• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the treaty of versailles provoke widespread hostility among Germans?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"WHY DID THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES PROVOKE WIDESPREAD HOSTILITY AMONG GERMANS? Following the end of the war and the signing of the Treaty of Versailles on the 28th June 1919 the German people reacted badly. Although, it is important to note that the widespread hostility among Germans had also preceded the signing of the treaty. A reason for this hostility, as A.J. Nicholls points out, was that the Germans had always been told they were fighting a defensive war and therefore did not regard themselves as responsible for the disaster, which had befallen Europe. After the terms of the treaty were accepted this reinforced the belief that the German people had been stabbed in the back as the army were seen as undefeated heroes. The Germans would demand for the terms to be modified. As J.W. Hiden stated in his book "The Weimar Republic": "The enforced signature of the treaty confirmed the worst of existing fears and confirmed the need for a more long-term and cautious running campaign to modify the peace terms." In this essay it is necessary to examine the mean reasons why the Treaty of Versailles did provoke such widespread hostility among Germans. ...read more.

Middle

Hiden argues, Germany's exclusion from the League of Nations underlined the arguments of German nationalists against the Diktat of Versailles. This disillusionment made it easier for Germans to accept the false notion propagated by right wing and nationalist circles that such an "unjust" peace need never have been signed in the first place. The Germans were also angry as they had been denied the rights of self determination that had been granted to other nations. This frustrated many Germans and as Alan Sharp points out in "Versailles 1919: 'A tragedy of Dissapointment' many Germans asked:" Why were the Germans of Austria, the Sudetenland, the Polish corridor and Danzig, even of Alsace-Lorraine and Schelswig, denied the rights of self-determination?" This was an important reason why the Germans found the treaty unjust and felt their enemies had great advantages over them. The Treaty of Versailles was devastating to German national security and thus was another reason why the treaty provoked widespread hostility within Germany. The treaty demilitarised the Rhineland, reduced the German navy and army to 15,000 sea men and 100,000 soldiers. The Germans were also to possess no air force, secret service, tanks or submarines. ...read more.

Conclusion

As A.J. Nicholls argued certainly no atmosphere of peace descended on Germany with the signing of the treaty; if anything hostility to the victor powers became more marked, and was reinforced by hatred for those at home regarded as tools of the enemy. The Germans felt the treaty was a Diktat, they felt very bitter about the loss of people and territory, angry about the denied rights of self-determination, humiliated by their reduced military powers, resented the reparations and did not accept that they were solely responsible for the war. The harshness of the treaty was such that widespread hostility in Germany hardened in many people into a solemn resolve to see the terms of the treaty overturned and to see Germany revenged for her treatment at the hands of the Allies by a future, successful, war. As stated by Alan Sharp: "The settlement neither crippled Germany nor reconciled her to the new order; instead it left her with grievances and the latent potential to make trouble." Only a great victory would satisfy the hostile and angered Germans, who thus, after economic collapse in 1929, and the failure of the Weimar republic, began to support the ideas of Hitler and the Nazis. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

The student constantly links their answer to the question set which is very impressive at GCSE level and they support their argument well throughout. I would argue that the essay, at times, lacked some fluency in it as it jumped ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The student constantly links their answer to the question set which is very impressive at GCSE level and they support their argument well throughout. I would argue that the essay, at times, lacked some fluency in it as it jumped around a bit from one point to another, but this is almost unavoidable in many cases. Such that there were places where the student stated, gave evidence and then just left it hanging. It was obvious it linked to the question, but perhaps it was not linked well enough to the next point that they were about to make. The best way to help such problems is thorough planning along with plentiful proof reading. However, I do not feel that this minor flaw would affect the student's mark greatly.

Level of analysis

The student's analytical skills are very high in this essay. They showed a clear understanding of the title of the essay through their analysis of the evidence that they gave to back up their argument. However, they lacked the step to conclude their own argument in each paragraph coherently. They like to state historians view which agree with a statement they had made earlier, but they fail to make it explicit that that is the line of argument that are taking. Sometimes, stating the obvious can be beneficial as long as it is not overdone - getting the balance right comes with practise. Their judgements brought them to an appropriate conclusion, which came by no surprises. This is good as the examiner should not find their conclusion a surprise and paragraphs should naturally lead onto their concluding point.

Quality of writing

The spelling, grammar and punctuation are fine and the appropriate technical terms were used. One major flaw in this essay is the absence of referencing where the quotes came from! This could count as plagiarism and so students must be careful. The student follows the typical suggested way of essay writing for GCSE level (introduction, selection of points to argue for and against and conclusion). Their work was clear to follow which helps the examiner identify the marks to award very quickly.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by crystalclearmagic 23/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the Germans hate the treaty of Versailles?

    5 star(s)

    Germany lost 12.5 per cent of its population and 10 per cent of its land (which Includes 16 per cent of its coal and 48 per cent of its iron industry. The economic chaos of 1923 was a result of the treaty's terms.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was The Treaty Of Versailles Justified?

    5 star(s)

    to Lloyd George saying, "You know that God Himself had only 10!" Another British delegate General Henry Wilson referred to President Wilson as a, "vain, ignorant, weak ass." The League of Nations was created, but perhaps because most of Wilson's other points were ignored, the United States did not join.

  1. To what extent was Hitler to blame for WW2?

    This provided Hitler with the capability as well as the motivation provided by other themes to invade Poland, then France and finally the USSR. The influence that alliances had on the decisions of different nations also contributed towards World War II.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    The War had been a blessing to the young Hitler, who had been unsuccessful in civilian life. When Germany was defeated, Hitler was devastated. He wrote, "I could sit there no longer, once again, everything went black before my eyes, and I tottered and groped my way back to the

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    to mention is lack of ability to produce coal in Germany due to the occupation of the land to produce coal by France. Brockdorff doubts that the Allied Powers will even consider the economic consequences of the peace and "those who sign the Treaty will sign the death sentence of millions of German men, women and children."

  2. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    The League did have many failures at a political level such as her involvement in Abyssinia, however there were other successes of the League. One brief example is the dispute which was settled by the League over the Aaland Islands in 1921.

  1. Causes of World War 2

    After a meeting which excluded Germany, even though Germany was the subject, these four leaders of the time decided to go along with Frances requests to severely damage Germany's reputation, power, colonies, financial debuts and military forces. In the end the main terms stated by the treaty were: 1.

  2. World War 1 - How Two Bullets Caused 20 Million Deaths

    The attempts by them to acquired influence abroad led to conflicts between the major powers and the new comers. The defensive treaties made were an attempt by each nation to hold on to their foreign areas. Again Germany wanted more so they decided to take over Britain?s African empire and this really annoyed the British.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work