• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Tsar abdicate in March, 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the Tsar abdicate in March, 1917? Tsar Nicholas II was an autocrat who had complete power of the Russian state. Russia had over 16 nationalities and very poor lines of communication; roads were mud tracks and there was only one railway line. The Tsar being an autocratic leader, meaning he had to rule the whole of Russia alone, the geographic and industrial state of Russia made it a very difficult country to rule. The Tsar was greatly respected by his people and he had total control. Although respected, things changed for the Tsar in 1917. Many events that took place while he was the Tsar explain the reasons for his abdication in March, 1917, the reasons for which the Tsar was finally overthrown. Workers within Russia were treated to terrible conditions in both residence and work within factories. They were forced to live in overcrowded barracks, often having to assign shifts to beds due to lack of space. ...read more.


This could have been an eye opener for some peasants and workers as Marx believed that a society in which proletariats rule should be developed. The ideology of an equal state would have appealed to the peasants and workers who had enough of the aristocracy within Russia and wanted to be treated equally. Marxism conflicted with the ideas of religion whereas the Tsar was supposedly the 'man of God'. Due to the spread of Marxism, revolutions began to take place that adopted those beliefs - so the abdication of the Tsar was eventually inevitable. Besides that, workers and peasants were getting fed up of being treated badly by the aristocrats. The Tsar himself could have possibly been the reason for his own abdication. He left Russia to lead the army on the frontline with hope to improve the techniques of the war front. However, this was not the best decision to take as any defeats would have been blamed on the Tsar. ...read more.


The March 1917 Revolution was the trigger cause of the abdication because by this point, the population of Russia had enough and turned to the Bolsheviks for support. I think the long term causes of the abdication were the situation before the war, the economic, political and social causes. Industry and agriculture was terrible, conditions of the working class were appalling and the Tsar had promised free speech through the Duma whereas the Duma proved to be useless. The Tsar himself was said not to be ready to become a ruler, which was possibly true as he did not do a very good job of it. He had hired the Okhrana (secret police) to ensure everything worked out to his advantage. From the information, I have formed the opinion that the Tsar did not really do much to gain the support of his people, nor did he improve the situation of Russia, which made him extremely unpopular. This reason went hand in hand with the various weak decisions of the Tsar to lead only to his abdication. ?? ?? ?? ?? Gul-e-Raana Afzal 12t1 History - Mr Gillespie. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    We have been made beggars, we are oppressed; we are near to death..." On Sunday 22 January, about 200,000 people marched towards the Winter Palace to deliver the petition. As the marchers approached the palace, they were met by troops who, in confusion, shot them down without a second thought.

  2. The Factors which Lead to the Abdication of Tsar Nicholas in March 1917

    The army also took farm horses, which meant it was nearly impossible to farm the land effectively. These factors infuriated this social class who blamed the tsar for the situation. Just as peasant conditions looked like they were improving with Stolypin Land Reforms, the war started and everything was put on hold.

  1. Why was the Tsar Forced to Abdicate in 1917?

    There were strikes, protests, and eventually it all came to a head. On Sunday, 22 January 1905 a crowd of 200,000 marched to the Winter Palace to give a petition to the Tsar. Marchers carried pictures of the Tsar out of respect, but their leader had already fled at the first sign of trouble.

  2. Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    The peasants had not moved on significantly enough for them not to lose faith in the tsarist regime. Famines still afflicted whole regions, weather played havoc on the best of farms, and grain output rose only 2% per annum, while the population in Russia ballooned, tripling in two decades.

  1. Russian Revolution in March 1917.

    Farms in the countryside were also lacking man due to conscription for the war. The revolutionary upheavals of 1905 affected people of all classes, but factory workers in particular began strikes, demonstrations and street battles.

  2. Why did the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    They all united as one, which meant the Tsar was in big trouble by this time as they had all turned against him. The workers, who were already against the tsar for grievances such as their working and living conditions, went on strike and by February 1917 around 300,000 workers were on strike.

  1. Why did Tzar Nicholas II abdicate in 1917 and not in 1905?

    However these changes were not enough therefore over 150,000 people signed a petition and on 22nd January, 1905, the priest led a large procession of workers to the Winter Palace in order to present the petition to Tzar Nicholas II.

  2. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    of Bolshevik propaganda he said ?The situation is critical in the extreme. In fact, it is now absolutely clear that to delay the uprising would be fatal?. Conclusively, Lenin was confident in his preparations to position the Bolsheviks at their optimum condition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work