• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the treaty of versailles provoke widespread hostility among Germans?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"WHY DID THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES PROVOKE WIDESPREAD HOSTILITY AMONG GERMANS? Following the end of the war and the signing of the Treaty of Versailles on the 28th June 1919 the German people reacted badly. Although, it is important to note that the widespread hostility among Germans had also preceded the signing of the treaty. A reason for this hostility, as A.J. Nicholls points out, was that the Germans had always been told they were fighting a defensive war and therefore did not regard themselves as responsible for the disaster, which had befallen Europe. After the terms of the treaty were accepted this reinforced the belief that the German people had been stabbed in the back as the army were seen as undefeated heroes. The Germans would demand for the terms to be modified. As J.W. Hiden stated in his book "The Weimar Republic": "The enforced signature of the treaty confirmed the worst of existing fears and confirmed the need for a more long-term and cautious running campaign to modify the peace terms." In this essay it is necessary to examine the mean reasons why the Treaty of Versailles did provoke such widespread hostility among Germans. ...read more.

Middle

Hiden argues, Germany's exclusion from the League of Nations underlined the arguments of German nationalists against the Diktat of Versailles. This disillusionment made it easier for Germans to accept the false notion propagated by right wing and nationalist circles that such an "unjust" peace need never have been signed in the first place. The Germans were also angry as they had been denied the rights of self determination that had been granted to other nations. This frustrated many Germans and as Alan Sharp points out in "Versailles 1919: 'A tragedy of Dissapointment' many Germans asked:" Why were the Germans of Austria, the Sudetenland, the Polish corridor and Danzig, even of Alsace-Lorraine and Schelswig, denied the rights of self-determination?" This was an important reason why the Germans found the treaty unjust and felt their enemies had great advantages over them. The Treaty of Versailles was devastating to German national security and thus was another reason why the treaty provoked widespread hostility within Germany. The treaty demilitarised the Rhineland, reduced the German navy and army to 15,000 sea men and 100,000 soldiers. The Germans were also to possess no air force, secret service, tanks or submarines. ...read more.

Conclusion

As A.J. Nicholls argued certainly no atmosphere of peace descended on Germany with the signing of the treaty; if anything hostility to the victor powers became more marked, and was reinforced by hatred for those at home regarded as tools of the enemy. The Germans felt the treaty was a Diktat, they felt very bitter about the loss of people and territory, angry about the denied rights of self-determination, humiliated by their reduced military powers, resented the reparations and did not accept that they were solely responsible for the war. The harshness of the treaty was such that widespread hostility in Germany hardened in many people into a solemn resolve to see the terms of the treaty overturned and to see Germany revenged for her treatment at the hands of the Allies by a future, successful, war. As stated by Alan Sharp: "The settlement neither crippled Germany nor reconciled her to the new order; instead it left her with grievances and the latent potential to make trouble." Only a great victory would satisfy the hostile and angered Germans, who thus, after economic collapse in 1929, and the failure of the Weimar republic, began to support the ideas of Hitler and the Nazis. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

The student constantly links their answer to the question set which is very impressive at GCSE level and they support their argument well throughout. I would argue that the essay, at times, lacked some fluency in it as it jumped ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The student constantly links their answer to the question set which is very impressive at GCSE level and they support their argument well throughout. I would argue that the essay, at times, lacked some fluency in it as it jumped around a bit from one point to another, but this is almost unavoidable in many cases. Such that there were places where the student stated, gave evidence and then just left it hanging. It was obvious it linked to the question, but perhaps it was not linked well enough to the next point that they were about to make. The best way to help such problems is thorough planning along with plentiful proof reading. However, I do not feel that this minor flaw would affect the student's mark greatly.

Level of analysis

The student's analytical skills are very high in this essay. They showed a clear understanding of the title of the essay through their analysis of the evidence that they gave to back up their argument. However, they lacked the step to conclude their own argument in each paragraph coherently. They like to state historians view which agree with a statement they had made earlier, but they fail to make it explicit that that is the line of argument that are taking. Sometimes, stating the obvious can be beneficial as long as it is not overdone - getting the balance right comes with practise. Their judgements brought them to an appropriate conclusion, which came by no surprises. This is good as the examiner should not find their conclusion a surprise and paragraphs should naturally lead onto their concluding point.

Quality of writing

The spelling, grammar and punctuation are fine and the appropriate technical terms were used. One major flaw in this essay is the absence of referencing where the quotes came from! This could count as plagiarism and so students must be careful. The student follows the typical suggested way of essay writing for GCSE level (introduction, selection of points to argue for and against and conclusion). Their work was clear to follow which helps the examiner identify the marks to award very quickly.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by crystalclearmagic 23/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the Germans hate the treaty of Versailles?

    5 star(s)

    The German people suffered great economic hardship because of the treaty. There are many reasons why that happened and one of the reasons is the treaty gave the French and Belgians the right to take reparations by force. When Ebert agreed to the treaty, Germany was forced to pay reparations,

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    to his great dislike for the Communists who were provoking revolution in cities throughout Germany. In this assignment, Hitler was given the task of keeping a close watch on individual groups, which could have been a threat to the military of the Weimar Government.

  1. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    German states, Italian states and Poland. They were controlled by other countries. They started revolutions to fight against the foreign countries. * In 1839, the London Treaty was signed. The powers recognized independence, and guaranteed permanent neutral status of Belgium. * Revolution In France in 1848 * a.

  2. Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of WWI

    Germany announced the policy of 'unrestricted submarine warfare' in February 1915, which involved destroying ships belonging to or helping the Allies. Neutral trading ships, therefore, were destroyed as well as warships. In the ensuing months, Germany's tactics were seen as a breech of international law.

  1. The Treaty of Versailles created more problems than it solved. Discuss.

    However the French could not see that by hamstringing the German economy, the whole of the European economy would be wrecked. The British economist John Maynard Keynes went so far as to say that no reparations should be made by Germany as they were that vital to Europe's economy; "The

  2. Did the successes of the Vienna settlement ou tweigh its failures?

    It may well be the case that had nationalistic feelings been allowed fuller expression in the settlement, the emergence of an aggressive, expansionist nationalistic feeling would have been inevitable. This would have led to far more unrest in Europe than was in fact the case.

  1. Summary of the Situation of Europe in the 1900s

    Before WWI, Great Britain set reform in the popular interest of the people. The government was very stable and strong. However they needed an ally to break out of their isolation. Britain had many dispute over colonies in France however.

  2. To what extent was Hitler to blame for WW2?

    Hitler's new confidence that he would not be challenged if he invaded Poland had been increased by the German air force's performance in the Spanish Civil War in 1937, in which he proved to the world that Germany had a powerful military.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work