• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917? Nikita Turkin ATL "The immediate cause of the Revolution of 1917... [was]... the collapse of Russia's fragile political structure under the strains of a war of attrition." (Pipes) While war may have been the trigger which brought the feelings of a nation to a head in St. Petersburg, and finally started that a revolution in the bread queue, "the reasons for this comprehensive collapse of the structures of the old regime were, however, rooted deeply in the history of the Russian sate." (Waldron) Liberals, have said that social unrest and mass disturbance were direct products of war, the truth lies closer with the Revisionists, who, while not over exaggerating the role of either revolutionary parties or over- simplifying the 'people's wishes' like the Soviets, stipulate that February was a culmination of socio- economic preconditions and political precipitants. Even if we discard the Soviet Marxist viewpoint that the recurring trade cycle in the world of economics changes completely the political systems and social hierarchies of countries, it is valid to say that economics plays a part in a country's affairs. ...read more.


Social unrest and political unhappiness would cause it to peacefully crumble. "The economic demands of this first 'total war' placed stresses beyond even those predicted by Durnovo on Russian society." (Waldron) Peasants, workers and even the generally loyal soldiers, by 1917, felt isolated and unhappy with the economic situation in Russia. Their expression in the form of rural disturbances, mass strikes and mutinies and desertions were all showing the Tsar the flavour of the crowds outside of the Winter Palace. These were premonitions for the 23rd February, and a representation of the people's mood. B. Williams said that "there was no doubt that the initiators of the revolution were the workers and the reserve troops in the capital", but it was the passive capacity of the "very unsettling element" (Pipes) - the peasantry which was a permanent threat to the status quo and an obstacle to overcome if the Tsar wanted to keep his throne. Tax and the conscription of sons, ensured that a feeling of hate was built up in the countryside, so that when Tsarism came to fall millions of peasants were happy to see it go. ...read more.


"By the time war broke out, almost every section of Russian society felt betrayed by the autocracy. The peasantry, the working people, and the growing middle class all felt that the political structures of the empire had failed to satisfy their needs" (Waldron). Combine this with the negative effects of the economy both over the past two decades and the past four years, the social picture was disturbed. Economic grievances, the fact that no political reforms or freedoms had been received and cultural and social isolation of town, village and trench all culminated in the fact that "by 1917 the Russian people had no will to support neither the person of monarch, nor the system which he represented." (Waldron) Marx's dictum came true- there developed such a disparity between political form and socio- economic content, that the only viable prospect was revolution and the abdication of the Tsar. While war was a slap on the back of tsarist collapse, no war did not mean no revolution. The seeds of downfall had been germinating for decades, always fed nutritiously with economic failures, social misunderstandings, military failures, and political stagnancy, watered by tsarist general inadequacy. "A revolution (abdication) was more likely than not" (Pipes) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    These gaps in the industry had a great strain population, prices soared as every day foods became scarcer. This led to demonstrations over the price of bread, described in Source A. Then later the peasants made their other grievances made known, as told in Source B.

  2. “Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster” discuss.

    Russia could not be blamed for this. The third and final point that needs to be examined is the statement 'and a human disaster'; Obviously the reason for this comment to be made was the many deaths that have been said to have occurred as a direct result form collectivisation.

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    This is an indication that the Tsar was losing his grip on the Russian people and that a revolution would have been imminent. In conclusion to this section, it is clear that Tsarism was an outdated form of government because of the amount of disorganisation and neglect shown in the war.

  2. Why was Nicholas II able to survive the 1905 revolution but was forced to ...

    lead to nothing but also the Tsar didn't manage to retain his soldier's good opinion, as he was the only man to blame for the defeats. By 1917 the bond between the Tsar and most of Russia had been broken.

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    This source is useful because we know what is being showed in the source was actually happening in 1917, and it shows a crowd of men numerous enough to fill the photo, which would suggest that they were part of a larger crowd.

  2. Why did the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    This would be very hard for the Tsar to control. The Bolsheviks, who were the propaganda, gained support and campaigned against the war. The progressive block also turned against the Tsar who had before been willing to support him. One good thing to come out of that though was the

  1. Why was the Tsar Forced to Abdicate in 1917?

    There were strikes, protests, and eventually it all came to a head. On Sunday, 22 January 1905 a crowd of 200,000 marched to the Winter Palace to give a petition to the Tsar. Marchers carried pictures of the Tsar out of respect, but their leader had already fled at the first sign of trouble.

  2. To what extent was the Revolution of February/march, in Russia 1917, due to the ...

    and all government ministers and army had to answer directly to him. According to Ben Walsh in GCSE Modern World History on page 82, "These Laws agreed to the existence of the duma, but they put so many limitations on its powers that it could do virtually nothing."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work