• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the discoveries of the Renaissance make little practical difference to medical treatment in the period c1500-c1700?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the discoveries of the Renaissance make little practical difference to medical treatment in the period c1500-c1700? (12 marks - 18 minutes) The discoveries of the Renaissance did not make a significant contribution to the improvement of medical treatment for many reasons. The first of these reasons is that the discoveries made during these times were primarily about anatomy - not treatment. Vesalius dissected bodies in order to prove that many of the works that Galen - the renowned ancient Greek who had formed the basis for modern medical teachings - had produced, were in fact wrong. This included the discovery that the jaw is comprised of one single bone - not the two that Galen had said. ...read more.

Middle

These would late form key elements in helping to identify effective drugs and cures, but during the Renaissance they were met with opposition and took over 40 years before they became accepted ideas in medical schools. Many people were also afraid to cure themselves - illnesses were created by God to punish you or test your loyalty. Attempting to get rid of these would be going against God, at a time when the Church wielded significant power and had the backing of the crown. If at all, they preferred to trust in 'wise women' or 'curies' of their villages, who themselves were instantly suspicious of using new methods over tried-and-trusted ones. ...read more.

Conclusion

Training methods continued to be based on the work of Galen, and by extension, Hippocrates. These were very old methods dating from Ancient Greece, which relied on 'The Theory of the Four Humours'. Galen stated that an illness should be treated with an opposite humour (E.G. cold drinks when suffering from sunstroke). While these did occasionally reduce the effects of an illness, they were more likely to not work at all - yet medical students continued to be taught these inefficient and outdated methods in universities. In conclusion, while the Renaissance did greatly improve our ability to understand the anatomy and buildup of the human body, it did little to change treatment. This was primarily due to the power of the church and the reduced demand for change from the people. ?? ?? ?? ?? History - Medicine and treatment through the ages ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The strength of this answer is that it has a sharp focus on the period and does give quite a range of accurate and correct reasons why treatments were not improved. It could be improved with more explanation at the end of each paragraph and some information about the treatment for disease. ***

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 03/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Did Medicine Improve In the Middle Ages?

    4 star(s)

    Instead, they performed experiments and carefully observed patients as their illnesses progressed. In this way they made records of symptoms and treatments which were used throughout their Empire. By the Middle Ages, people had forgotten this knowledge, which was only developed in the Arab world.

  2. How and why did castles change over time?

    This castle was a great improvement from the round keep. These castles had two or three curtain walls more than 6 metres thick. The inner walls were higher than the outer wall so men on all walls could fire at the enemy.

  1. Why was the Roman Army so Successful? Rome was one ...

    They also had weapons called artilleries. Artilleries were huge weapons such as the Ballista and catapulta. The Ballista fired huge arrows which were very harmful. The catapulta, was usually loaded with huge boulders, or pot of oil which were set on fire.

  2. The Causes of World War 1

    Empire to become more independent it might be able to gain more land. So both Germany and Russia had alternative motives. Britain had hoped to stay out of this war but when the Germans invaded Belgium- the British recalled their Treats of London (1839)

  1. Describe the political, social and religious situation of Palestine during the first century AD ...

    The next group of people were called the Pharisees, their main aim was to try to live strictly by the laws of God (i.e. the Torah). The Pharisees believed in angels, resurrection and an after life. Most of them were good sincere men trying to do good, but some (the

  2. Medicine Through Time Timeline

    1848 First Public Health Act in Britain ? It allowed local authorities to make improvements if they wanted to & if ratepayers gave them their support. It enabled local authorities to borrow money to pay for the improvements. It was largely ineffective as it was not made compulsory for Councils to enforce it.

  1. How and why did castles change from 1066 to 1550?

    society with respect for law and order and the authority of the government. Fortified manor houses were used to show wealth and power of nobles and to show that England was more settled ? little risk of rebellion but were also defensive if needed.

  2. The History of Bradford. How Undercliffe Cemetery display the values of the Victorians.

    to stand out therefore they are painted with a white colour bringing out their importance whereas the workers and servants are daubed with a dull colour which shows how they were kept in the dark and were not to be seen.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work