Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Samantha Bennett Modern World History Coursework Assignment 1 b) Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front? The Schlieffen plan did not, it failed to work for various reasons, some of these being The Russian offensive, German advance east of Paris, the German exhaustion, Joffres leadership, British involvement, Belgium resistance. In August Germany invaded Belgium and Britain stood by its guarantee of Belgium's neutrality and declared war on Germany, within a week, 120,000 troops of the British Expeditionary Force had been secretly shipped to France, this held the Germans up briefly and the British the retreated to France to help the French. The Germans marched in to France but they were forced, because of their lack of soldiers, to sweep east of Paris and they failed to encircle Paris. ...read more.

Middle

The German casualty figures were so high they were never published. The General Joffre inspired the French armies to resist Germany and he rushed reserve troops to the front from Paris using any means possible. The battle of Marne exhausted Germans and threw then back from the Marne River and began to dig trenches to defend then selves. The Germans had failed to capture Paris and they had been stopped at the Battle of Marne. Both sides now rushed troops north to capture the channel ports in the 'race to the sea' the germans wanted to capture the ports as they felt they would be good U-boat bases. The Germans took Ostend and then captured Antwerp, despite the reinforcements of British marines. ...read more.

Conclusion

wire and both warned the offending side of a impending attack there were waves of attacking infantry being mown down by the defending machine gunners but neither sides artillery or infantry could breach the enemies front line to let the Calvary through. Even the development of new tanks, gas and aircrafts could not break the stalemate and despite heavy losses neither side gained much ground. The governments were using means of propaganda as a way to build morale throughout the troops, conditions were terrible and soldiers discipline was extremely harsh as deserters could be shot. The only way it seemed that stalemate could be broken was if the Schlieffen plan had succeed, one of the German offences broke through the front line or if one or both sides were prepared to make peace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. World War 1 - Breaking of the Stalemate

    To begin the attack, small groups of well trained soldiers were sent. They moved stealthily between shell holes, to avoid machine gun fire and retain the element of surprise. It was a complete success, the allied line was broken in many places, and the rest of the German army poured through the holes.

  2. Trench Diary Assignment.

    I was put into the front line alongside Tom. We then set off to the front line. The second we entered the back of the trenches we were greeted by the loud sounds of shells. The trenches were about five foot deep, so that you could walk in safety from rifle-fire.

  1. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front during World War One?

    their defensive positions in their trenches, defending positions was far easier than attacking and this was another addition to the reason of the stalemate.

  2. Why stalemate broke down on the Western Front World War One

    I believe that the order of importance is: the German offensive, as it changed the way war was fought - giving opportunity for an advance on either side; this advance is the opposite of stalemate. Then the American entry to war as broke the morale of the German troops gravely

  1. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    The German Supreme Moltke had to pull out 100,000 troops from the army advance from Paris because they found out that Russia had mobilise quicker than supposed to and had already invaded Germany. This was proved that the British and French were needed.

  2. Why The Stalemate Broke

    The first country to use gas was Germany; this was mainly down the fact that Germany was a main manufacturer of chemicals. It accounted for more than 80% of the world's dye and chemical industry. This was foul play by the German as the use of gas had been banned in the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.

  1. haig coursework

    Source G is useful in understanding the controversy surrounding the tactics Haig used at the battle of the Somme because it shows that many of the troops believed in their commander. This is shown by '...which had complete confidence in the leadership of their commander.'

  2. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    The Americans had hesitated about siding with autocratic Russian government but the overthrow of the Tsar in the March Revolution removed this obstacle. The Germans launched the German March Spring Offensive because they knew that they could not withstand an allied offensive like Passchendaele a second time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work