• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Tsar survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917 revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Tsar survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917 revolution? Introduction Many different tsars have ruled over Russia since 1547. The tsars were like kings, they had the power to do as they pleased. All the tsars dealt with any problems with an immediate, forceful strike against them. When Tsar Nicholas II came to power he appeared to be a good ruler, he was hard working and loyal to his family. But he also lacked in confidence and love for the job. He confessed he didn't know how to rule a country. During tsar Nicholas II's reign he suffered many embassising events such as the two wars. This lead to the tsar's popularity to decrease. Nicholas II survived the first revelution but not the 1917 revolution for the following reasons. The 1905 revolution was wide spread affecting many people and killing many. There were strikes and riots in the towns and cities all over the country, and peasants turned against the landowners in the countryside. The riots and strikes were mostly from civilians who wanted the tsar to change their living and working conditions; the revolution was sparked of by the events of bloody Sunday. ...read more.

Middle

Another reason why he was unpopular is because of his wife. People thought she was having an affair with Rasputin, they also thought that she 'bullied' the Tsar into doing what ever she wanted. Another of the Tsar's problems was that he had a son with haemophilia meaning that Russia's future Tsar would die at an early age. This all made the Tsar weak and vulnerable to attack by others. By 1917 the Russian people knew their ruler was weak and because of this they wanted a new one. When Germany declared war on Russia on 1st August 1914 everyone expected a short war like the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-5 but as it became clear that the war was going to last a lot longer, the Tsar and his government lost the support of the people. The soldiers lost their loyalty to the Tsar as they were ill supplied and led by poor leaders, these and political developments at home lead to the defeat of the Russian armies in 1917. The First World War was another embarrassing loss to the Russian's and like the earlier war against Japan led to a revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

Conscription means that all men of a certain age had to join the army for a certain time. Because the Russian army lacked equipment and supplies only half the army had rifles, the other half had swords and bombs, these people had to pick up dead men's rifles and use them. On some days of the war soldiers were given only one bullet that had to last them for the day. All these things made the Tsar unpopular meaning he lost the support of his army, this helped lead to his resignation. Whole companys of soildiers would surreder to the Germans, rather than fight and face certain death. Many soldiers would desert, along with their officers and leaders. They would go back to the Russian cities and tell people about the attrocities thay had faced at the battlefront. This lead to even more support for the war to end. In the end the Tsar was forced to surrender to the Germans. He was removed from power and along with his family was murdered by his own ministers. Conclusion I think the main reason that the Tsar resigned was because of the First World War. I think this because the war affected the most people ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How and why did the tsar nicholas II survive the 1905 revolution?

    Sergie Witte created a period known as the great spurt. He modernised communications with the introduction of the Trans-Siberian Railway, constructed in 1891 to 1902. In doing so, it improved export and import (which were taxed) of goods and circulation of ideas within the country.

  2. Why did Nicholas II survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of 1917?

    However, by the 1917 revolution the Tsar no longer had this support from the troops and it was perhaps this key factor more than any other which eventually led to his downfall. The Russian entry into the First World War had led to millions of young men being conscripted into the army rather than choosing it as a lifetime career.

  1. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    They were beaten by not only a belt , but with any other object that the master could find . Amongst them were files and hammers .Others were violently punched or kicked . Safety at this time was not taken into consideration .

  2. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    "We are treated as slaves who must bare their fate and be silent...We ask but little: to reduce the working day to eight hours and to provide a minimum wage of one rouble a day." 1 On January 22nd 1905, 200,000 workers and their families marched up to the Tsar's

  1. The Russian Revolution 1917

    they never had in mind the views or opinions of the people who had overthrown the Tsar, therefore there was no reason why these parties should be happy with rule on the part of the provisional government. The first decision (known as "order number 1")

  2. "Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March ...

    The Russian population was fed up with the Tsar and the way he ruled his country, added to the unrest in the main urban centers, there was also unrest in the countryside. The peasantry went on strike which aggravated the already existing food shortage; peasants overthrew their landlords, as they

  1. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    This unjust and unfair feeling was voiced within the peasantry communities and can be attributed to the need for agitation as agreed by Pipes: 'These differences along with the growing literacy, unaccompanied by proportionately expanding opportunities to apply the knowledge acquired from reading, within the peasant communities probably contributed to the to the restlessness of the lower classes.'

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    But the most striking feature is the sweeping victory of the Bolsheviks, who, from a mere 12 per cent in June were now an absolute majority. What this shows is that the Bolsheviks had the support of the overwhelming majority of the workers, and a sizeable section of the peasants also.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work