• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Nicholas II survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Nicholas II survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of 1917? When Father Gapon and his followers marched peacefully on the Winter Palace on 22nd January in what came to be known as Bloody Sunday due to the extreme reaction leading to the massacre of the protestors, it sparked the revolution of 1905, consisting of workers' strikes and protests in addition to terrorising the wealthy and important upper classes. As well as being a response to Bloody Sunday, the 1905 revolution was a result of pent up dissatisfaction with the autocracy in Russia and with the vast social inequality. However, in spite of the unrest within the country, the tsar managed to retain power after this revolution. In 1917, when the people revolted again, he was not so lucky, and the autocracy fell. There are many reasons why the Tsar was able to survive the 1905 revolution, not least of which was the benefit of good ministers to advise him well. Stolypin tried to have a moderating influence on the Tsar and to help him make concessions to the people which would promise to improve their lives enough that the revolution would die down. ...read more.

Middle

Stolypin also helped to further satisfy the people and to improve their lives by his series of land reforms following soon after the revolution of 1905. This apparent relaxing of the autocracy pacified the people enough for the tsar to maintain his position in 1905. By 1917, making concessions was no longer an option: the people had seen that the Duma had only a nominal influence and was nothing more than a pacifier, the Tsar having dismissed the first Duma after only 73 days, the second lasting only a short while longer, and the tsar having the ultimate decision on all matters no matter what the Duma might think. The Russian people would not settle for being bought off with promises a second time: by 1917 they would only be happy with the abdication of the Tsar. Although the turning of the Cossacks on the people caused the problem of the Bloody Sunday Massacre, the loyalty of the army to the Tsar was a key factor in his retention of power. ...read more.

Conclusion

With no armed forces to control it, the whole situation descended into disorganised anarchy in 1917. Although the October Manifesto may have saved the Tsar in 1905, his failure to fulfil the promises stipulated therein played a large part in his downfall in 1917. The emergence of the free press after 1905 granted the right to express opinions by publication meant that the Tsar was widely criticised to the public for the first time, whereas previously none of his wrong-doings had ever been made known, and he was viewed as ordained by god. Now however the Russians began to see him as fallible and to question his actions, leading to further unrest. Similarly, and perhaps most importantly, the Duma in 1917 provided a viable alternative to the autocracy which had not been present in 1905. Ironically, just as freeing the serfs had led to them wanting more and assassinating Tsar Alexander II, Nicholas' grandfather, so granting the people their Duma in 1905 in part led to the eventual downfall of the Tsar in 1917. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    Many battles were lost and more soldiers were being wounded soldiers began to give up drop their guns and run for home, when this begins to happen within an army all discipline is lost. The war had a devastating effect on Russia and its economy.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    but as soon as his army regained control he ignored the Duma. Although, Nicholas was able to survive as Tsar on a shoestring, the final blow came when the February revolution stirred. I have several sources telling the story of events, which led up to Nicholas abdicating the throne of Russia.

  1. How and why did the tsar nicholas II survive the 1905 revolution?

    His main focus was to rid of the old strip system in hopes of modernising Russia.

  2. How secure was Nicholas II as Tsar in 1914? Nicholas II was Tsar for ...

    However in many respects Witte's reforms hindered Nicholas' security. This is because industrialisation created the working class, which moved to the cities. These people were deeply unhappy due to their poor, cramp, and dirty living conditions. It was these people who rose against him in the 1905 revolution and obviously did not support him.

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    winter palace in order to present a petition to reform their living conditions. The peasants and working class of Russia were outraged at their living status and demanded improvement such as the right to have trade unions and an end to war with Japan.

  2. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    end the war in order to concentrate on his own problems in Russia. Witte negotiated the Treaty of Portsmouth in August 1905: Russia did not have to pay any reparations to Japan and very little land was lost to Japan.

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917 revolution?

    The Tsar was generally unliked by his government and armed forces as well as Russia's people. The October manifesto was a list of rights put forward by the protestors of 1905 that the Tsar had to sign in order to stop the revelution.

  2. "Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March ...

    Workers wanted more political power, they did not want to continue living and working under poor conditions, earn low pays and work for long hours. The many minorities in Russia wanted more autonomy from the autocracy. The Socialist Revolutionaries wanted a socialist state by creating a peasant revolution and the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work