• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930s?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930s? Most historians agree that in the 1930s the League of Nations was a failure. In the following paragraphs the reasons for this failure will be discussed. 1.World Economic Depression The Wall Street Crash (1929) shook the economic foundations of the United States, contributing to the development of the World Economic Depression, a world-wide economic slump. It brought unemployment and falling living standards to most countries, and caused extreme right-wing governments to come to power in Japan and Germany; together with Mussolini, they refused to keep to the rules and took a series of actions which revealed the League's weaknesses (see point 3 and 4). 2.Japanese invasion of Manchuria On September 18 1931, officers of Japan's Army blew up a section of track on the South Manchuria Railway. Claiming the explosion was the work of Chinese saboteurs, Japanese forces occupied key cities in southern Manchuria. ...read more.


The Japanese government instead announced that it was going to withdraw from the League. 3.Disarmament Conference The next big failure of the League of Nations was over disarmament. The Conference failed for a number of reasons. Some say it was all doomed from the start. No one was very serious about disarmament anyway. But there were other factors at work. It didn't help that Britain and France were divided on this issue. By 1933 many British people were beginning to feel that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair. In fact, to the dismay of the French, the British signed an agreement with Germany in 1935 which allowed Germany to build up its navy as long as it stayed under 35 per cent of the size of the British navy. Britain didn't consult either its allies or the League about this, although it was also in violation of the Treaty of Versailles. ...read more.


A few weeks later sanctions were abandoned, and Mussolini had successfully flouted the League. Again Britain and France must share the blame for the League's failure. Their motive was the desire not to antagonise Mussolini too much, so as to keep him as an ally against the real danger - Germany. But the results were disastrous: � Mussolini was annoyed by the sanctions anyway, and began to draw closer to Hitler; � Small states lost all faith in the League; and � Hitler was encouraged to break the Treaty of Versailles. After 1935, therefore, the League was never taken seriously again. The real explanation for the failure of the League was simple: when aggressive states such as Japan, Italy and Germany defied it, the League members, especially France and Britain, were not prepared to support it, either by decisive economic measures or by military action. The League was only as strong as the determination of its leading members to stand up to aggression - unfortunately, determination of that sort was sadly lacking during the 1930s. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Explain why the League of Nations failed to deal successfully with the Japanese invasion ...

    This would stop countries from bickering over other countries having their men. It also helped the refugee crisis in turkey in 1922, housing hundreds of thousands of people in refugee camps and quickly stamped out cholera, smallpox and dysentery in the camps.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    They have to have more. They are so greedy they created a dictat in which they are in control. Next this essay will look at one of the specific areas in which Germany were punished by the treaty of Versailles.

  1. Was the league of nations a complete failure?

    In May 1936 Italian troops invaded the Abyssinian capital of Addis Ababa, before this the Emperor, Haile Selassie fled to Geneva and spoke to the League of Nations outlining the failure of the league in protecting his country from aggression and invasion.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    * Appointing temporary members of the council * The budget of the league * Other ideas put forward by the council. The assembly only met once a year. All decisions made by the league had to be unanimous. The council was a smaller group that met more frequently, about five times a year and in a time of emergency.

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    Mussolini launched a full-scale invasion on Abyssinia and despite their resistance the Abyssinians were no match for the Italian army. This was a clear case of a powerful state attacking a smaller one. The league was designed for disputes such as this and, unlike in the Manchurian crisis, it was in the ideal place to act.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's?

    For example in Britain, the Cabinet was informed that because of the ban on coal exports to Italy, 30,000 British coal miners were about to lose their jobs. Therefore the League again lacked the power to enforce the decisions made by its Assembly and Council.

  1. "The League of Nations was doomed to failure from the start" - discuss.

    Another success for the league came in the same year and was over the Aaland Islands; which both Sweden and Finland claimed as their own, again the land was split. Two years later, Mussolini wanting to flex his political muscles.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work