• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is the Battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

Extracts from this document...


Why is the Battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy? The Battle of the Somme started on July 1st 1916 and lasted until November that year. The battle took place in Somme, France. The Somme was an idea pitched to Sir Douglas Haig by Joseph Joffre the French Commander-in-Chief. Joffre wanted the attack to gain large amounts of territory and destroy German manpower but Haig wanted a large attack to take place in Flanders. Haig accepted Joffre's proposal. The attack was used as a diversion to release the pressure on the French army at Verdun. To come to my conclusion on whether the Somme was a military tragedy or not I will discuss the following: causes of the battle; the events leading up to the battle; the result; and the different opinions. In 1916, the trenches were such a small area crammed with ammunition dumps, hospitals, delousing centres and light railways these were to be the base for millions of men for a further two years. The war was not just on the Western Front; British troops were serving all over the world at this time. Troops in the trench were usually knee high in water and suffered many diseases such as trench foot. ...read more.


David Lloyd George believed that the Somme was only one element that led to pressure being reduced in Verdun and he believed that the Somme was a failure. James Lovegrove, a lieutenant in the British Army, is very critical of Haig. Lovegrove believes that Haig, although he was just doing his job, cared nothing for the casualties. He also believes that the Government cared nothing for the casualties either because Haig was given a lump sum and massive pension after the war, Lovegrove believes that Haig should have never been in charge of men and blames his public schooling. Henry Hamilton Fyfe, a Daily Mail reporter, met Haig on several occasions during the First World War. Fyfe was very disappointed when he first met Haig. Haig, although he looked the part of a soldier, he was shy and afraid of the media. Fyfe believes that Haig should be held responsible for the mass slaughter in the Somme battles and in Flanders, because he sent men to fight against 'positions far too strong to be carried out by assault'. Lieutenant Bernard Montgomery, a soldier in the First World War is very critical of his senior officers. ...read more.


I do not think that the Somme was worth the number of lost lives, but it did contribute to the winning of the war on the Western Front. If the Somme were not fought, would the Germans have won the war? The Somme can be used as an example to show people the consequences of war, to try to ensure that if there is another war that there will be no casualties amounting to that of the Somme. The nature of war is changing all of the time; Haig used his resources to the best of his ability to win the war, that's what he was paid to do. He would not have purposely killed nearly half a million men because he felt like it and the men knew that there was the possibility of dying on the Western Front or on any front when they signed up for the army. To evaluate the war we have to see the big picture, if different decisions had been made would the number of casualties been greater or smaller, we cannot be sure, the only thing that we are sure of is that Haig believed that his plans would win the war and they did, just at a large cost to human life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    This is summed up by Fred Pearson: 'I know what I'd have given him...' Now, I am to discuss whether John Terraines' theory was indeed justified. There does seem to be extensive proof that the generals of the war did deserve more credit, but that does not mean that this claim is any more conclusive.

  2. The Battle of the Somme

    Donkeys are stereotyped to be stubborn and unthinking. The Generals are 'donkeys' for theses reasons:- Firstly, their tactics were often ridiculous and old-fashioned. The order telling the soldiers to walk was unthinking and cost many lives. They were over-confident and thought the order to walk would be fine as they expected all the Germans to be dead.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    J. P Taylor, 1979. Artillery bombardment was also relatively new. It was supposed to blow trenches and cut the barbed wire. The British using their giant howitzers placed ten miles behind their own front lines fired 170 million artillery shells throughout the whole war.

  2. How far was General Douglas Haig Responsible for the Failings of the British war ...

    This is an unacceptable failure of Haig's. Haig has also been widely criticised for "taking the back seat", both during and in between battles. During all but two of these battles, while his men were fighting, Haig could be found miles away, living comfortably.

  1. How did life for a typical soldier serving in a trench on the western ...

    By 1918 more modern tanks could carry up to 10 men and reach a speed of 4mph. Aeroplanes were used in battle for the first time, they delivered bombs to the battle areas. Battles between aeroplanes in the sky became known as 'dogfights'.

  2. Why is the Battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy

    Numerous factors would also appear to have been overlooked by Haig, such as the position of the defenders on high ground, with a good view of any attacking forces. The strength of German defences was also underestimated, seeing as the Germans had been in place since 1914 and had set

  1. How Far was Haig responsible for the failings of the British War effort on ...

    Haig refused to move from the tactics which were successful in earlier wars into more advanced tactics. He considered the machine gun overrated and still believed that grit and determination were the main ways to win, not firepower. He just sent wave after wave of troops over the top to their death despite constant failings.

  2. How far was Haig responsible for the failings of British war effort on the ...

    A critic of Haig, Dr. Laffin, said that Haig saw himself as an instrument of god. General Haig never visited the front line so he did not know what the conditions were like. General Haig is also called a 'Bungler and Butcher' by critics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work