• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's

Extracts from this document...


Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's? The League of Nations was a failure in the 1930s because of British and French self-interest. The British and the French were the main nations in the League, as such; they were the countries which determined the outcome of decisions made by the League as a whole. However, these leading nations often made decisions based on their self interest which opposes the idea of collective security which the organization stood for. The League of Nations failed in the 1930's because countries began to realise that the League didn't have any power and the League's only way to stop them was to emplace trade sanctions on them. One of the Leagues major failures in the 1930's was when Japan invaded Manchuria, Japan invaded Manchuria because in September 1931 an explosion on the South Manchurian railway which was owned by Japan. ...read more.


However, this was a violation of one of the Leagues most important rule. Everything depended on Britain and France, but they needed Mussolini's friendship because they saw him as potential ally against the growing power of Hitler. The League imposed trade sanctions, by which League members were not allowed to trade with Italy, however this sanctions did not include basic war materials like oil and coal. Britain left the Suez Canal open for Italy to use, so Mussolini could supply his troops and continue the invasion. Again this showed to everybody that the only way the League would try and stop you would be to place trade sanctions on you. Also because Manchuria was so far away not very many people were worried about it, but because this one involved Italy which was much closer to home, lots of people realised that the League was powerless to deal with major problems. ...read more.


Decisions were very slow; when a crisis occurred, the League was supposed to act quickly. However, in many cases the League didn't meet frequently enough and when they did they often took to long to make decisions. You can see this as when Japan invaded Manchuria the League took seven months to send Lord Lytton to start an inquiry. In conclusion The League of Nations failed in the 1930's because people began to realise that it was powerless to deal with major threats unless Britain and France helped, and even then they rarely did anything. Secondly the fact that Britain and France put there own self-interests before the League meant that it didn't have a "back-bone" to stand up against nations. And finally the fact that America and other nations was a reason why the League failed, because nobody would listen to them without the major power in the world. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tom Banks ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's?

    Without the major powers such as the USA and USSR, the League lacked power and therefore authority and sanctions were not effective. So there was never any real force and power supporting the League and it decisions. The Leagues main weapon was supposed to be economic sanction, but they didn't

  2. What were the consequences of the failure of the league in the 1930s?

    The more influential members of the league saw how they could manipulate the system and use their position in the league to their advantage. In February 1933, instead of withdrawing, Japan announced that they would invade more of China. The only countries that had a definite force to beat the Japanese were the USSR and USA.

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    left in the league were seen to have secret meetings with Italy. This greatly undermined the belief in the league. Also, people in Europe thought that Japan was so far away from them that they didn't need to worry too much about what occurred somewhere on the other side of the world.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    The main idea of the council was that if any of its members came to a dispute the council would discuss the situation without the issue leading to war. it this failed the council could use a range of powers: moral condemnation, economic and financial sanctions and military force.

  1. Why the League of Nations Failed?

    The Council was a smaller group that met few times a year and for emergencies. It included permanent members which were Britain, France, Italy and Japan.

  2. The failures of Gallipoli

    would have died, and less soldiers would have been needed to be sent to Turkey. Then maybe their would not have been inadequate forces there. There were other reasons for the failures of Gallipoli, for example the weather. This could not be controlled, but the commanders should have put more thought into what the weather would do.

  1. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    It did everything the Japanese Army told it to do. Later in 1932, Japanese airplanes and gunships bombed Shangai.

  2. Why did the League fail to stop the Japanese Invasion of Manchuria?

    grateful that the Japanese did not invade Australia because it is their land. Also the last point of the letter mentions how the league believe that this invasion would be beneficial because the league did not like communism and this invasion would be a ?block? against it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work