• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Nicholas II survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Nicholas II survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of 1917? When Father Gapon and his followers marched peacefully on the Winter Palace on 22nd January in what came to be known as Bloody Sunday due to the extreme reaction leading to the massacre of the protestors, it sparked the revolution of 1905, consisting of workers' strikes and protests in addition to terrorising the wealthy and important upper classes. As well as being a response to Bloody Sunday, the 1905 revolution was a result of pent up dissatisfaction with the autocracy in Russia and with the vast social inequality. However, in spite of the unrest within the country, the tsar managed to retain power after this revolution. In 1917, when the people revolted again, he was not so lucky, and the autocracy fell. There are many reasons why the Tsar was able to survive the 1905 revolution, not least of which was the benefit of good ministers to advise him well. Stolypin tried to have a moderating influence on the Tsar and to help him make concessions to the people which would promise to improve their lives enough that the revolution would die down. ...read more.

Middle

Stolypin also helped to further satisfy the people and to improve their lives by his series of land reforms following soon after the revolution of 1905. This apparent relaxing of the autocracy pacified the people enough for the tsar to maintain his position in 1905. By 1917, making concessions was no longer an option: the people had seen that the Duma had only a nominal influence and was nothing more than a pacifier, the Tsar having dismissed the first Duma after only 73 days, the second lasting only a short while longer, and the tsar having the ultimate decision on all matters no matter what the Duma might think. The Russian people would not settle for being bought off with promises a second time: by 1917 they would only be happy with the abdication of the Tsar. Although the turning of the Cossacks on the people caused the problem of the Bloody Sunday Massacre, the loyalty of the army to the Tsar was a key factor in his retention of power. ...read more.

Conclusion

With no armed forces to control it, the whole situation descended into disorganised anarchy in 1917. Although the October Manifesto may have saved the Tsar in 1905, his failure to fulfil the promises stipulated therein played a large part in his downfall in 1917. The emergence of the free press after 1905 granted the right to express opinions by publication meant that the Tsar was widely criticised to the public for the first time, whereas previously none of his wrong-doings had ever been made known, and he was viewed as ordained by god. Now however the Russians began to see him as fallible and to question his actions, leading to further unrest. Similarly, and perhaps most importantly, the Duma in 1917 provided a viable alternative to the autocracy which had not been present in 1905. Ironically, just as freeing the serfs had led to them wanting more and assassinating Tsar Alexander II, Nicholas' grandfather, so granting the people their Duma in 1905 in part led to the eventual downfall of the Tsar in 1917. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    Many battles were lost and more soldiers were being wounded soldiers began to give up drop their guns and run for home, when this begins to happen within an army all discipline is lost. The war had a devastating effect on Russia and its economy.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    They also help to support my views on the reliability of the sources by the strength of the connections with the other sources. d) On 2nd March 1917 Tsar Nicholas II abdicated. Use the sources and your own knowledge to explain why he did this?

  1. How secure was Nicholas II as Tsar in 1914? Nicholas II was Tsar for ...

    This meant that his position wasn't secure. Although it could be argued that because Witte died before 1914 his affects on Nicholas' position at this time was small. The Russo-Japanese war in 1904 certainly made the Tsars position volatile. The war was started by Russia itself but their military was unprepared and unable to transport supplies to soldiers.

  2. Why was Nicholas II able to survive the 1905 revolution but was forced to ...

    The 'October Manifesto' promised the following:- 1) Guaranteed freedom of speech 2) Freedom from arrest without due cause 3) An elected Duma (parliament) with power to make laws 4) Legal political parties were allowed Though the promised elections did take place, the Tsar didn't like the Duma that was created,

  1. How did the Tsar survive the 1905 Revolution?

    population back to work and away from governmental necks (despite a few assassinations), and, while perhaps not emerging unscathed, emerged nonetheless. The revolution, if that's what it truly was, was a revolt driven by discontent with living-not discontent directed squarely at the government in and of itself.

  2. Why did the Tsar Abdicate after the 1917 Revolution but not after the 1905 ...

    .In 1915 a "Progressive Bloc" was formed to tell the Tsar that a government was needed to make the war better for Russia but the Tsar just turned the idea down and got rid of the Duma. Also in 1915 the Tsar went off to the Eastern Front during the

  1. Why was the Tsarist regime able to survive the revolution of 1905?

    Trotsky wanted a constitutional monarchy where a democratic government was present, people had the right to vote and have an input into how their country was run. At that current time it was not possible because the Tsar was in full control once the liberals had backed down and accepted the October manifest.

  2. Explain how the autocracy (Tsar) managed to emerge from the events of 1905 unscathed.

    On 3rd March1905, the Tsar offered a consultative assembly to try and bring an end to the violence. The rest of 1905 continued in a similar way. Defeats in Japan caused further outrage in Russia, which caused the Tsar to make further concessions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work