• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is there disagreement about Stalin's effect on the Soviet Union?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework - 8 Since Joseph Stalin was the long-time ruler of the Soviet Union, historians have judged his reign, however, due to various reasons they haven't been able to agree. Some would say that Stalin moulded the features that characterized the Soviet regain of economic status and shaped the direction of post-World War II Europe. Stalin was also considered by many to be the most powerful person to live during the 20th century. However, many historians would say that Stalin was an evil communist dictator, whose only methods of leadership were force and persecution. Some have likened him to Adolf Hiller, or even said that his reign spelt more pain and suffering for more people than Hitler's. The main reason for the disagreement is the amount of secrecy surrounding Stalin's reign and correct figures of the amount of people killed, for example. ...read more.


Each of these sources have reliable points, as well as unreliable ones. The way the sources are grouped depends only on the place and time they were produced, however, the decision of whether these are reliable or not depends on other circumstances. A source produced during Stalin's reign in Russia, like sources A, D, C, and E, would have to be approved by the government before being produced this would, therefore, make them very unreliable as they only showed good situations and often idolised Stalin. Source A and C, for example, were also 'official' government productions, these were normally part of the Stalin's cult of personality, which was basically a method of using propaganda within the country, to enhance the view of Stalin among the people. ...read more.


The only foreign source that supports Stalin is source F, however, this is unreliable because of the fact that it is written by an American communist who would probably have much the same views as Stalin himself. The final section the sources fit into is sources that were produced after Stalin's lifetime, these are therefore unaffected by rules surrounding productions against Stalin, this is something that might make them more trustworthy. The main problem with these type of sources is that although they have the advantage of an over view, they are secondary sources which are traditionally less reliable. Overall, I think the reason that there is disagreement about Stalin is because of the way all sources in history about him have some type of biased either in his favour, like source E, or against him, like source I. Without a number of completely reliable sources people can only really show an opinion about Stalin, never proper factual evidence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    The only thing, which Stalin achieved, was that all the peasants were under party control. When Germany invaded in 1941 many people welcomed them, if it wasn't for the harshness of the Nazis they would have joined them to fight against Stalin.

  2. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    The centralisation of the control also meant that the economy could quickly move onto a full war footing. Yet despite the strengthening of the Soviet military machine Stalin was partially responsible for the initial military disasters and enormous human casualities during World War II where twenty million of the Soviet population died.

  1. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    This is because if any one tried to do anything to get rid of Stalin such as cause trouble and start riots then he would just have them put down using the secret police.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This proves that they had no choice but to admit to guilt otherwise they would just be tortured more before death. They had to face up to the fact that they were not going to be let go under any circumstances and had to accept the fact they would be killed no matter what.

  1. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    From this, you can gather what live was like for many people of the USSR. They had to do as they were told and did not get a say in anything at all. This is represented by the prison as it shows Stalins mind.

  2. Consider this judgement on the consequences of Stalin's leadership of the Soviet Union 1928 ...

    From then until 1933, peasants were actively encouraged to seize Kulak land. 7 million of them were killed for refusing to comply with the collectivisation that would destroy their livelihood. The turbulence of rapid change in agricultural method unsettled the peasantry; prompting them to destroy over 1/2 the livestock population and burn harvested and planted grain.

  1. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    Whereas source F has more reliable information because it is true that Stalin wasn�t able to convince everyone, it is also true that if someone spoke better than he did,��that man is for it, �� Stalin believes he is the first and the best and that he has the total control over everyone.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Krushchev was very aware of Stalin's paranoia and how if Stalin was to be victorious and successful he needed every Russian to heap praise upon him. Overall, when we analyse Source G we realise that Krushchev is giving a frank and honest view in his analysis and interpretation of Stalin

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work