• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did kristallnacht take place?

Extracts from this document...


Coursework 2. Why did kristallnacht take place? a) Which of these two sources would a historian studying kristallnacht find more useful? Source A is a summary of a journalist's column by another historian. The source tells us about an officer telling goebbles who then tells Hitler about a plan of mass attack, which he and the SA were going to launch against synagogues and Jewish shops. There was no doubt of Hitler's approval "Hitler squealed with delight and slapped his leg with enthusiasm". Goebbles who at the time was out of favour with Hitler was trying to win back his approval. The journalist worked with the Nazis so his article could not be reliable. Source B is a secret report from one nazi to another after the kristallnacht events. The source tells us about the devastation caused and may be warning the others of what to say and expect. This account would have been a secret and therefor he had been saying to another nazi "not to seem organised but neither were they to discourage the events." This essay states that both sources are useful, I would have thought that B was more useful because it's a secret report BUT... the source shows, A is more helpful because its by a fellow historian and although he worked for the nazis, he wrote his account in 1954, 9 years after the war, so that he could not get punished by the nazis. ...read more.


source C in addition source D makes source C accurate too by agreeing with certain information but was posted before kristallnacht's rioting had begun and could be biased towards Jews so this essay shows that source E is more effective to show the information that would agree with source C. d) How similar are the messages of these two cartoons? Source F and source G are very similar in many ways for example; both sources are about kristallnacht; both sources have a nasty looking nazi with clubs and daggers standing over dead bodies of Jews not 'true Germans'. both of the nazis are in uniform and both cartoons show thick grey coloured clouds of dust and dirt and smoke from the destruction and devastation. But there are also some differences in the two cartoons; f was drawn on November the 10th for a Russian paper, G was drawn on 30th of November and was in a British paper; source G makes a reference to German people, F produces a quote "attacking the Jews did me no good my fascist friend this is said by tsar Nicholas (a ghost) who was a Jewish hater in the past. Both of the sources make good, clear references for example: the nazis shown in both sources show that the ordinary German people had been a part of it and the people in uniforms were the nazis and ...read more.


Source E disagrees with the claim because it says "most German people had nothing to do with these riots and burnings and also brings up the SA with axes and hammers again. This was noted 'a civil servant' and the writer ahs no reason to lie. Sources F and G both disagree with the claim because the two men in the cartoons have uniforms on and are either Nazis or the SA. In Source G there is a woman bound up in chains she represents German people and how they couldn't do nothing but watch. Source H also disagrees because Goering is telling the courts that it was Goebbles that called the destruction and that Hitler did not approve of it and again the source says nothing about the German people being involved. Source I agrees in the way that Hitler didn't want to do it and didn't now about it also he says how it ruined some of his deals. It agrees in the way that Hitler says "the people responsible" so he is not saying it was his men or that it was the German people but 'the people' gives the impression that it was them. In my overall view of the evidence given in all of the sources about kristallnacht this essay has come to the conclusion that most of the German public stayed out of the way of the devastation!!! Thankyou x ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Why did the Night of the Long Knives take place?

    The role of the SA was then very minor within the party as Hitler appointed a new leader named Victor Lutze, who he commanded to put an end 'to homosexuality, debauchery, drunkenness and high living' in the SA. Therefore, the SA were no longer a threat to Hitler as he had total control of them and over their new leader.

  2. Why And How Did Evacuation Take Place?

    Source 11 shows a little from a 10 year old girl to her mother. It suggests how the host family is and she is telling her mother she doesn't like the host family. From my own knowledge I know that some host families were nice people and some were bad.

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    anger, as a result of the cowardly Jewish murder of von Roth in Paris". One cannot use this part of the Source C as the Nazi press would be biased in favour of the Nazis because the Nazis own the Nazi press.

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    It may have been, as stated in source A, that Goebbels was out of favour with Hitler and that he was trying to win back support from his leader. Overall, source B is very useful to show how the Nazi party wanted the perception of events to seem, but on

  1. The philosophy of totalitarianism: What is it and how does it affect our understanding ...

    tends to weaken the strength of the German Reich."24 The cinema was similarly regulated and only allowed movies created or approved by Gobbels and his Ministry and Chamber of Films (MCF), established in 1933. While it was under direct public control, the MCF did not simply produce propaganda.25 Gobbels avoided

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    does not appear to have been written for any particular purpose other than to disclose the truth. (b) Source C, a personal view of the events of Kristallnacht, sets the tone of the account by making a contrast between the official Nazi beliefs of the German people's 'spontaneous wave of anger', and how the public was 'obviously horrified'.

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    They agree that the Nazi's are responsible and to blame for 'Kristallnacht'. We know this because we see in source F Tsar Nicholas II who encouraged attacks against the Jews. It shows the reader of the Russian magazine that it didn't do him any good and tells the Nazi's to watch what they are doing.

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place.

    This makes the source seem a little less reliable. The Nazi party would have had time to learn that the action had not been popular with the German people so they could have changed the story so it seems like the Nazis didn't have anything to do with Kristallnacht.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work