• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917? 1. The message of the cartoon is that the workers in Russia support the whole country - and without them Russia would collapse. It also shows that the rest of the Russians are having an easy and comfortable life at the workers expense, and that this is very unfair. The cartoonist gets this message across by showing the workers at the bottom of the pile, which is symbolic of the Russian hierarchy, because they are the least important people. They are seen to be supporting the rest of Russia, almost as if Russia would collapse without the workers, which of course is true, as Russia relied on the working class to sustain industries and work in factories etc. Similarly, the Russian people worked because they needed the small amount of money they earned to survive - in the cartoon, the workers are holding up Russia so that they can survive, and that is the only reason. The workers do not have a choice whether they support Russia (work) or not - they will be crushed if they do not hold it up. The cartoonist further illustrates the unfairness of the Russian hierarchy, as the cartoon depicts the Russian population in a pyramid shape. This shows that the more power, land and authority one has, the higher up the pyramid they will be, but there will be less of those people. The most power is shared by a small amount of people, whereas the least power is shared by a lot of people. The peasants and workers have barely any land, and they certainly have no power or say as to how their country should be run. On the contrary, the Tsar's family and the aristocrats have almost all the power and land, but there are very few of them. The cartoonist shows that the peasants and workers must suffer to sustain the happiness of those higher up. ...read more.

Middle

Source H, was produced after the revolution. We know this as it is an extract from the book 'before the revolution' - it must have been written after the revolution for the author to have known that there was to be a revolution. Because this source is looking back at an event in the past, there is less reason for the author to want to make anything up. Source H was written to be an accurate historical account of what was happening. Source H gives a different view of Rasputin than source G, because source G was trying to affect the opinions of people at the time (in 1916) by showing a distorted view of the relationship between 'the Russian Tsars' and Rasputin. On the other hand, source H is taken from a book written after the revolution and therefore the purpose of the source was to give a historically accurate view of what was actually happening at the time. Because of the differences in the reasons these two sources were produced, these sources give different views on the influence of Rasputin over the Tsar and Tsarina. The second reason why these sources give different views about the influence of Rasputin is because the sources were written with different amounts of information available to them. Source G is a cartoon produced by opposition to the Tsar, and it portrays the Tsar and Tsarina being controlled by Rasputin. He is bigger, and higher up than them, which is trying to show that he has more power than they do. The Tsar and Tsarina look helpless, in a trance, and almost hypnotised. As this cartoon was produced by opposition to the Tsar, there would be no way that they would be able to have had access to any of the Tsar's palaces or mansions, in order for the truth about Rasputin's influence to be discovered. They would not know the truth, so the cartoon would only be speculation. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Tsar was out of touch with his nation, he did not really know what was going on, as source D illustrates, 'He heard of the blood and tears of thousands upon thousands only through official documents...such reports did not convey to him the pain and suffering of the victims'. This was the main reason why so much discontent built up amongst the common people. The poor living and working conditions, the Duma's lack of power the humiliating defeats in the Russo-Japanese war, Bloody Sunday, and the unsuitability of Tsar Nicholas II as a ruler. All these things created a mood of utter discontent amongst Russians. As the Tsar didn't deal with these problems, another built up. The First World War added to the discontent with food shortages and defeats. The army itself felt as if it were fighting to no avail - which increased their discontent and made it more likely for them to mutiny in 1917. The Tsar making himself the leader of the Russian army caused even more bad feelings as every defeat was blamed personally onto the Tsar. Rasputin was left unattended back at home and his influence over the Tsarina was widely publicised by opposition to the Tsar to stir up a bit more discontent. Other propaganda was used to show people the unfairness of the Russian autocratic system (such as source A) and they tried to show people that a better life was not impossible. Finally, the mutiny in sections of the army in 1917 meant that there was no one to deal with the revolution which broke out. All the discontent was expressed and some of the army even joined in. This turned the tide on the Tsarist regime - as there was no one to stop the revolution, their downfall was only a matter of time. Andy Lowe GCSE History Coursework 2004 Page 1 of 11 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    the capital, which is usually associated with mass demonstrations, which we know about from the figures in Source C. Source D was written before Source B, but they both lead on from each other. Source D tells us of how she thought revolution had become inevitable with the soldiers firing upon the demonstrators.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Source J is practical, it shows the Supreme Soviets as it really was, everyone agreeing with Stalin and claiming that what he believed in was true. However Source I only shows how ridiculous the show trials were, source J goes as far as showing the new constitution after Stalin's show trials were over.

  1. Why was the Tsar Forced to Abdicate in 1917?

    Within three days the striking workers rose to around 250,000. As peasants were fighting, there were less people to help work the land but despite this, food production remained high until 1916, until it became clear that the government could not always be relied upon to pay for the food that was being produced.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    Its steel production just exceeded France's steel production with 5.2%. However, its industrial growth rate was high with an average of 3.5% per annum, second to Germany, which arguably indicates that Russia was succeeding. This supports Kokovstov's optimistic view. It is likely that Tolstoy would disagree and explain that it

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    Using terror and sociology Stalin was achieving his aims. In Source J, Stalin is drawn as judge, jury and executioner in the courtroom. This proved that no matter there plea, they would still be presented guilty and then murdered. In an interpretation of Source I you would be led to

  2. Stalin man or monster

    were caused under his control, this may be his way of trying to win back public support. This indicates that Stalin may simply have written this in order to gain support, and turn them against other leaders. Stalin had previously used many methods of bribery, threats and censorship of media,

  1. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    Russia suffered its worst famine of the nineteenth century, costing 1.5 - 2 million lives as well as brutally exposing the shortcomings of government policy. The catastrophe of the famine cost Vyshnegradsky his job and he was replaced by Sergei Witte in 1892.

  2. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    Despite the fact that only 10 of them agreed, plotting went ahead. Undoubtedly, Lenin was conscientious of what the government was doing, In continuation, due to this thorough preparation he ensured that the revolution occurred as on the night of the 24th, after the government shut down the main source

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work