• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the League of Nations Fail?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the League of Nations Fail ? The absence of the United States definitely made a difference to the League - it was the only major world power outside the League. The presence of USA would not have made such a great deal of difference in the thirties because of the Wall Street crash and ensuing depression. It could be argued that the USA could never have made the League work in the long-term because there would always be a strong public motion against its involvement. Washington's theory of isolationism was deeply ingrained in the average American's psyche. Even if the USA had been part of the League in the beginning, it is highly probable that they would have withdrawn interest after October 1929, if not withdrawn altogether. Having said all that, the remaining members of the League could have combined and made a force to be reckoned with. ...read more.


The world wide depression had hit Japan hard and many people within Japan saw conquering new territory as a way out of the depression. During the night of September 18, Japanese soldiers blew up a section of the Japanese railroad and blamed the explosion on the Chinese and so had an excuse to occupied the city of Shenyang. China asked for the Leagues help. The League ordered the troops to withdraw. Japan agreed to order the withdrawl of the troops, but the Japanese government did not have control over their troops. The Japanese army continued to advance into Manchuria. By the end of 1931 the Japanese troops had control of the entire province of Manchuria which they renamed Manchukuo. The League of Nations was meant to keep the peace through 'collective security'. If persuasion did not work, the League could use economic sanctions (a ban on trade with the attacker) ...read more.


(These are vital to modern warfare.) So half-hearted were the sanctions that Italy was able to complete the conquest of Abyssina by May 1936. A few weeks later sanctions were abandoned and Mussolini had flouted the League. Britain and France had not wanted to antagonise Mussolini and had even tried to form a secret deal with him during the invasion to give him two thirds of Abyssinia. They did not want to push him into an alliance with Hitler. Mussolini was annoyed by the sanctions anyway and began to draw closer to Hitler; small states lost faith in the League; and Hitler himself was encouraged to break the Versailles Treaty. After 1935, the League was not taken seriously again. I conlude that the league had problems before it started with the USA not joining and this meant that it would be a uphill struggle and with problems taking place in Abbysinya and Manchuria meant that the league struggled and proved to be weak. People such as Hitler saw this and proved to come out on top of the battle each time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Explain why the League of Nations failed to deal successfully with the Japanese invasion ...

    to China, the Japanese decided to invade even more of China and after disputes in the treaty the Japanese resigned and invaded Jehol. The league finally got into disputes between countries to whether or not they should trade with Japan.

  2. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    In such an incident like Italy's conquest of Abyssinia, perhaps the League's capabilities were restricted by the fear of pressing Mussolini into allying with Hitler. This may have reduced the power and ability of the League, thus it is not completely justifiable to deem the League powerless.

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    France also wasn't prepared to be strong and wasn't prepared to uphold the agreements of the League of Nations. Britain's govement was pacifist meaning it was downscaling its own military. During the 1920's many nations were exhausted after world war one and in the process of reconstruction.

  2. Mao Gandhi Compare Contrast Essay

    The Civil Disobedience Movement, which was launched by Gandhi as part of his peaceful schemes, wouldn't have probably served as a solution to the large-scale extermination campaigns launched by Jiang Jeishi (leader of opposition party KMT) on the communists, as "At that time India was a negative example of what Communist China had wanted to follow" (Sinha III-1).

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    It was designed to prevent future war. This was what he wanted as America had no need to punish German.( Reasons already stated ). This idea was probably put across to the German people to try and get the government off the hook. It would try to be saying ' look it is not that bad '.

  2. Great Depression

    In June 1929, official figures showed a fall in industrial production, this meant that factories were producing less, and so investigators started to sell their shares. There was a big fall in share prices, and banks tried to buy shares to stop the fall in prices but on Monday the


    revolts were failures to produce [contributions]...and sometimes a refusal to produce any ships at all'. Failure to produce these payments caused uproar among the Athenians. Strongly determined to uphold the aims of the Delian League, they treated such actions almost to the extent of treachery.

  2. Was the League of Nations likely to fail because of inherent flaws?

    that Japan was half-way round the world and that it was too difficult for them to get their troops there. The nations in the League were very unbalanced. Most of them came from Europe. This meant that the League had very little interest outside Europe even though the two major crises, Abyssinian and Manchurian, weren't even in Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work