• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the League of Nations Fail?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the League of Nations Fail ? The absence of the United States definitely made a difference to the League - it was the only major world power outside the League. The presence of USA would not have made such a great deal of difference in the thirties because of the Wall Street crash and ensuing depression. It could be argued that the USA could never have made the League work in the long-term because there would always be a strong public motion against its involvement. Washington's theory of isolationism was deeply ingrained in the average American's psyche. Even if the USA had been part of the League in the beginning, it is highly probable that they would have withdrawn interest after October 1929, if not withdrawn altogether. Having said all that, the remaining members of the League could have combined and made a force to be reckoned with. ...read more.


The world wide depression had hit Japan hard and many people within Japan saw conquering new territory as a way out of the depression. During the night of September 18, Japanese soldiers blew up a section of the Japanese railroad and blamed the explosion on the Chinese and so had an excuse to occupied the city of Shenyang. China asked for the Leagues help. The League ordered the troops to withdraw. Japan agreed to order the withdrawl of the troops, but the Japanese government did not have control over their troops. The Japanese army continued to advance into Manchuria. By the end of 1931 the Japanese troops had control of the entire province of Manchuria which they renamed Manchukuo. The League of Nations was meant to keep the peace through 'collective security'. If persuasion did not work, the League could use economic sanctions (a ban on trade with the attacker) ...read more.


(These are vital to modern warfare.) So half-hearted were the sanctions that Italy was able to complete the conquest of Abyssina by May 1936. A few weeks later sanctions were abandoned and Mussolini had flouted the League. Britain and France had not wanted to antagonise Mussolini and had even tried to form a secret deal with him during the invasion to give him two thirds of Abyssinia. They did not want to push him into an alliance with Hitler. Mussolini was annoyed by the sanctions anyway and began to draw closer to Hitler; small states lost faith in the League; and Hitler himself was encouraged to break the Versailles Treaty. After 1935, the League was not taken seriously again. I conlude that the league had problems before it started with the USA not joining and this meant that it would be a uphill struggle and with problems taking place in Abbysinya and Manchuria meant that the league struggled and proved to be weak. People such as Hitler saw this and proved to come out on top of the battle each time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Explain why the League of Nations failed to deal successfully with the Japanese invasion ...

    to China, the Japanese decided to invade even more of China and after disputes in the treaty the Japanese resigned and invaded Jehol. The league finally got into disputes between countries to whether or not they should trade with Japan.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    not use whatever strength Germany had to support its campaign against aggressor nations. Russia was also not allowed to join as in 1917; she had a communist government that generated fear in Western Europe. Such a country could not be allowed to take its place in the League.

  1. The League of Nations

    In the 1930s, the League faced other challenges unsuccessfully such as Manchuria, the failure of disarmament and Abyssinia. The causes for the league's failure in these crises were highlighted in the previous question. The failure of disarmament meant the failure of one of the League's objectives, "To encourage nations to disarm."

  2. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    France was a key member of the League, which made this event seem somewhat hypocritical of the League since France, a member of the League, was clearly breaking rules within the Covenant of the League. Another event which led to even greater criticisms of the League occurred between 1935-1936 when

  1. How successful was the League of Nations up to 1929?

    the Aland Islands (1920-1921), guaranteeing the security of Albania (1921), settling the division of Upper Silesia (1922), and preventing the outbreak of war in the Balkans between Greece and Bulgaria (1925). It also rescued Austria from what could have potential been economic disaster by providing desperately needed financial aid.

  2. Colonialism and the experience of Singapore.

    Britain and Argentina also fought over the Falkland Islands. Spain's mission had been to spread Christianity to Africa, but they did so in a very brutal way and all who refused conversion were executed. Also, the more colonies or land a country has, the more powerful it is seen as.

  1. Great Depression

    The main problem was, although everything seemed to be runned perfectly, that most of the Americans who could afford cars, fridges, washers, etc. Already had bought them and so there was no sense of keeping producing these as no one will by them.

  2. Mao Gandhi Compare Contrast Essay

    Like Gandhi, "Mao manifested a strong sense of nationalism even in early youth and also a spirit of social reform" (Sinha III-1). Their postures, appearances, behavior, languages and 'symbols/methods of political action that they innovated,' displayed their fervor for complete independence from (Western)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work