• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the tsar fall from power in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the tsar fall from power in 1917? On March 2nd 1917 the Tsar agreed to abdicate, this was the accumulation of a series of factors associated with the Tsarist Russian society. All workers, middle classes, aristocrats and even some of the Tsars oldest and most faithful supporters were starting to resent the system they were under. Famines, inflation, strikes and incisive rumors all took their toll on the populace. The icing on the cake came in the form of the extremist feelings of anger the army felt towards Nicholas I, and their withdrawal of support for him. Here are some of the events that led up to the 1917 revolution in more detail. In August 1915, the Tsar left Petrograd to command the Russian army. He therefore received the blame personally for all their defeats and lost control of his troops as he left Rasputin and the Tsarina to rule Russia. His army also consisted of millions of poor, starving peasants with bad equipment, poor supplies of rifles and ammunition. In 1916, two million soldiers were killed or seriously wounded, and one third of a million taken prisoner and the civilian population were horrified. ...read more.

Middle

They dismissed able ministers, replacing them with hopeless ones and wild rumours began to spread about Tsarina and Rasputin being lovers. The situation was on the verge of breaking point and had almost spelt the end of the Tsarist regime.The tsar might also have come across as a traitor for cavorting with the enemy. Anyone who is thought to have betrayed their own country is not exactly going to be wanted to rule. The Russian economy was also a problem that helped contribute to the Russian revolution. Nearly 90% of people were peasants and most were poverty stricken. They worked with the most basic tools. Half the farming land belonged to 300,000 landowners but the other half was shared with 15 million peasant families. This outraged the people and the economy was in tatters. Industry was also a big failure, there were large numbers of poor landless peasants who worked long hours with low wages and lived in appalling slums. The Tsar did not seem to have any concern for them and seemed to focus on the higher-class people. ...read more.

Conclusion

Consequently, when these people were being recruited to fight in the war, the unemployment rate in the cities increased and factories were desperate for workers. Wages got lower and lower so the factory owners could afford to employ them and more and more strikes broke out. In December 1916, workers in Petrograd starved due to lack of workers - Russia was in chaos. Not only the soldiers but also the civilian population became angry. The Tsar's fall from power was due to his poor leadership and control of his country. He made many vital mistakes when ruling his country and everyone lost trust in him and stopped supporting him. Strikes had risen to epidemic proportions. Discontented with the war, meager pay and criminal working conditions, and with no Cossacks to stop them this time, Russia began to implode. This is not a picture of fragmented incidents, but a series of closely intertwined factors. All this could have been put to a halt by a competent leader. That was why the tsar abdicated he had lost absolutely everyone's support even the Duma the generals and some of his most loyal supporters. Lorraine Phillips 10H.1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    It shows that 100 men were mutinying against the Tsar, but we cannot say what the rest of the army's attitude to the Tsar is. We know that there was a civil war in Russia from 1918-1921, which was only a year after this photo was taken.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    Source H explains "that a terrible crisis is on the way", which also suggests the detrimental impact of war on Tsarism which in turn supports Kokovstov's idea. At this time in Russia there was great hostility and opposition towards the Tsarist government because of the burden of war and pitiable conditions of everyday life.

  1. Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    them we can only wonder, by thought of virtual history what life would have been like. For, if we are to believe the liberals, life would have definitely been different, the Revisionists- maybe, and according to the Soviets, inevitably. The war also placed great strains on Russia's political system, however

  2. Why did the Tsar abdicate after the 1917 revolution

    He did not directly order it but all the people thought he did. Also in 1905 he made a decision that saved him but which also condemned him in 1917. This was the October Manifesto. This gave the protestors what they wanted and peace was restored.

  1. What triggered the Tsars fall?

    The soldiers were also very poorly equipped, often lacking guns and ammunition. To cut a long story short, criminal ineptitude and lack of collaboration in the higher command resulted in slackness and poor leadership. The effects of the war on the Russians at home were dire.

  2. The Fall of the Tsar

    I don't think either of these sources disproves sources A and B, because neither is particularly reliable. While both the texts were from a history textbook, and both actually written by the authors well after Tsar Nicholas II's reign, both sources C and D are from the actual period.

  1. No other figure in recent Russian history has received the amount of vilification and ...

    Nicholas II was barely twenty-six years old at the time of his accession. During his son's golden youth, Alexander III did not allow his son Nicholas much participation in affairs of government. It is likely that Alexander III feared that his eldest son was not intellectually capable of handling the inheritance that was rightfully his.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    (Ibid., p. 201.) The prominent Menshevik Nikolai Sukhanov recalls that "all Russia � was constantly demonstrating in those days. The provinces had all become accustomed to street demonstrations". (Ibid., p. 201.) Nadezhda Krupskaya, Lenin's wife, recalls: "The streets in those days presented a curious spectacle: everywhere people stood about in knots, arguing heatedly and discussing the latest events.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work