• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917? Nikita Turkin ATL "The immediate cause of the Revolution of 1917... [was]... the collapse of Russia's fragile political structure under the strains of a war of attrition." (Pipes) While war may have been the trigger which brought the feelings of a nation to a head in St. Petersburg, and finally started that a revolution in the bread queue, "the reasons for this comprehensive collapse of the structures of the old regime were, however, rooted deeply in the history of the Russian sate." (Waldron) Liberals, have said that social unrest and mass disturbance were direct products of war, the truth lies closer with the Revisionists, who, while not over exaggerating the role of either revolutionary parties or over- simplifying the 'people's wishes' like the Soviets, stipulate that February was a culmination of socio- economic preconditions and political precipitants. Even if we discard the Soviet Marxist viewpoint that the recurring trade cycle in the world of economics changes completely the political systems and social hierarchies of countries, it is valid to say that economics plays a part in a country's affairs. ...read more.

Middle

Social unrest and political unhappiness would cause it to peacefully crumble. "The economic demands of this first 'total war' placed stresses beyond even those predicted by Durnovo on Russian society." (Waldron) Peasants, workers and even the generally loyal soldiers, by 1917, felt isolated and unhappy with the economic situation in Russia. Their expression in the form of rural disturbances, mass strikes and mutinies and desertions were all showing the Tsar the flavour of the crowds outside of the Winter Palace. These were premonitions for the 23rd February, and a representation of the people's mood. B. Williams said that "there was no doubt that the initiators of the revolution were the workers and the reserve troops in the capital", but it was the passive capacity of the "very unsettling element" (Pipes) - the peasantry which was a permanent threat to the status quo and an obstacle to overcome if the Tsar wanted to keep his throne. Tax and the conscription of sons, ensured that a feeling of hate was built up in the countryside, so that when Tsarism came to fall millions of peasants were happy to see it go. ...read more.

Conclusion

"By the time war broke out, almost every section of Russian society felt betrayed by the autocracy. The peasantry, the working people, and the growing middle class all felt that the political structures of the empire had failed to satisfy their needs" (Waldron). Combine this with the negative effects of the economy both over the past two decades and the past four years, the social picture was disturbed. Economic grievances, the fact that no political reforms or freedoms had been received and cultural and social isolation of town, village and trench all culminated in the fact that "by 1917 the Russian people had no will to support neither the person of monarch, nor the system which he represented." (Waldron) Marx's dictum came true- there developed such a disparity between political form and socio- economic content, that the only viable prospect was revolution and the abdication of the Tsar. While war was a slap on the back of tsarist collapse, no war did not mean no revolution. The seeds of downfall had been germinating for decades, always fed nutritiously with economic failures, social misunderstandings, military failures, and political stagnancy, watered by tsarist general inadequacy. "A revolution (abdication) was more likely than not" (Pipes) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    These gaps in the industry had a great strain population, prices soared as every day foods became scarcer. This led to demonstrations over the price of bread, described in Source A. Then later the peasants made their other grievances made known, as told in Source B.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    The usefulness of this source is limited because it does not show the entire Russian army, only 100 men are seen. We know that in 1918, some soldiers fought to reinstate the Tsar, so obviously the Tsar was liked by some sections of the army, and therefore the attitude showed

  1. Why was the Tsar Forced to Abdicate in 1917?

    As 1917 dawned, few people had hopes for the survival of the Tsar's regime, and in January strikes broke out all over Russia, and by February they had spread. On International Women's day thousands of people marched and demanded the Government provide bread.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    This situation could be compared with Great Britain, however they had introduced the Defense of the Realm Act which granted the government complete control over the economy and its planning through the Ministry of Munitions. This furthermore hammers down on the point that Tsarism was outdated.

  1. Which of the following views best explain the fall of Tsarism of Russia? ...

    the historian says: "and perhaps not" which suggests that he is not certain that "the most painful stages would have passed". Another source which supports Kokovstov's point is Source 3 which shows statistics comparing Russia's average annual industrial growth rate with that of other nations involved in WW1.

  2. Why did the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    They all united as one, which meant the Tsar was in big trouble by this time as they had all turned against him. The workers, who were already against the tsar for grievances such as their working and living conditions, went on strike and by February 1917 around 300,000 workers were on strike.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    They were the embodiment of workers' self organisation. In every German port, town and barracks, workers', soldiers' and sailors' councils were established and held effective political power. Soviets were established in Bavaria and during the Hungarian Revolution of 1919. In Britain also, Councils of Action were established in 1920, which

  2. To what extent was the Revolution of February/march, in Russia 1917, due to the ...

    The effect of this was to inspire interest and support for revolutionary activity, and as they were a large number of people concentrated in small areas, their potential to become a threatening mob increased. The Tsar struggled with this dilemma of having to modernize to keep up with the rapidly

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work