Why did the Tsar abdicate following the 1905 revolution and not the 1905 .

Authors Avatar
Matthew Goodwin 10MA history Essay planning sheet Essay question; why did the Tsar abdicate following the 1905 revolution and not the 1905 . ThemeSupporting points/documents/page referencesTrusting the TsarIn 1905 people were still loyal to the tsar as they accepted his promises of reform .The tsar did not carry out these reforms in 1905 because the revolution did not stop and as the tsar did not give them what they wanted then they thought that they could no longer trust him. In 1917 on top of them no longer trusting him because of him not doing the promised reforms there had been various other situations where the people thought that they could no longer trust him.Scale and scope of the 2 revolutions In 1905 the tsar divided his enemies up so that the protests were disorganised and  lacked money . In 1917 the march was on a much larger scale more political and more organised ,at the brunt of it were the bolsheviks and this party wanted to overthrow the tsar and take charge themselves .This along with the mutiny of other troops this was a recipe for
Join now!
disaster.The two wars (with Japan and WW1)In the 1905 war with Japan was not going well but there eventually was a stalemate from this came the treaty of Washington and Russia got a very good deal from this . So even though the war was not exactly how Russia wanted to end it and they got a lot of what they wanted so this made the people less angry. In 1917 Russia was faced with a world war the casualties were much higher and by 1917 Russia losses totalled 1,300,000.This obviously was not what the people wanted and this meant ...

This is a preview of the whole essay