• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the British plan for the first day of the battle of the Somme fail?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the British plan for the first day of the battle of the Somme fail? At the end of 1915 the British and French governments held a conference at Chantilly. They decided that they should have a combined attack against the German front line situated at the Somme, where the British and French forces met. This was mostly to the people back in each home country that the British and French were working together in the war, as they had mostly been putting in individual efforts. The attack was planned to take place in August 1916 but because the French were unable to join because of a major attack at Verdunne, which the British hoped to relive by attacking the Somme and drawing away German troops. The date was moved to the 1st of July so the British armed forces could be ready without the help of the French. The bombardment of the German trenches had started seven days previous to this date of attack Sir Henry Rawlinson devised the plan and Field Marshall Douglas Haig oversaw the carry out of the plan. The plan was to bombard the German trenches with eighteen miles of artillery shelling for seven days and seven nights. ...read more.


The artillery firing was also of low standard, most were obsolete and had to be used to make up the numbers and so this took down the accuracy of the shelling. Because the shelling was supposed to destroy all barbed wire obstructing the German trenches it was a surprise to the walking British troops that the shells, due to their poor quality had only made gaps in the wire. This caused the funneling effect of the British army on their walk to the German trenches. The reason for only making gaps in the wire is because the wrong types of shells were used. The shells were packed with shrapnel and their force was aimed up when another type of shell with a downward explosion should have been used. The effect of this failure meant that the British troops had to funnel towards the gaps in the barbed wire and the Germans were still alive in their bunkers and so could rush to their parapet (The lip of the German trench) And they could fire upon the British troops. Due to the lack of faith Rawlinson had in the inexperienced troops. ...read more.


If the British had won the race to the parapet they could have shot the Germans as they came out of their bunkers and won the battle. They didn't and so lost the first day. One regiment ran and disobeyed orders these were the Royal Ulster regiment. They made it through to the second trenches where they were shelled by their own artillery. I think the most important reason for the failure of the bombardment was the fact the Germans were hidden underground and this is because them surviving was the reason so many British soldiers died and so failed the plan to take the trenches safely and with little or no casualties. This failure was not really to blame on the British. It was a fact unknown to them that the Germans had bunkers but I think that if they had a little more faith in their men and not their plan, then they would have taken precautions, such as letting the men run. I the men had of run they could have killed all German troops hiding anyway and so them walking was the most important reason for them loosing the race to the parapet and ultimately the battle on the first day. Ben Squire 11.3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    John Raws was quite fearful of what he was writing would get out to his officers as the higher ranks control every situation and would not allow leak of information getting out to the people if it was not positive.

  2. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    There are loads of dugouts at the support trenches. I settled down in my dugout, which was specie, and I placed all of my equipment down. There were showers and many beds and of course I had to lay down my blanket.

  1. The Battle of Verdun.

    Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your own studies. Sources A to K neither prove that the strategy of attrition employed by the Germans at Verdun was an error of judgement nor do they disprove it. The Attack started excellently, huge gains were made in the first

  2. History Sourcework- Field Marshal Haig Final

    However, more recent studies from historians like Trevor Wilson and Gary Sheffield have begun to disprove this view, suggesting he was extremely tactical, but so much that he gave himself unreasonable objectives. Source D from Punch is similar. The General (Haig)

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    Another possible intention of the source could be that it is an excerpt from Haig's diary. If the diary were solely intended for his exclusive use, then his entries would be completely accurate, reliable and true. Therefore showing that he didn't care about the lives of his men, as if

  2. Why did British fail to achieve their objectives in the battle of the somme?

    Between July and august the attack continued the same way and the same result. Some of the land was gained. But the Germans retreated to good defensive positions in the woods so it made it harder for the British to attack and shoot them and there were on a hill and had trees defend ring them.

  1. The Battle of The Somme:

    The attack had proved to be a failure, but with the French still under strenuous pressure at Verdun there was no chance in calling it off. After the British barrage the Germans were alerted of their enemy's trek forward by the detonation of 17 mines, one of which was set

  2. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    The 250,000 men who went forward into a dense fog were expected to advance no less than 10 miles up the valley, clearing the enemy from the forest of the Argonne and bursting two of the three German defences lines-bearing the Wagnerian names of Giselher, Herimhilde and Freya.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work