• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the liberal government try and fail to give Home Rule to Ireland in the years 1920-1914?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the liberal government try and fail to give Home Rule to Ireland in the years 1920-1914? In his speech at the Albert Hall on December 10th 1909, Asquith, the Prime Minister at this time, made what many saw as a definite commitment to introduce a Home Rule Bill for Ireland in the next parliament if the liberals were re-elected. Two years later, after the long drawn out constitutional crisis came to an end, the liberal government introduced the Home Rule Bill of 1912 . Some historians, such a Patricia Jalland saw the introduction of the bill as a result of an ideological, long standing commitment. She argues that the liberals must have had an overwhelming belief in home rule if they were prepared to endure the stresses that followed its introduction. She severely opposes the common view that the bill was only introduced due to over-reliance on Irish Nationalist votes in order to maintain liberal power, as the liberals would have still had a majority, without the support of the Irish Nationalists. ...read more.


Britain also still made any financial decisions for Ireland. If anything, the introduction of the home rule bill would have effectively been like placing some Irish people in the existing British House of Lords - they would have gained minimal influence, but absolutely no power. This bill, however limited, still nearly caused a civil war. The conservatives, who were now lead by Andrew Bonar-Law, a much tougher character than his predecessor Balfour, were determined to vehemently oppose the bill. Bonar-Law, who had grown up in Ulster, was particularly sympathetic to the outlook of the Ulster Unionists, those fighting for Ireland to remain a part of the Britain. Law argued that the liberals had no enthusiasm for the Home Rule Bill, and that it was simply a 'corrupt bargain' between Asquith and Redmond, introduced only to retain Irish votes and prop up the government. Although the bill easily passed through the House of Commons, it was severely rejected by the House of Lords, as predicted. ...read more.


However, historians such as Graham Dangerfield see Carson as constitutionalists who was shrink from open insurrection. His profession of a lawyer suggests that he would have acted politically and legally, without violence. The same cannot be said for James Craig, however, who was single mind, obstinate and determined at all costs to resist the bill, using ANY means possible, and ultimately, armed resistance. Initially, resistance took the form of demonstrations and meetings. Both leaders were present when 100,000 people marched through Balmoral, two days prior to Asquith's introduction of the bill to the House of Commons. This displayed the solidarity of Protestant Ulster, and soon after 'Covenant Day' was announced as an official holiday. It was marked by more parades, demonstrations and signings of 'The Solemn League and covenent' which was signed by a quarter of a million men, some of which supposedly signed in their own blood, a small reflection of what was to follow. Although the Ulster volunteer force was certainly an illegal operation (by this time they had drilled and trained volunteer soldiers), they felt justified ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. "Why were Ulster Unionists so determined to resist home rule for Ireland in the ...

    was lead by the leader of the Uniost Party, James Craig, and the the leader of the Ulster Unionist Council, Edward Carson. They needed to put pressure on the third home rule bill as the bill could not be rejected three times in the House of Lords, and therefore would

  2. Parnell and the Irish Question Why did Gladstone fail to pacify Ireland?

    When Gladstone's support for Home Rule was publicly announced a Liberal resolution on Home Rule was put to the Commons. The resolution passed, Parliament was dissolved and Gladstone thus set up his 3rd ministry with the aim of achieving Home Rule.

  1. I will explain how Carson, Craig and the Ulster Unionists were opposed to the ...

    The signatories were signed in one's own blood as they pledged to stand by one and another defending the position of equal citizenship in the United Kingdom and using any means to defeat the conspiracy of the Home Rule parliament in Ireland.

  2. "In the years 1865-1868 the Fenians did not pose a serious threat to British ...

    This clearly indicates that many of the middle classes did not take any interest in the Fenian uprising. Extract D is from a speech in the House of Commons by the Earl of Mayo, the Conservative Chief Secretary for Ireland 10 March 1868.

  1. Ireland coursework-Part AIreland has had a lot of trouble over the years for many ...

    The McCartney's disagreed with this and urged people to go to the police. He also said, "I want to make it absolutely clear that no one involved acted as a republican or on behalf of republicans."

  2. Why Did Home Rule Divide The Liberal Party So Decisively?

    These breakaway Liberals became known as the Liberal Unionists and sided with the unionist Conservatives in protest of Home Rule.

  1. What where the main features of Liberal Policies towards Ireland between 1906-1914.

    Charles Parnell, was a Protestant landowner who to some extent was a paradox. He possessed the characteristics of a man whom the Irish where being instructed to fight against. Parnell was keen on endorsing a '2 line strategy', In Ireland he encouraged a campaign of 'rent-strikes' amongst tenants', whilst in England, he insisted Irish Mps 'frustrate and agitate' parliamentary business.

  2. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    They've even used the word Socialist. It was only the officials who used the word Marxist. And when they used the word Socialist, it was a particular Irish variant of Socialism because it was defending the working class. In fact, it was so much verbiage, the Provisionals, just as much

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work