• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's

Extracts from this document...


Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's? The League of Nations came into existence on the 10th January 1920. It came into existence on exactly the same day that the Treaty of Versailles came into operation. The League of Nations was based in Geneva, Switzerland. When the League came into existence , it had aims which were to stop war and settle international disputes, to improve people's lives and to improve people's jobs. It also had another aim which was to enforce the Treaty of Versailles. The structure of the League was the Secretariat, which was supposed to so-ordinate the different functions of the League and a disadvantage of the secretariat was that there were too few secretaries to do the work who were also slow. There was also the Council which met four or five times a year. ...read more.


However, no matter how hopeful and optimistic the supporters of the League of Nations were about the future in 1930, there was a downfall in the League. The League's authority was challenged quite a lot of times by the Japanese invasion of Manchuria, and later by the Italian attack on Abyssinia. My reasons for this are that in 1931, when the Japanese troops invaded the Chinese land of Manchuria, the Chinese appealed to the League. China's appeal took over the Japanese troops and the League ordered Japan to remove the Japanese troops from Manchuria. Unfortunately, Japan refused so the League decided to govern the area themselves. Japan once again refused this, so it withdrew itself from the League. Neither economic or military sanctions were thought about, so this showed up as the first weakness that the League of Nations had. ...read more.


After December 1939, the League did not meet again. The reason why I think that the League of Nations was partly a failure, was because it failed to keep the peace in the world. As my conclusion, the League of Nations to me was not successful because it did not have much stability to be successful. It has a good enough structure, but as the Assembly only met once a year then this shows me that it seems as though they did not try hard enough as they could of met up more and organised meetings to discuss other matters that could happen. It was also quite stuck when Mussolini ignored the League's sanctions and had disobeyed them. Mussolini thought that it would be fine to do this as the League didn't give strict sanctions so Mussolini. Another weakness from the League was that it did not include the most strictest sanctions that it could of to have been a successful League of Nations. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's

    Yet the League had no armed forces of it's own and relied on the co-operation of it's members. Britain and France, however, in their own self-interest were not willing to commit troops to the cause and never did.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    The assembly was essentially the leagues parliament. The assembly would listen to disputes and come to a decision on how to proceed. Every country in the league sent a representative to the assembly. It could recommend actions to the Council and could vote on: * Admitting new members to the league.

  1. How successful was the league in the 1920's and 1930's?

    And when Britain and France that could of tried to fill the gap in of witch America is missing they did not show full commitment to the league of nations and cares only for their own nation and interests.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's?

    willingly impose them because it was feared without the USA they'd not work. Some British politicians felt that the trade sanctions would only work if America applied them. The sanctions were easily broken after they had been made as they had a fear of the Americans not supporting the sanctions and its members' economic interests would be further damaged.


    Athens confiscated the Thasians' navy and stripped them of their independence, lowering them to a tribute-paying state. The siege could have been successful for the Thasians, as during these two years they appealed to Sparta for assistance. Sparta agreed to help but were disrupted by the occurrence of an earthquake and the threat of a revolt among the helots.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  1. The League of Nations

    In the Manchurian crisis, Japan wasn't worried about the League's ruling against it as it knew that the decision wouldn't be enforced. If the League had had an army, Japan might have paid it more attention and even if she didn't, the army could have been sent in to make things a lot more difficult for Japan.

  2. Why the League of Nations Failed?

    So the League couldn't really do much because Japan were right about China promising them that and they also had a permanent seat in the Council, but Japan had used military force to get into Manchuria and to take over which was against the League of Nations policies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work