C in addition source D makes source C accurate too by agreeing with certain information but was posted before kristallnacht's rioting had begun and could be biased towards Jews so this essay shows that source E is more effective to show the information that would agree with source C. d) How similar are the messages of these two cartoons? Source F and source G are very similar in many ways for example; both sources are about kristallnacht; both sources have a nasty looking nazi with clubs and daggers standing over dead bodies of Jews not 'true Germans'. both of the nazis are in uniform and both cartoons show thick grey coloured clouds of dust and dirt and smoke from the destruction and devastation. But there are also some differences in the two cartoons; f was drawn on November the 10th for a Russian paper, G was drawn on 30th of November and was in a British paper; source G makes a reference to German people, F produces a quote "attacking the Jews did me no good my fascist friend this is said by tsar Nicholas (a ghost) who was a Jewish hater in the past. Both of the sources make good, clear references for example: the nazis shown in both sources show that the ordinary German people had been a part of it and the people in uniforms were the nazis and ...read more.


Source E disagrees with the claim because it says "most German people had nothing to do with these riots and burnings and also brings up the SA with axes and hammers again. This was noted 'a civil servant' and the writer ahs no reason to lie. Sources F and G both disagree with the claim because the two men in the cartoons have uniforms on and are either Nazis or the SA. In Source G there is a woman bound up in chains she represents German people and how they couldn't do nothing but watch. Source H also disagrees because Goering is telling the courts that it was Goebbles that called the destruction and that Hitler did not approve of it and again the source says nothing about the German people being involved. Source I agrees in the way that Hitler didn't want to do it and didn't now about it also he says how it ruined some of his deals. It agrees in the way that Hitler says "the people responsible" so he is not saying it was his men or that it was the German people but 'the people' gives the impression that it was them. In my overall view of the evidence given in all of the sources about kristallnacht this essay has come to the conclusion that most of the German public stayed out of the way of the devastation!!! Thankyou x ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Why And How Did Evacuation Take Place?

    Source 11 shows a little from a 10 year old girl to her mother. It suggests how the host family is and she is telling her mother she doesn't like the host family. From my own knowledge I know that some host families were nice people and some were bad.

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place.

    Source B is blaming the German people for the attacks on the Jews. It was calling the attacks on Jews spontaneous. The source also tells us that the Nazis were not going to organise the attacks but if they did get started they were not to be stopped either.

  1. Why did the Night of the Long Knives take place?

    for Hitler in the 'Munich Putsch' and assisting him to gain votes in the 5th March 1933 elections. However, as a result of the death of Ernest R(hm on the 'Night of the Long Knives', the SA were stripped of their powers and duties and therefore became a far weaker sector of the Nazi party as they had no leader.

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    That this account regards the Nazis as those who ordered these events clearly contradicts Source B, from a secret Nazi report, which says that: 'such demonstrations were not to be organized by the Party'. The overall impression of this source is that the Nazis were entirely to blame for the

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    This makes it seem more reliable. However, in looking at what had happened, it seems that Goebbels 'encouraged a nationwide press campaign to help "stir" trouble'. Also, at a dinner to commemorate the Munich Putsch, Goebbels 'called for von Rath's death to be avenged'. These pieces of evidence do point towards riots conducted by Goebbels.

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    In his other hand, he is holding a baseball bat with nails sticking out. This implies that the Nazis don't only stab the Jews, but use extreme violence in torturing them. The Nazi has watches hanging from him and this could symbolises that the Nazi's have taken this from the

  1. Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    people but that the German public was "obviously horrified" by the Nazi acts and this tells us that they would have no incline to do this themselves. Source C also tells us that the Nazis carried out the violence. Source C is a well-balanced account of Kristallnacht and in my opinion is fairly reliable.

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    made to look like ordinary members of the public. It states that "the activity of the fire brigade being [was] confined to spraying water on adjoining buildings" and that there was "arrest and transportation to concentration camps"; it implies arresting people, ordering the fire brigade and transporting them requires organisation so it could not have possibly been spontaneous.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work