• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain's major cities in the early years of the Second World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain's major cities in the early years of the Second World War? The British Government decided to evacuate because they didn't want to endanger the lives of children who were at risk from bombing. They were taken from busy cities and towns such as London and Birmingham, and moved to quieter countryside retreats. They were moved from the larger cities and towns because they were more likely to be attacked in them because of the industries e.g. factories and docks. Evacuation plans had been in preparation well before the outbreak of war. Mass evacuation took place on August 31st 1939, where 827,000 children and 535,000 pregnant mothers were evacuated from the cities and towns to the country. ...read more.

Middle

Another reason for evacuating children was to keep up British Morale. This meant that if the children were happy, and the parents knew they were safe, the country might have been stronger in the face of battle. Because Britain had already suffered air attacks from zeppelins in the First World War in Scarborough, and other coastal cities and towns, air attacks were expected again this time. During the first few months of the war, very little happened on the Home Front. The expected immediate widespread bombing of British cities and industrial areas never took place. This period became known as the 'phoney war'. It was during this time that many of the evacuees started to drift back home, only to be evacuated once against a few months later. ...read more.

Conclusion

Local authorities in reception areas however, had compulsory powers to allocate evacuees to billets. Because Britain didn't know that the first year or so of the Second World War was going to be "phoney", Blitzkrieg (Lightning War) was hugely overestimated. Britain wasn't expecting quick attacks using bombers (Luftwaffe) and paratroopers. Blitzkrieg was very significant to Germany's early triumph because it made them get the head start against Britain by having lots of quick and easy successes, such as capturing southern cities and towns. During this time, British morale would probably be deteriorating, because they might of thought that their children were in danger, but it was Churchill who kept morale up by stating that the evacuation of Dunkirk was a success and by sporting " bulldog spirit". Bradley Reynolds 11P1 09/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    These centre around the fact that the source is an extract from a novel. This means that the purpose of the text is not to inform the reader about history, but to entertain the reader. This means that, even though Nina Bawden has obviously researched evacuation, and possibly used her

  2. Discuss the impact of the Second World War on Britain.

    This led to greater freedom of sexual relationships. Women were less prepared to marry and there was an important increase in the divorce rate because of the war. During the war, the State grew in size and gave itself more power for example for conscription, for censorship or for the allocation of labour.

  1. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    Therefore they didn't like the idea of Totalitarianism which was how Hitler ruled Germany, so they became rivals. This meant that both Britain and USA were against Hitler, and therefore America supported Britain in WW2. As well as America Italy also took part in giving there view on Dunkirk but

  2. Explain the importance of the battle of Britain as a turning point of the ...

    In this way the fall of France was more important than the Battle of Britain because it left Britain on a lone crusade against the German war machine, however some minor advantages of the Fall of France was that on 18th June Charles De Gaulle (The leader of Free France)

  1. Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain(TM)s major cities in ...

    In the lead up to World War Two, European governments had been terrified of bombing. The German Air force, Luftwaffe, took a role in the Spanish civil war where they carried out mass bombings on the Basque town of Guernica on April 26th 1937.

  2. World war 1

    Similarly Source H applauds Haig and calls him 'the main architect of the Allied victory'. This source is written by a British general in 1973, which fought in both wars. The general says that 'Germany's spirit of resistance was broken, mainly by the courage and resolution of Haig's armies', he congratulates him.

  1. Evacuation Of British School Children In World War 2.

    However, the impression is given that the man thought his child would go to a very remote area where the people could have been starving. He also says that if he got killed during the war he would rather have his child at home with him where there are people nearby that could look after him.

  2. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    Overall source B16 is neither valid towards the interpretation of Dunkirk nor reliable. In conclusion my final opinion is that the Battle of Dunkirk was a defeat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work