• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did opposition to British rule in India grow in the years 1919 1933?

Extracts from this document...


In 1919 as the war ended expectations of the Indians began to be crushed by the attitude of the British and this created more disappointment amongst Indians and many now began to oppose the British rule of India and felt it was time for the British to leave India and began demanding for Home Rule. Unrest amongst Indians increased and made it harder for the British to control India so they decided to investigate and report on the situation of India and later the passed the report to the Rowlatt Acts which extended the Defence of India Act into peacetime. The Rowlatt Acts were a serious mistake and a major turning point in the movement for Home Rule. They proved that the promises made by the Montagu Declaration and the Government of India Act meant nothing. The Acts suggested that the British were not going to give away control of India. This changed the way the campaigns for Home Rule were carried out and led to the emergence of Gandhi who influenced Congress to take a more non violent civil disobedience and made a stand against the British authorities. ...read more.


Congress immediately started a campaign against the new laws and they began to gain major support and started multiple peaceful protests against the British. The Government of India Act was criticised for only giving 2.8 percent of the Indians could vote. The Provincial Assemblies soon found out that they did not have enough money to perform their duties. Congress did not accept this Act and this was a major problem because Congress had now become a national movement and the British in future needed permission of Congress if they decided to make any radical changes to the way India governs itself. Gandhi emerged at this time and began to lead peaceful protests. Congress demanded Home rule and Swaraj (Self control and Self rule). He gathered support and became very popular as he began to involve the lower caste and poorly educated Indians into the Congress Movement for the first time. Gandhi organised a massive non co-operation campaign as Congress members started to boycott British goods and adopted a policy of swadeshi which meant buying Indian goods and encourage Indians to make their own. ...read more.


The Round Table Conference discussed the possible ways in which India could be granted Independence but no further steps were taken. Many Indians were disappointed when Gandhi returned with no Independence, the protest had been called off and Jinnah began to lose faith in Congress. By this stage Home rule was not what the Indians wanted; they began to demand for full Independence. As the third Round Table Conference again resulted in no further steps the opposition grew with frustration and began to get bigger. I think that the opposition in India grew because the demands of Indians increased rapidly but the British were always one step behind and did not offer more to the Indians at the right time therefore the opposition increasingly got frustrated with the British. The British also did not make themselves look good because of the Amritsar Massacre and arresting 60,000 Congress members. The Rowlatt Acts also increased anger amongst Indians along with the growing concerns of the recession in the early 1920's. ?? ?? ?? ?? Why did opposition to British rule in India grow in the years 1919 - 1933? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Culture Wars: Forster's A Passage To India

    Stereotypes are also shared among Indian nationalities as Forster makes clear in his explanation of the Hindus by the Moslem Aziz: "Slack Hindus -- they have no idea of society; I know them very well because of a doctor at the hospital.

  2. Public health in Britain during the hundred years from 1850 to 1950

    the 19th century, work that along with that of Benjamin Seebohm Rowntree influenced government intervention against poverty in the early 20th century. Booth investigated poverty in London working with a team of investigators. This research, which looked at incidences of poor people in the East End of London, showed that 35% were living in abject poverty.

  1. History: India Independence Coursework

    Another weakness of source C is that, it doesn't provide a purpose for why Britain needed to leave and give India her independence, whereas both sources A and B do. In conclusion, having reviewed the arguments, I think that source C combines what was said in sources A and B

  2. Describe British rule in India at the end of the First World War.

    The options brought forward to please the Indians were reforms, which were brought about by the Secretary of State for India and the Viceroy (which also increased his power). The Morley-Minto Reforms were one of the many reforms designed to satisfy the Indians.

  1. Titus Salt and Saltaire.

    This is where Titus' family was laid to rest. This suggests that Titus had a great love towards the church and the beliefs behind it. The actual name of Saltaire suggests that Titus really did believe in himself. And also that he was quite bigheaded. Usually people only get named after things when they are dead but Titus was still alive when he gave the village that name.

  2. Sharpeville - massacre or self defence

    Although being a bishop might mean that he would always tell the truth, but it is impossible to tell whether he did or not. he was a supporter of the ANC and the title - "the sharpeville massacre" suggest that he's in favour for blacks.

  1. How and why has the use of the buildings that house the Quay Arts ...

    and leaving Whitbread's with the insurance money, as well as the enablement to sell off the land. Overall, I feel my conclusion is drawn to hold technological advancements, and hence the developments made in transport as the major basis for the decline.

  2. Why did a campaign for womens suffrage develop in the years after 1870?

    Emmeline Pankhurst founded "The Women's Social and Political Union" in 1903 with the help of her three daughters. Their motto was 'Deeds not words' and until the First World War WSPU members campaigned "energetically and sometimes violently" for women's suffrage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work