• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why the government decided to evacuate children during WW2

Extracts from this document...


Why did the GB government decide to evacuate children from Britain's major cities at the start of WW2? More than any previous wars, World War II was a war of machines: tanks, battleships, submarines, but especially planes. Since World War I the plane had developed; it was no longer flimsy and only capable of flying for up to 10 minutes at a time. Planes in World War II could carry more fuel, which meant they could fly further, and they could even carry bombs. The bomber had become a weapon of war and Germany was one of the first countries to recognise its potential. Even in 1932, Stanley Baldwin had said in a House of Commons debate "The bomber will always get through" and this belief that a bombing campaign would be truly terrible informed British strategy in 1939. ...read more.


The hope was that it would be safer for the children to live in the countryside because bombing was less effective in areas where the population was scattered. Thus, if children lived in the countryside, it would be far harder for Hitler to kill them. Children were seen as particularly important because they were Britain's future generations and if the war lasted many years they would be needed to join the armed services. Also, evacuating children kept up the morale of both the men fighting in the war and the people in the cities. If people knew that their children were safe and they didn't have to worry about them, they could do more for the war effort. Moreover, it was thought that it would be devastating to see children injured and it might induce panic in the cities if large scale child casualties occurred. ...read more.


However, children were not the only people to be evacuated from areas at risk of bombing. The 1,147,000 included 524,000 mothers with children under the age of five, and 103,000 teachers. From this is can be seen that evacuation was a huge task, and planning for it had begun in the late 1920's. Some children, though, remained in the cities because either they or their parents did not like the idea of evacuation, which was not compulsory. Some other children returned home during "The Phoney War" and very many parents were not sure precisely where their children had been sent. I think evacuation was a success because although the danger turned out not to be so severe in 1939 it prepared the civilian population for evacuation when the Blitz began in 1940. Also, the 1939 evacuation calmed soldiers and civilians at a time when widespread panic would have greatly harmed the war effort. Perceived fears can be as potent as the real thing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Explain the differencing reactions /feelings of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating ...

    In an interview in 1988 with someone who was an evacuee in 1939 said that ' how I wish the common view on evacuees could be changed, we were not all raised on a diet of fish and chips eaten from newspaper' this shows that not all evacuees were poor

  2. Why did Children Work in the Mills

    The fast production of cotton produced by the power loom left thousand of hand loomed workers unemployed. Over all there is a lot of evidence that show us that life was improving for workers and especially children. In conclusion I will like to sum up what life really was like for children working in the mills.

  1. In WW2, evacuation was very important for the safety of children, how effective was ...

    They look for cleanliness because it is easier to look after a clean child who is well and fit. Some hosts had bad experiences with their evacuees, in source E, a host said, "The children went around the house urinating on the walls."

  2. Evacuation in WW2

    One of the major arguments against Evacuation was the relationship between the host family and the evacuees. As Source E states, 'Although we told the children and their mother off about their filthy habits, they took no notice'. This proves that there was always tension between the two groups of people.

  1. Was Britain well prepared for WW2?

    There was also a large line on the East of England to make sure the Germans couldn't attack the industrial parts. Source C defends this as it shows that Merchant Taylor's "grew before long" showing that the armies were merging into a "Home Guard Platoon" indicating that they were expanding.

  2. World War 2

    They used torpedoes to sink down the British ships. However by March 1944, Admiral Donitz called off the U-Boat campaign because of the heavy losses of U-Boats, while many of the Allies ships were not sunk. The inventions of new types of aircraft that provided cover helped the British identify the German U-Boats.

  1. F Bommber Command decisive in bringing about victrory for Britan WW2

    This was so successful that on its first night in operation almost all of Hamburg was destroyed for the loss of only twelve bombers. The development of planes also helped RAF Bomber Command achieve successes for example the introduction of the Avro Lancaster in 1942 helped bomb dams in the Ruhr thus disrupting main transport routes.

  2. Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain(TM)s major cities in ...

    Therefore, the British civilians needed to be protected and evacuation was one of the main options. By World War One the Germans had developed Zeppelin airships which could reach a maximum speed of 136kph and reach a height of 4250 metres.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work