• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the League of Nations Fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the League of Nations Fail ? The absence of the United States definitely made a difference to the League - it was the only major world power outside the League. The presence of USA would not have made such a great deal of difference in the thirties because of the Wall Street crash and ensuing depression. It could be argued that the USA could never have made the League work in the long-term because there would always be a strong public motion against its involvement. Washington's theory of isolationism was deeply ingrained in the average American's psyche. Even if the USA had been part of the League in the beginning, it is highly probable that they would have withdrawn interest after October 1929, if not withdrawn altogether. Having said all that, the remaining members of the League could have combined and made a force to be reckoned with. ...read more.

Middle

The world wide depression had hit Japan hard and many people within Japan saw conquering new territory as a way out of the depression. During the night of September 18, Japanese soldiers blew up a section of the Japanese railroad and blamed the explosion on the Chinese and so had an excuse to occupied the city of Shenyang. China asked for the Leagues help. The League ordered the troops to withdraw. Japan agreed to order the withdrawl of the troops, but the Japanese government did not have control over their troops. The Japanese army continued to advance into Manchuria. By the end of 1931 the Japanese troops had control of the entire province of Manchuria which they renamed Manchukuo. The League of Nations was meant to keep the peace through 'collective security'. If persuasion did not work, the League could use economic sanctions (a ban on trade with the attacker) ...read more.

Conclusion

(These are vital to modern warfare.) So half-hearted were the sanctions that Italy was able to complete the conquest of Abyssina by May 1936. A few weeks later sanctions were abandoned and Mussolini had flouted the League. Britain and France had not wanted to antagonise Mussolini and had even tried to form a secret deal with him during the invasion to give him two thirds of Abyssinia. They did not want to push him into an alliance with Hitler. Mussolini was annoyed by the sanctions anyway and began to draw closer to Hitler; small states lost faith in the League; and Hitler himself was encouraged to break the Versailles Treaty. After 1935, the League was not taken seriously again. I conlude that the league had problems before it started with the USA not joining and this meant that it would be a uphill struggle and with problems taking place in Abbysinya and Manchuria meant that the league struggled and proved to be weak. People such as Hitler saw this and proved to come out on top of the battle each time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Explain why the League of Nations failed to deal successfully with the Japanese invasion ...

    to China, the Japanese decided to invade even more of China and after disputes in the treaty the Japanese resigned and invaded Jehol. The league finally got into disputes between countries to whether or not they should trade with Japan.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    France also wasn't prepared to be strong and wasn't prepared to uphold the agreements of the League of Nations. Britain's govement was pacifist meaning it was downscaling its own military. During the 1920's many nations were exhausted after world war one and in the process of reconstruction.

  1. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    In this incident, both Finland and Sweden respected the power of the League and thus approved the League's decision to allocate the Islands to Finland. Although the League did have many failures at a political level, this may be explained by the timeframe in which the League was forced to operate.

  2. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    Surely if the aims of Athens' reformed league have been for filled, it would have seemed only fair to cancel the contributions. Athens may have intended on continuing the contributions so as to be safe and assured for her future security, or even for her own personal intentions (the rebuilding of her temples and walls).

  1. Mao Gandhi Compare Contrast Essay

    Gandhi from an early age had adopted the strategy of embracing the consequences when non-cooperating with the British subjects, as part of his resistance. Mao, on the other hand, scorned the idea of non-violence and stated, "War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun."

  2. Great Depression

    The main problem was, although everything seemed to be runned perfectly, that most of the Americans who could afford cars, fridges, washers, etc. Already had bought them and so there was no sense of keeping producing these as no one will by them.

  1. How successful was the League of Nations up to 1929?

    Article 10 was an attempt to guarantee the territorial integrity and political independence of member states against aggression. Articles 11 through 17 provided for the establishment of the Permanent Court of International Justice for arbitration and conciliation, and for sanctions against aggressors.

  2. Was the League of Nations likely to fail because of inherent flaws?

    Without any military force people saw the League as weak and powerless to do any thing about what they were doing. At no point in the League's history did were any troops used by the League. For example, in the Manchurian Crisis the League members just kept using the excuse

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work