• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's

Extracts from this document...


Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's? The League of Nations was a failure in the 1930s because of British and French self-interest. The British and the French were the main nations in the League, as such; they were the countries which determined the outcome of decisions made by the League as a whole. However, these leading nations often made decisions based on their self interest which opposes the idea of collective security which the organization stood for. The League of Nations failed in the 1930's because countries began to realise that the League didn't have any power and the League's only way to stop them was to emplace trade sanctions on them. One of the Leagues major failures in the 1930's was when Japan invaded Manchuria, Japan invaded Manchuria because in September 1931 an explosion on the South Manchurian railway which was owned by Japan. ...read more.


However, this was a violation of one of the Leagues most important rule. Everything depended on Britain and France, but they needed Mussolini's friendship because they saw him as potential ally against the growing power of Hitler. The League imposed trade sanctions, by which League members were not allowed to trade with Italy, however this sanctions did not include basic war materials like oil and coal. Britain left the Suez Canal open for Italy to use, so Mussolini could supply his troops and continue the invasion. Again this showed to everybody that the only way the League would try and stop you would be to place trade sanctions on you. Also because Manchuria was so far away not very many people were worried about it, but because this one involved Italy which was much closer to home, lots of people realised that the League was powerless to deal with major problems. ...read more.


Decisions were very slow; when a crisis occurred, the League was supposed to act quickly. However, in many cases the League didn't meet frequently enough and when they did they often took to long to make decisions. You can see this as when Japan invaded Manchuria the League took seven months to send Lord Lytton to start an inquiry. In conclusion The League of Nations failed in the 1930's because people began to realise that it was powerless to deal with major threats unless Britain and France helped, and even then they rarely did anything. Secondly the fact that Britain and France put there own self-interests before the League meant that it didn't have a "back-bone" to stand up against nations. And finally the fact that America and other nations was a reason why the League failed, because nobody would listen to them without the major power in the world. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tom Banks ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    Both the assembly and council experienced some troubles and tough decisions. The power of VETO prevented many good decisions being made and the implementation of collective security. The collective security system worked such that any member that was attacked would have sanctions and military force applied against them by all members.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's?

    Without the major powers such as the USA and USSR, the League lacked power and therefore authority and sanctions were not effective. So there was never any real force and power supporting the League and it decisions. The Leagues main weapon was supposed to be economic sanction, but they didn't


    Yet she also continued to keep the allies under her authority. Athenian garrisons were placed in rebellious states to serve a military purpose in the favour of Athenian interests. They were also set up to protect Athenian governors who installed democratic governments within these states.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  1. The League of Nations

    Japan had marched into Manchuria to gain extra resources during the depression and refused to move. At this point, the League should have started issuing sanctioning but Britain and France didn't want to do anything to offend Japan as they wanted to keep them on side against the threat of communist Russia.

  2. Why the League of Nations Failed?

    and also the Americans disagreed with the idea. Also Disarmament was impossible to achieve. For example the French thought that disarmament was a threat to their country, while the failure of other countries to disarm was disastrous, Germany took advantage of it and saw it as a break through to rearm themselves.

  1. How Far Do You Agree That It Was Clear From The Beginning That The ...

    Although not all wounds had been healed after the First World War and many nations still harboured resentment to other countries for various reasons. Italy and Japan were angry with Britain and France as they felt that they did not get what they were promised for fighting alongside them in the First World War.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    There were all sorts of excuses for the League?s failure. Japan was so far away, it was a special case, it had a point about China was in the grip of anarchy. But the significance of the Manchurian Crisis was obvious.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work