• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did The Tzar Survive The 1905 Revolution And Not That of February 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why Did The Tzar Survive The 1905 Revolution And Not That of February 1917? In 1905 the Tzar was Nicholas II, an absolute ruler with no parliament. He had advisers but they had no power. All political parties opposing the Tzar were illegal. However, opposition to the Tzar was growing in the country. Two major events led to the revolution of 1905. Firstly, in 1904, Japan invaded Manchuria to expand its empire. Russia assumed that Japan would be easily defeated. To their horror Japan was a much greater enemy than they thought and Russia lost the war. This was very embarrassing especially for the Tzar who had used this war to distract the Russian public from the problems at home. The defeat convinced the people of the need for change as the Tzar was taking the country to ruin. Secondly, within a month of defeat, protestors gathered in the capital on 22nd January 1905. Led by father Gapon their aim was to march to the winter palace and present the Tzar with a petition. Neither the protest nor the petition was aimed at overthrowing the Tzar. It was merely to tell the Tzar about that the people were starving and how, for many it was better to die than live. ...read more.

Middle

The transport system was so poor that food meant for the army rotted in sidings instead of feeding the frontline. This meant that the soldiers in the retreating frontline were becoming more miserable because they were getting no food. Soldiers began to desert and lost loyalty to the Tzar. Industry was used to manufacture equipment for the army so there was nothing for the peasants to buy with the money they got from selling their crops. Therefore farmers started to grow food for themselves with no surplus because there was no point. In March 1917 severe strikes in the Petrograd factories caused industry to come to a halt. Good weather encouraged protesters onto the streets and the soldiers were ordered to fire upon the demonstrators. Many soldiers were peasants and were starving in similar conditions and held the same beliefs as the protesters. By the 12th the army supported the riots and many government buildings were ransacked in Petrograd. This revolution was far more successful than in 1905. In 1905 the Tzar had something to fall back on. The Russian public had no idea of his thoughts. They had nothing in the past to base it on. When he created a democratic parliament he pleased the masses. ...read more.

Conclusion

They decided Nicholas II was the last Tzar to rule. In this essay you can see that the Tzar was put in an impossible position. This does not mean that the Tzar was not to blame, he made many mistakes. Leaving his wife to run the country was a bad idea. Firstly the Tzarina was German and Russia was at war with Germany. Also she was under Rasputin's influence who she thought was a miracle worker because she thought he cured her son of haemophilia. The government was run under Rasputin's influence which enraged the country further. The Tzar couldn't help this dilemma because he went to control the army directly. Now if there was any problem with the army the Tzar had no-one else to blame but himself. Then he tried to dissolve the Duma which was the only thing that people still partly respected him for and when he tried to dissolve it all the middle classes that were undecided on the revolution joined it. He put himself in an impossible position after the 1905 revolution. The repression was meant to teach the country a lesson in 1905 but unfortunately for the Tzar this made the protesters determined to win. The Tzar made major political mistakes in the aftermath of the 1905 revolution, leading up to and continuing into 1917. This, combined with the quality leadership of the 1917 revolution ensured its success instead of 1905's failure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    The Tsar's armies were away fighting Germany on the western borders leaving no or little methods of control within the towns and cities. Source A, although slightly bent from the truth gives us a brief idea of what had irrupted in Petrograd.

  2. What Were The Causes Of The 1905 Russian Revolution? How Successful Was This Revolution?

    Due to the lack of communication around Russia, it made industry backward. The communication was none existent, as there weren't many roads or railways. Factory development was very slow, compared to western countries like us. Agriculture was difficult then too, as the land was very weak and was virtually unproductive for farming.

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    He thought that peasants would want to improve their own land and use modern methods to produce more food. He also wanted this to create a new class of prosperous landowning peasant-kulaks-who would be loyal to the government and not wanting changes.

  2. What were the causes of the february revolution

    Nearly a third of the soldiers would go into battle without rifles, they were told to pick up the dead mans rifle in front of you or they would have to use farming tools. The army also didn't have basic supplies such as food, medical supplies and boots.

  1. The Russian Revolution 1917

    Also, if it were not for Lenin, there would have been no Bolshevik party to make such decisions, and, at any rate, there is significant evidence to suggest that Lenin was behind a great deal of these decisions himself. Also, it is a clear weakness of other parties that they

  2. Why did Nicholas II survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of 1917?

    However, by the 1917 revolution the Tsar no longer had this support from the troops and it was perhaps this key factor more than any other which eventually led to his downfall. The Russian entry into the First World War had led to millions of young men being conscripted into the army rather than choosing it as a lifetime career.

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    The cost of living, demand of food, lack of man power, fuel; was all increased drastically. All was made even worse by the increase of the urban population during the war years. There were more factory strikes, and trade unions were banned.

  2. To what extent was the February 1917 Russian revolution inevitable after the 1905 revolution?

    This event was the trigger for the 1905 Revolution and can be interpreted as the trigger for the fall of the Tsardom. The 1905 Revolution gave birth to many of the ideas of the February 1917 revolution, for the first time the people had genuinely challenged the autocracy and had

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work