• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917? 1. The message of the cartoon is that the workers in Russia support the whole country - and without them Russia would collapse. It also shows that the rest of the Russians are having an easy and comfortable life at the workers expense, and that this is very unfair. The cartoonist gets this message across by showing the workers at the bottom of the pile, which is symbolic of the Russian hierarchy, because they are the least important people. They are seen to be supporting the rest of Russia, almost as if Russia would collapse without the workers, which of course is true, as Russia relied on the working class to sustain industries and work in factories etc. Similarly, the Russian people worked because they needed the small amount of money they earned to survive - in the cartoon, the workers are holding up Russia so that they can survive, and that is the only reason. The workers do not have a choice whether they support Russia (work) or not - they will be crushed if they do not hold it up. The cartoonist further illustrates the unfairness of the Russian hierarchy, as the cartoon depicts the Russian population in a pyramid shape. This shows that the more power, land and authority one has, the higher up the pyramid they will be, but there will be less of those people. The most power is shared by a small amount of people, whereas the least power is shared by a lot of people. The peasants and workers have barely any land, and they certainly have no power or say as to how their country should be run. On the contrary, the Tsar's family and the aristocrats have almost all the power and land, but there are very few of them. The cartoonist shows that the peasants and workers must suffer to sustain the happiness of those higher up. ...read more.

Middle

Source H, was produced after the revolution. We know this as it is an extract from the book 'before the revolution' - it must have been written after the revolution for the author to have known that there was to be a revolution. Because this source is looking back at an event in the past, there is less reason for the author to want to make anything up. Source H was written to be an accurate historical account of what was happening. Source H gives a different view of Rasputin than source G, because source G was trying to affect the opinions of people at the time (in 1916) by showing a distorted view of the relationship between 'the Russian Tsars' and Rasputin. On the other hand, source H is taken from a book written after the revolution and therefore the purpose of the source was to give a historically accurate view of what was actually happening at the time. Because of the differences in the reasons these two sources were produced, these sources give different views on the influence of Rasputin over the Tsar and Tsarina. The second reason why these sources give different views about the influence of Rasputin is because the sources were written with different amounts of information available to them. Source G is a cartoon produced by opposition to the Tsar, and it portrays the Tsar and Tsarina being controlled by Rasputin. He is bigger, and higher up than them, which is trying to show that he has more power than they do. The Tsar and Tsarina look helpless, in a trance, and almost hypnotised. As this cartoon was produced by opposition to the Tsar, there would be no way that they would be able to have had access to any of the Tsar's palaces or mansions, in order for the truth about Rasputin's influence to be discovered. They would not know the truth, so the cartoon would only be speculation. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Tsar was out of touch with his nation, he did not really know what was going on, as source D illustrates, 'He heard of the blood and tears of thousands upon thousands only through official documents...such reports did not convey to him the pain and suffering of the victims'. This was the main reason why so much discontent built up amongst the common people. The poor living and working conditions, the Duma's lack of power the humiliating defeats in the Russo-Japanese war, Bloody Sunday, and the unsuitability of Tsar Nicholas II as a ruler. All these things created a mood of utter discontent amongst Russians. As the Tsar didn't deal with these problems, another built up. The First World War added to the discontent with food shortages and defeats. The army itself felt as if it were fighting to no avail - which increased their discontent and made it more likely for them to mutiny in 1917. The Tsar making himself the leader of the Russian army caused even more bad feelings as every defeat was blamed personally onto the Tsar. Rasputin was left unattended back at home and his influence over the Tsarina was widely publicised by opposition to the Tsar to stir up a bit more discontent. Other propaganda was used to show people the unfairness of the Russian autocratic system (such as source A) and they tried to show people that a better life was not impossible. Finally, the mutiny in sections of the army in 1917 meant that there was no one to deal with the revolution which broke out. All the discontent was expressed and some of the army even joined in. This turned the tide on the Tsarist regime - as there was no one to stop the revolution, their downfall was only a matter of time. Andy Lowe GCSE History Coursework 2004 Page 1 of 11 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    The source tells use how the nurse had seen the Tsars soldiers fire upon the demonstrators. She also comments that now the soldiers had fired upon people 'nothing now could stop the revolution'. I think both sources C and D agree with the evidence portrayed in sources A and B.

  2. Why was the Tsar Forced to Abdicate in 1917?

    There were plans to take food by force, but the government abandoned this idea, afraid it would spark widespread revolts. The people of Russia became starving and desperate. What was even worse was that there was enough food and fuel, it just couldn't be transported into the cities.

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    The St. Petersburg Soviet, lead by Trotsky stopped its strike on October 19 and people went back to work. Signs of the succession of the concessions begun to arouse. Nicholas made sure that his armed forces remained loyal by ending the war with Japan, thus putting an end to the loss of hundreds of peasants' relatives.

  2. The Factors which Lead to the Abdication of Tsar Nicholas in March 1917

    The troops sent in to quell the unrest ended up joining the rioters. There were mutiny's in the navy at Kronstadt and army mutiny's in Petrograd were 150, 000 troops deserted. This is very worrying because it is said among histories that a leader cannot survive if it does not have the support of military.

  1. Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    Russia's economic capitals were never fully recovered and were making meagre progress compared with other countries. Conditions in factories were poor, investment was reliant on grain exports (which were the reason for failure many factories as grain fell short of expected production targets)

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    He was one of the only people Stalin trusted. I wouldn't say this source states Stalin was a complete monster but it leans more towards the monster category. Sources G and H are quite hard to analyse because they are both said by the same person but sort of contradict each other so they are not very reliable sources.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    This will make source F just as reliable as source E without any context because they are both seen as just two different opinions. Another reason of why source E is less reliable is because it was illegal to speak badly of Stalin in Russia in those times.

  2. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    Conclusively, due to Trotsky?s presence amongst the main contributors to the revolution, some can argue that he played a much greater role in the revolution itself than Lenin since if these connections were not established in the first placeand the plan was not developed by Trotsky, the revolution would have never occurred.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work