• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin employ a policy of terror in ruling USSR 1928-1939?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin employ a policy of terror in ruling USSR 1928-1939? There were several reasons why Stalin used terror whilst in power in the USSR from 1928-1939. He used terror in things such as to eliminate his opposition from within and in the party through purges, it was used in certain ways through collectivisation, he used it during the five year plans. But why did he have to use terror to achieve success? Making sure Stalin's five year plans worked was an important factor as to why terror was used. Stalin wanted success in industrialisising the USSR desperately. He needed the USSR to be more independent in industry, as he knew that if the USSR wasnt independent enough., when a war came about, the USSR would be very short on resources and therefore stuck. The fact that the USSR was behind the majority of europe in terms of development called for terror to make people work harder in mines, factories etc. A more advanced industry would help the USSR gain better weapons should another war come about. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, to do this he intimidated the workers by show trials, which showed the public what happens if they put a foot wrong or dont pull their weight in work. This encouraged them to keep working hard. Stalin had collectivisation plans which involved the of the peasants handing over what they had- animals, tools, buildings, land etc. The amount of peasants who did well for themselves felt hard done by this, and Stalin used terror to make sure they handed their goods over, and made sure they didnt think about resisting handing over either. This made sure the system worked smoothly because Stalin knew that it was a huge operation and would only work if people were forced to go along with it. Stalin also used terror just because of the plain fact that he wanted his country to be rich and prosperous quickly. Because the Bolsheviks believed in communism, this means no matter how hard you work, you can be as wealthy as anyone else. Stalin wanted people to know that slacking is not acceptable and they cannot get away with it. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin was bought up harshly when he was a child, within the space of 11 years he was arrested and exiled to Siberia 8 times, he carried out bank robberies, even the prisoners gave him his name- man of steel. This meant Stalin was well known as a "hard" man, which means that he had certain flaws which made him inflict terror possibly because he wanted people to feel his pain, or he wasnt aware of the evil in what he was doing- after all, we know that Stalin was treated harshly as a boy, so terror was just a normal thing to him, even if it was on a smaller scale. In conclusion, Stalin used terror for a number of important factors which link to each other. However, the most important factors were the 5 year plans, combined with Stalins "hardman" personality. This is because Stalin used terror to make his ideas work as he didnt know any other way. He knew that he wasn't a very charismatic politician, and he also knew that he couldnt think up any other way to make his ideas work,although he used methods such as awards for so he used his hardman persoanality and used thuggish tactics to get what he was hoping to achieve. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    This could be shown from World War Two. As Hitler and his Nazi party hated the idea of communism, it was one of his plans to invade Russia. When they did attempt this, the Russian army, quite successfully, fought them off.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    The source claims that had Stalin not used terror, then people would have noticed what a bad leader he was. The sources are both different in the way they examine Stalin, source L shows Stalin to be a good politician regardless of his evil side.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    In this essay I will analyse the two sources by Khrushchev and reflect on the statements he made about Stalin and discuss whether Khrushchev's assessment of Stalin are accurate. In Source G Stalin is described as a person that was "convinced that the use of terror and execution was necessary for the survival of the Soviet Union".

  2. Consider this judgement on the consequences of Stalin's leadership of the Soviet Union 1928 ...

    He believed this would require the 'subservience of the peasantry to industrialisation' - he would go to any lengths to accomplish this. This mammoth industrial revolution began in 1928 with the first 5-Year Plan, focussing on the advancement of heavy industries such as iron, steel and coal production.

  1. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    becoming the new leader of Russia when he dies hence Khrushchev didn�t lose the proposal Stalin made to him. Instantly this source spots that Khrushchev was deliberately attacking Stalin because he said: ��Stalin was convinced that the use of terror and executions was necessary for the defence of Socialism and

  2. Between 1928 and 1941 Stalin had a huge effect on Russia.

    The Tsar survived and crushed the revolution by firstly arresting and then exiling revolutionist leaders, so revolutionists had far fewer leaders to march them, and secondly by using the army to fight street fighters (as it was loyal to the Tsar)

  1. How and with what results to 1939 did Stalin succeed in asserting his personal ...

    Similarly, Tomsky was sacked as head of trade unions and, in 1930, he and Rykov (both supporters of the NEP) were removed from the Politburo. As Fitzpatrick states, "Like previous oppositions to Stalin the Right was defeated by the Party machine which Stalin controlled".

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    This is strange in a way. In Stalin's time people had to be careful of what they said or they may have faced death. I could not imagine anyone being relaxed with a man like this especially while engaged in conversation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work