• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did The First World War Break Out in 1914?

Extracts from this document...


Why Did The First World War Break Out in 1914? The First World War was the most terrible war ever known due to the number of deaths that took place each day on the gory battlefields of the war. Altogether eight million soldiers lost their lives fighting in the trenches. The system of trenches stretched across Europe from the English Channel to Switzerland and soldiers faced their foe across a few hundred metres of churned up ground with barbed wire known as 'No Man's Land'. The grounds in and around the trenches were turned into a huge ocean of mud because of the rain and exploding bullets. It was impossible to attack the other side's trenches effectively because they were so greatly secured. Twenty million people were wounded and there was an extensive destruction, which ravaged cities and their civilian populations. The First World War lasted for four whole years and broke out in 1914 due to a number of reasons. The reasons that led the nations of Europe and later the world to go to war in 1914 are complex, and it is impossible to say the war started because of one single cause. There are a series of events, which derived in the early 19th century, which engulfed most of Europe by 4th August 1914. Some causes of the war were long-term whereas others were short term. One reason for the outbreak of the war in 1914 was the competition for colonies between the European countries, especially Germany who wanted a large empire and colonies like Britain. In 1800 both Britain and France had large empires and these continued to grow in the nineteenth century. Italy and Germany both became united countries for the first time in the 1870s and they also wanted to have overseas empires. The German endeavour to become a world power with its own remote empire was the personal ambition of the young Kaiser Wilhelm II who came to power in Germany in 1888. ...read more.


Also the Triple Entente surrounded the Triple Alliance therefore they had a greater chance of winning because they could attack the Triple Alliance from three places at once, which is basically the reason the suspicion in the Triple Alliance grew. As you can see from all the evidence above it would only have taken a small trigger to set the stage for war with guns blazing high in the sky like the sound of fireworks high above but without the same joy, immense and agonised violence, moans turning into ear-piercing yells and pitiful sobs and a chain reaction throughout Europe. The small spark that set the whole war off was when Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austrian Throne and his wife, Sophie were assassinated in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia. There had been much hatred of the Austrian rule in Bosnia, especially amongst the Serbs who wanted to join with Serbia. There had been six attempts altogether by the Serbs to take the lives of the Austrian Royal Family between 1910 and 1914 and they finally succeeded on June 29, 1914. The Archduke had ignored warnings of a possible assassination plot "Some young Serb might put a live rather than a blank cartridge in his gun and fire it," and his wife's Sophie's advice who had begged him not to go to Sarajevo because of the threats of assassination. Unfortunately, Archduke did not heed his wife's advice. He decided to accept the invitation of Bosnia's governor, General Oskar Potoirek, to inspect the army manoeuvres being held outside Sarajevo. The Archduke's role as Inspector General of the Army made the visit logical. It had also been four years since an important Hapsburg had made a goodwill visit to Bosnia. He toured the capital on the anniversary of the 1389 battle of Kosovo, St. Vitus's Day. This battle was a mortifying memory for all Serbs, in which the Turks, ending Serbia's independence as a nation, defeated Serbia. ...read more.


competition for colonies led to the naval race because Britain were afraid that Germany would become too powerful and dominate Europe, as the size of the German army and navy was increasing and it was Germany's desire to dominate Europe. This then led to Britain's rivalry with Germany which led to the alliances been formed for protection, which then led to Germany being anxious about being surrounded by France and Russia and forming the Schlieffen Plan. Also the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand led to the behaviour of Austria towards Serbia because Austria blamed Serbia of the assassination, therefore those two reasons were also linked. I have also come to the conclusion that I think the most important reason was the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand. I think this because although all the other causes led to another thing such as the two alliances being formed led to suspicion between the main countries growing but they didn't actually spark the war off. I think if the Archduke hadn't been assassinated then perhaps there wouldn't have been a First World War, as this triggered off the war and started a chain reaction throughout Europe and later involving the United States of America. Also if the Archduke Franz Ferdinand had not been assassinated then Austria wouldn't have blamed Serbia for anything and Serbia wouldn't have turned to Russia for help etc. However all the other causes of the war such as the alliance system helped make the war a European War and later a World War instead of a war between Austria and Serbia. I think all the reasons together, long or short term, added up to make a war and it would only have been a matter of time before a war started. Therefore I think that the First World War broke out due to all the causes because it is impossible to say it broke out due to one reason but the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand triggered the war off. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is an incredibly detailed account that demonstrates excellent understanding and offers useful analysis to explain why the war breaks out. At one point, the author drifts into narrating events, which weakens the answer, but it is a very strong response overall. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 01/12/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Were the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair?

    4 star(s)

    Austria was reduced to a small, mountainous country - the Treaty of Saint-Germain humiliated a proud country and was bound to cause discontent. The Treaty of S�vres was very unfair on Turkey; nearly all of her land was given away to her enemy Greece.

  2. Germany was to blame for causing World War One.

    This caused the other countries such as Britain to build up their Navy and France to build up their army. France thought that Germany were going to attack so the put troops on the boarder between Franc and Germany but thins didn't help when Germany attacked through Belgium.

  1. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    * B. Unified themselves to compete with other countries. * C. Asked the government to protect their interests especially the merchants (middle class). - However, later nationalism developed to be militarism. - Usually, people needed to use force/war to succeed unification. - Therefore gradually they believed that problems should be solved by using force/war.

  2. League of Nations -aims, achievements and weaknesses.

    This was a drastic failure on the League's part, very much due to their organization. Another failure was when Germany brought troops into the Rhineland in 1936, directly violating the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. France and Britain, however did nothing as they both wanted to avoid war.

  1. Long term Causes of World War 1

    The Austrians had been looking for an excuse to declare war on Serbia and when Serbia turned down the ultimatum, Bingo! WW1 started because of both long and short term causes ...such as: Short Term: 1) In Sarajevo, in 1914 the Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated by a Serb, Gavrilo Princip.

  2. How and why did the Alliance System contribute to the outbreak of the First ...

    On June 28, 1914, Archduke Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian Empire and his wife were assassinated by a Bosnian Serb, called Gavrilo Princip in Sarajevo. As the assassination was supported by a Serbian secret society called the Black Hand, Austria put the responsibility on Serbia. After receiving unlimited support (i.e.

  1. Did the successes of the Vienna settlement ou tweigh its failures?

    France was the main issue of the Congress. Ensuring France was unable to reinvade Europe was the key issue from which all the others branched. Despite losing the war, France was allowed to take part in the settlement negotiations. This meant that, unlike in Versailles a century later, the losing side would have less reason to feel wronged.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    The League of Nations quickly acted to stamp out cholera, smallpox and dysentery in the camps saving hundreds of lives. With the International labour Organisation the League of Nations was able to ban poisonous white lead from paints. Also it managed to limit the hours that small children could work.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work