• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

why did the communist bloc collapse

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Communist bloc collapse? There are many different reasons which helped contribute to the collapsing of the Communist Bloc. Some of these were the on goings in Poland, and Eastern Europe and Gorbachev's reform policies. Gorbachev's reformist policies in the Soviet Union simply encouraged opposition movements to the Communist regimes in the Soviet bloc countries. Demonstrations became more frequent. Governments were forced to accept measures, recommended, moreover, by Gorbachev, towards liberalisation. Gorbachev also informed the communist bloc that he will not use the red army to prop up their regimes. The Sinatra Doctrine was Gorbachev's policy of allowing neighbouring Warsaw Pact nations to determine their own internal affairs, so basically the eastern countries could do things their own way. ...read more.

Middle

After the events in Poland, the Eastern countries followed there lead and tried to make changes of their own. In Hungary, demonstrations against the regime increased during 1987 and 1988. The Opposition became organised, and reformers entered the Government in June 1988. On 18 October 1989, the Stalinist Constitution was abandoned, and Hungary adopted political pluralism. Earlier that year, in May, the 'Iron Curtain', which separated Hungary from Austria, had been dismantled, which enabled many East Germans to flee to the West. Also in the German Democratic Republic, opposition to the Stalinist regime grew. Huge demonstrations took place, and increasing numbers of East Germans fled the country. The Government would not consider any kind of reform, counting on the intervention of Soviet troops stationed in the GDR. ...read more.

Conclusion

On overall, it is clear that all factors contribute to the end of the Communist Bloc but I do however think we can look at which were the key factors. The most important for me was the fact that Gorbachev was willing to let things unfold, and that he was not going to intervene with Eastern Europe. His decision to do this enabled the people to rebel against the governments in place. Had he decided to get involved and support the eastern governments, then the rebellions may not have succeeded. Although he allowed it to happen, the fact that the people were able to organise and co ordinate such uprisings, was extremely crucial, and had they not been organised, the eastern governments in say Poland or Germany could have knocked them back, but the people and the uprisings were strategically planned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1945-1991 essays

  1. Notes on the Solidarity movement in Poland.

    Walesa was aware of how dangerous it was, but he could not do anything to stop the actions of the dividing factions. * The Soviet Union thought that the situation in Poland had gone to far and that it

  2. How Far Was Gorbachev Responsible For The End Of Soviet Union?

    on the issue of Eastern Europe breaking away. Also there is the case of Gorbachev and his anti-alcohol campaign that wasted millions of rubbles the USSR needed, also the example of the continuing arms supplies that were at the USSR's expense.

  1. the collapse of the war

    Arguments came up such as the details of the boundaries between the zones in Berlin and communism coming to power in the countries of Eastern Europe. Also huge disagreements came about the amount of reparations Soviet Union should receive from Germany.

  2. The Duvalier regime compared to other dictatorships on Haiti during the middle of the ...

    masses, and he pulled through a heap of reforms known as the Black Revolution. Ever since 1804 there's been clashes between the black and the mulatto population, and the mulattoes were generally better of economically than the blacks. Estim� wanted to change this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work