• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

WHY HAD INTERNATIONAL PEACE COLLAPSED BY 1939?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

KEY QUESTION 3: WHY HAD INTERNATIONAL PEACE COLLAPSED BY 1939? Focus Points 1. What were the long-term consequences of the peace treaties of 1919-23? 2. What were the consequences of the failures of the League in the 1930s? 3. How far was Hitler's foreign policy to blame for the outbreak of war in 1939? 4. Was the policy of appeasement justified? 5. How important was the Nazi-Soviet Pact? 6. Why did Britain and France declare war on Germany in September 1939? Specified Content The collapse of international order in the 1930s; the increasing militarism of Germany, Italy and Japan; Hitler's foreign policy to 1939; the Saar, remilitarization of the Rhineland, Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland; the Nazi-Soviet Pact, appeasement and the outbreak of war in September 1939. Focus Point 1 - What were the long-term consequences of the peace treaties of 1919-23? German Anger In the 1920s the Germans called the Treaty of Versailles the 'Diktat', the 'dictated peace'. They resented: 1 the loss of so much territory, especially the splitting of East Prussia from the rest of Germany. 2 The loss of resources. The treaty took away 74% of their iron ore production and 26% of their coal. 3 Foreign occupation of the Rhineland and Saar 4 Having to accept 'war guilt' and pay reparations. ...read more.

Middle

Clearest example of appeasement, and of how it had failed. See below 1939, Nazi Soviet Pact Surprise agreement between the USSR and Germany not to attack each other. See below. Opened way to invasion of Poland 1939, Invasion of Poland Britain and France declare war on Germany. WWII begins. Focus Point 4 - Was the policy of appeasement justified? What was appeasement? A policy which aimed to prevent aggressors from starting wars by finding out what they really wanted and then agreeing to those demands which seemed reasonable. Followed by Britain and France for most of the 1930s when neither was willing to risk another war with an aggressive power. Britain and appeasement Most politicians thought it was in Britain's interest to avoid becoming entangled in Europe's affairs again. Most British people supported the policy of appeasement. Winston Churchill was one of the few politicians to speak out against it. Arguments For Appeasement 1. The Empire was more important than Europe. The Japanese threatened to attack British colonies in the Far East. Britain could not afford also to fight Germany in the West. 2. British armed forces were not sufficiently large to fight another major war. Britain needed time to rearm. 3. To fight a successful war against Germany, Britain needed the support of the USA and Dominions such as Australia. But they wanted to stay out of European affairs. ...read more.

Conclusion

1. Stalin: a) realised France and Britain were not serious about military talks b) could not face Germany alone c) could not manage to fight in Europe as well as Japan on the Manchurian border d) wanted to take land in Poland 2. Hitler needed a deal. The deadline for invading Poland was close. Neither trusted the other, but it was convenient for the moment. Focus Point 6 - Why did Britain and France declare war on Germany in September 1939? Simply put Britain and France declared war on Germany on 3 September to honour its guarantee to defend Poland, following its invasion by Hitler. Hitler had believed that as before, Britain and France would not got to war over some distant land, but he miscalculated. On a more complex level war is declared because of a number of factors: 1. How the resentment over the Treaty of Versailles led to the beliefs and plans of Hitler that would lead to aggression. 2. How the failure of the League to stop aggression and uphold the treaty encouraged Hitler and others to be more aggressive. And how the weakness of the League encouraged Britain and France to follow an alternative policy in appeasement. 3. How Hitler in particular gradually undid the terms of the treaty in his foreign policy. 4. How Britain and France's policy of appeasement encouraged Hitler to be bolder, how they undermined the League. 5. How others such as Stalin contributed to bringing war closer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Stalin and Hitler: Differences and Similarities

    But both taught children their ideas in school, and outside school. But Hitler concentrated more on children than Stalin did, because under Hitler there were man youth organisations, while under Stalin there weren't any, or just few.

  2. What are the changing attitude of Australians towards war and peace?

    In 1970 more than 200,000 people marched in the streets of Australia's major cities in protest which showed that Australia was strongly against what the government was promoting. The Vietnam War was the first televised war in Australia, the true horrors of war where seen in Australian homes and to public eye.

  1. My main question is : How did Mussolini rise to power in ...

    The PSI was overall, a revisory party but had also a Marxist part. Mussolini ditched with the Marxist and turned his back to revisory socialism. Benito got away to Switzerland because he wanted to avoid his conscription. He went to Switzerland without any idea what to do.

  2. Since the Good Friday Agreement in 1998 there has been a relative period of ...

    The Protestant paramilitary spokesman said the man is nothing to do with them and is just another lunatic. To conclude psychopaths such as Michael Stone have performed inexcusable actions and argued that they are just politics fighting religions. Although in my opinion people such as Michael Stone should be put

  1. Live Simply That Others May Simply Live

    ran against Gandhi's candidate in presidential elections and had won but had been unable to run the congress without the support of Gandhi. Bose resigned and fled to Japan to find support from them and the Nazi's for his plans to liberate India.

  2. Nazi Control and Hitler's Foreign Policy

    of the fuhrer no matter what it will be will be discussed as the only correct one for Germany" Terror was the last form of control used by the Nazi's and it was aimed mostly at those Propaganda and education did not work on.

  1. Causes and consequences of the English Civil War

    The Kingdom will formalize its alliance with the Protestant States of the United Provinces (the Dutch) in order to defend them against the Pope and his followers. 18. The King must clear the five members of the House of Commons, along with Lord Kim Bolton, of any wrongdoing. 19.

  2. Canada: The 1920's and 1930's

    For most Canadians, there was only one method of obtaining money and it was often tiresome, tedious, and grueling but, it was the only way to bring in some form of support for their families. Beyond the physical labour, Canadian men of the thirties were forced to conquer their pride

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work