• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's

Extracts from this document...


Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's? The League of Nations was a failure in the 1930s because of British and French self-interest. The British and the French were the main nations in the League, as such; they were the countries which determined the outcome of decisions made by the League as a whole. However, these leading nations often made decisions based on their self interest which opposes the idea of collective security which the organization stood for. The League of Nations failed in the 1930's because countries began to realise that the League didn't have any power and the League's only way to stop them was to emplace trade sanctions on them. One of the Leagues major failures in the 1930's was when Japan invaded Manchuria, Japan invaded Manchuria because in September 1931 an explosion on the South Manchurian railway which was owned by Japan. ...read more.


However, this was a violation of one of the Leagues most important rule. Everything depended on Britain and France, but they needed Mussolini's friendship because they saw him as potential ally against the growing power of Hitler. The League imposed trade sanctions, by which League members were not allowed to trade with Italy, however this sanctions did not include basic war materials like oil and coal. Britain left the Suez Canal open for Italy to use, so Mussolini could supply his troops and continue the invasion. Again this showed to everybody that the only way the League would try and stop you would be to place trade sanctions on you. Also because Manchuria was so far away not very many people were worried about it, but because this one involved Italy which was much closer to home, lots of people realised that the League was powerless to deal with major problems. ...read more.


Decisions were very slow; when a crisis occurred, the League was supposed to act quickly. However, in many cases the League didn't meet frequently enough and when they did they often took to long to make decisions. You can see this as when Japan invaded Manchuria the League took seven months to send Lord Lytton to start an inquiry. In conclusion The League of Nations failed in the 1930's because people began to realise that it was powerless to deal with major threats unless Britain and France helped, and even then they rarely did anything. Secondly the fact that Britain and France put there own self-interests before the League meant that it didn't have a "back-bone" to stand up against nations. And finally the fact that America and other nations was a reason why the League failed, because nobody would listen to them without the major power in the world. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tom Banks ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930s?

    This meant those who had lost badly by those treaties regarded it with suspicion. * Members of the league, especially Britain and France, were always torn between self-interest and the needs of the league. Usually, self-interest won. * Sanctions were hard to put into action.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    Another reason why the Abyssinian crisis was a death blow to the league and the Manchurian crisis was not is because France and Britain could have at least done something to stop the Abyssinian crisis by closing the Suez Canal, they couldn't have done much to stop the Manchurian crisis

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    Both the assembly and council experienced some troubles and tough decisions. The power of VETO prevented many good decisions being made and the implementation of collective security. The collective security system worked such that any member that was attacked would have sanctions and military force applied against them by all members.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's?

    Thirdly many Americans weren't keen on joining closely with Britain and France as they were anti-British or anti-French and thought the League would be controlled by Britain and Franc. Finally they didn't agree with trade bans as a weapon or a way of sorting out disputes.

  1. What were the consequences of the failure of the league in the 1930s?

    The more influential members of the league saw how they could manipulate the system and use their position in the league to their advantage. In February 1933, instead of withdrawing, Japan announced that they would invade more of China. The only countries that had a definite force to beat the Japanese were the USSR and USA.

  2. Japanese Invade Manchuria

    Alternatively, the League of Nations also had its down falls. In the 1920's it tried to encourage disarmament. Even Britain and France ONLY agreed to limit the size of their navies. This did not show any fairness in the League; so it is likely that all other countries would not disarm allow either.

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    The League of Nations had some success in the 1920's but by 1937 it had become irrelevant and ignored even by its main members Britain and France. The League of Nations was an official failure! From looking at the evidence above I have decided that I do not agree that

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    But the significance of the Manchurian Crisis was obvious. It was the first of several incidents that would lead to the downfall of the League -The 1932-34 Disarmament Conference: The League had not been successful in this area in the 1920s, but the international climate back then did not make it a pressing matter.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work